I think it's pretty clear that you guys are in the deepest shit as far as the international socialist cult is concerned. It will be a long time before most people wake up there–glad you did, at least.
Anons, I posted this about judge Alison Nichols, the Obama appointee assigned to the Ghislaine Maxwell case:
>>9886208 (pb)
I've been doing more research. In particular, I found this blog that is worth bookmarking:
https://rijock.blogspot.com/2020/07/sdny-responds-to-courts-inquiries-in.html
Courts do not easily drop criminal charges in a major case, especially after a jury has decided guilt or inncence, unless the Brady violations are significant, and would have been material to either guilt, or punishment. The evidence at trial does appear to be significant; did the failure to deliver the evidence not timely provided exonerate Ali Sadr ? We cannot say, as it has not been made public.
There's another issue; obviously Ali Sadr has become a cooperating individual; has his cooperation risen to the level where the Government desires to reward him with a dismissal of all criminal charges ? Though rare, such actions do occur, though they are generally not the subject of media attention, as law enforcement does not openly acknowledge it, lest the public ask hard questions about accountability. Look at Reza Zarrab, one of the primary Iran sanctions evaders, who appears to be a cooperator, was quietly released, and has been seen in New York City enjoying dinner at a local restaurant, with a date.
So the question becomes, did the Government choose to let Discovery violations, which obviously did occur, serve as a convenient reason to give Ali Sadr his Get-out-of-Jail-Free card, and is that why the judge asked the SDNY those tough questions ? is that a mjaor favor being granted to Ali Sadr ? Until we have a better understanding of the evidence not provided to defense counsel, we will not be able to answer that question, but we shall be looking into it.
The point is that it isn't exactly clear where this all came from, but it doesn't seem like corruption on the part of the judge. For Berman to suddenly drop the case makes it seem like a deal had been made by the US Government…but then again, why would he get fired two weeks later?
There are just too many unknowns, but I wanted to share all this b/c there's a lot of concernfagging about Ghislaine Maxwell, and I wanted to take a little bit of that away. Not saying the judge is going to be fair–just saying that it doesn't look as bad as it did initially.
>https://bridge-registry.org/homepage/data/
If I remember correctly, bridge is kind of like charitynavigator for international orgs. Supposedly.
In my experience, it provides very little data in comparison. But it's kind of a phony way of lending credibility to something.
Right–in this case, I actually want deals to go through. I thought I'd read somewhere that she can't "partially" cooperate; this article seems to imply it without providing backing:
https://medium.com/@dylanhoward/ghislaines-last-stand-if-epstein-s-accomplice-tells-all-will-the-fallout-be-too-much-even-for-u-s-8fc87089da
If you tell on one, you must tell on all. The SDNY will not let her cherry-pick who it is she throws under the bus or protects. A lot of very big names should be very nervous right now.
If that's the case, I would be perfectly happy with her walking…so long as all the higher ups get taken down.
It will work out, anon.
When things are going crazy for me, when I'm at my wit's end, I just open up a random page of the Bible. Usually, there's something directly applicable that helps me to see the light.
Sometimes I go to a Bible randomizer, like this one:
http://bibledice.com/
…admittedly, I don't always find the right message on the first try. But it almost always comes, whether I like it or not.
It sounds dumb, but it helps me.
May God Bless you and help you in your struggles.