>9900438
Did you really forget that Huffman is a cannibal?
>9900438
Did you really forget that Huffman is a cannibal?
Incorrect. All speech with exception of that causing actual imminent danger cannot be infringed.
This is also not entirely correct.
In the case of privately owned places where a company acts in a quasi-governmental fashion, they also are not allowed to infringe.
False. It is defined as clearly inciting violence and or physical harm.
What part of "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech" do you not understand, you slobbering degenerate cretin?
>A law found to discriminate based on viewpoint is an “egregious form of content discrimination,” which is “presumptively unconstitutional.”
You you illiterate or just stupid?
This literally means that making laws against hate speech are unconstitutional.
leftist faggot is so slow at responding…..
Tis a nonstandard verb.
ok i'm stealin these.
I don't think newshill is smart enough to follow a conversation correctly….