>>9884662

This.

>>9884610

Jim endorsed a letter, not a specific twitter account. How do anons not see the difference?

>>9884713

>>9884728

Jim may or may not decide to endorse some people, specifically either now or later on. What Jim will likely do, a majority of times, is endorse "messages" no matter the source.

Just like Q does.

>>9884748

>Where social distancing requirement cannot be met, masks must be worn.

Called it. Get ready, parentanons. Oh, and make no mistake about it, patriots are in control. The entire point of letting this psyop run is to get you all to fight.

>>9884930

Perhaps you could take a break from gaping to understand. The message in that letter is valid.

Even the sun shines on a dog's ass, some days, AFLB.

>>9884951

There's way more going on behind the scenes, caker. You've seen this, no?

>>9885012

Speaking in circles, got it.