Anonymous ID: 277c60 July 8, 2020, 7:38 p.m. No.9900629   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0671

>>9900611

This is also not entirely correct.

 

In the case of privately owned places where a company acts in a quasi-governmental fashion, they also are not allowed to infringe.

Anonymous ID: 277c60 July 8, 2020, 7:46 p.m. No.9900693   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0725 >>1048

>>9900618

False. It is defined as clearly inciting violence and or physical harm.

What part of "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech" do you not understand, you slobbering degenerate cretin?

Anonymous ID: 277c60 July 8, 2020, 7:54 p.m. No.9900779   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1048

>>9900725

 

>A law found to discriminate based on viewpoint is an “egregious form of content discrimination,” which is “presumptively unconstitutional.”

 

You you illiterate or just stupid?

 

This literally means that making laws against hate speech are unconstitutional.