>>9893490

Whoa… it just occurred to me looking at these.

Yes, they appear in public with these bruises, but if we assume that it's an open secret that this is cult behavior (to the point where the cult can remind a politician that they're owned, right in plain sight)… what if these photographs were held by people like Epstein? What if the blackmail isn't JUST pics of politicians involved in sex with children but also more basic level stuff, "here's the mark, this guy belongs to us." Who says the photographers have to give EVERY photo they take to the media, and not hand over a couple "private" photos to the cult handlers?

>>9893509

To add, it's not like we ever see the politicians in the limelight when they have the bruise. What if they aren't "allowed" to go on TV when the bruise is visible?

>>9893614

Point stands for the ones that aren't fake. This is the first confirmed eye bruise fake I've seen here since Q was on halfchan.