Anonymous ID: 2abd60 July 8, 2020, 5:52 a.m. No.9893427   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3438

http://www.uspoliticsandnews.com/how-did-everyone-miss-this-obvious-hillary-epstein-connection/

 

Alex Djerassi landed his big job at the State Department in 2012, and stayed on the job until 2015, right before Hillary left the State Department.

 

The younger Djerassi was just 25 years old when he landed this position. Oh, well, what’s the big deal, right? It’s not like Hillary gave an important job to a kid who was fresh out of college. Oh, wait.

 

According to his bio, young Alex Djerassi was put in charge of the State Department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, covering the Middle East. He worked directly on the Arab Spring, and Hillary sent Alex as the US representative to the expatriate rebel groups Friends of Libya and Friends of the Syrian People.

 

In other words, Hillary put the inexperienced son of one of her donors in charge of handling two of the biggest foreign policy debacles of the Obama administration: Libya and Syria.

 

What’s this have to do with the Clintons’ connections to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell? Everything.

 

Alex Djerassi’s mother is Isabel Maxwell. As in, Ghislaine Maxwell’s sister.

 

Hillary Clinton put Ghislaine Maxwell’s fresh-out-of-college, 25-year-old nephew in charge of the Obama administration’s Libya and Syria policy.

Anonymous ID: 2abd60 July 8, 2020, 6:24 a.m. No.9893595   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3602

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/07/why-are-right-wing-conspiracies-so-obsessed-with-pedophilia/

 

Why Are Right-Wing Conspiracies so Obsessed With Pedophilia?

 

>>9893561

Anonymous ID: 2abd60 July 8, 2020, 7:40 a.m. No.9894080   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4094

https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/british-court-rules-against-christopher-steele-orders

 

https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2020-07/Aven%20v%20Orbis.Judgment%20Summary.pdf

 

British court rules against Christopher Steele, orders damages paid to businessmen named in dossier

 

A British judge ruled Wednesday that Christopher Steele violated a data privacy law by failing to check the accuracy of information in his infamous dossier, ordering the former spy’s firm to pay damages to two businessmen he wrongly accused of making illicit payments in Russia.

 

Justice Mark Warby of the High Court of England and Wales ordered Steele’s firm, Orbis Business Intelligence, to pay a modest 18,000 English pounds – about $22,596 in American currency – each to Petr Aven and Mikhail Fridman as compensation for a violation of Britain’s Data Protection Act 1998 .

 

Warby ruled that while Steele had a national security interest to share his intelligence with U.S. and British authorities, several of the allegations in Memo 112 of the Steele dossier were “inaccurate or misleading as a matter of fact.”

 

The judge ruled Steele violated the law by failing to aggressively check the accuracy of one claim accusing Aven and Fridman of making illicit payments to Russia President Vladimir Putin before distributing it to various U.S. and British figures, including the FBI.

 

“That is an allegation of serial criminal wrongdoing, over a prolonged period. Even in the limited and specific context of reporting intelligence for the purposes I have mentioned, and despite all the other factors I have listed, the steps taken to verify that proposition fell short of what would have been reasonable,” Warby ruled.

 

“The allegation clearly called for closer attention, a more enquiring approach, and more energetic checking,” the judge added.

 

The ruling involves a long-discredited claim in Steele’s dossier – repeatedly used by U.S. news media – that Russia’s Alfa Bank, connected to Aven and Fridman, was transmitting secret messages between Moscow and the Trump campaign during the 2016 election.

 

The FBI concluded the computer pings were not nefarious messages but rather routine behavior most likely connected to email spam. Special Counsel Robert Mueller told Congress last year he did not believe the allegations.

 

Fridman hailed the ruling in a statement.

 

“We are delighted with the outcome of this case and that Mr Justice Warby has determined what we have always known to be the case – that the contents of Memorandum 112 are inaccurate and misleading," he said. "Ever since these odious allegations were first made public in January 2017, my partners and I have been resolute and unwavering in our determination to prove that they are untrue, and through this case, we have finally succeeded in doing so.”

 

This is a developing story that will be updated.