So did Tammy stop here shilling after she doxed herself last night?

It was one of the chan-memoments like when Q was called a newfag, etc.

someone was horible with some really awful shilling all evening.

It was someone going on about telling everyone that they were a . . . . . and that whole trigger word thing.

then at the beginning of the next bread the boasting about boring shill (a u s t i m not but n) and boasting and posted a 'link' but it was a directory name in a well known file structure that showed a username (I only give you the name Tammy, you'll have to go back to find the rest of it).

after that Tammy didn't seem to post anymore.

Or did I fall asleep?

There was that rather strange creeper-tells-ya post, too, the bread before the person (alledged) to self dox. the shill in the previous bread (who may have been the same one) said (there seemed to be two threds of shills that bread)

the one who was the boring-shill going on about the tall Gobberly kid (who needs our prayers) said "I discovered Aus< <n"

well, sounds like somoene is a bit obcessive.

so if you have some woman who seems to perhaps be a spychologist, and she's going on and on about a kid who is a tall confused young man who needs to be purged of the substance that they (who they? the spycologist? are you accuseing the spychologist of wanting to harm the big Goof?).

my point: the big Goof is, in the scenario of the narrative implied by the self-dox, the big Goof is someone needing council who may snap out of it, whose obviously being harrassed by a big-blob of a self-doxing creepy poster.

the other posible answer I suppose (if it's really an answer, just another possible narrative, what normal sane healthy and inteligent pepole call 'conjecture', but bad-narratiors of the cabal call 'conspiracy theory') the other answer is that the 'dox' was done intentionally to give out a name, and that the person whose name it is did not do it either . That to me seems the most likely as these troll efforts of the ones who write articles saying, for exmaple, false-consensus narrative about anon in any forum, (all you people are BLAH_BLAH_BLAH-ists and worse than WORSECASE_TRIGGER_PEOPLE).

the pathetic shills stop at nothing and go on with it, like a water leak in a library, it ruins all the books there, regardless of the content.

however let's not let that anaolgy hold any meaning here. The fact is that no one who would be here long term lurking and posting, a real person, none of the 'real pepole' here would be the type who would be racists, or sexists, or haters.

why is that?

when it seems to be that here so often?

Because we came here because of the promise of Justice!

That this was a place where often the real heroes would look for answers.

We came here not for hate or for conspiracy, but for love and full disclosure of what needs to be known by all of the ordinary people.

The smeer that we are bad here, as anon, just for being here, is the one that anon will face within the next few days.

the shills will troll a specific banter abuot use being R-words (rac_i st s)

so expect that.

and if the person does it you might ask her (her?)

are you, are you , are you . . . in love?

and then maybe post a link to Debbie.

and if you don't know who Debbie is, then don't post it.

(Debbie is Carrie's mom, they were cofunctional in Hollywood for a very long time, and very well known)

>>9903569

let them think that they know, they and their clueless minions.

I've been learning how the information aobut key historical locusts of power is suppressed so that the creepologists of the creepying left have no idea where the real targets are.

they spy-coms (don't you mean Chicoms?) might think that they have a base of data, but in fact they are stuck in a change-root jail, in a sub-web, in a sub space, in a sub catogory, because they are all subs, and they seem to feel cosy there.

how will we free these people?

what life can you give a slave like that after you destory their electric temples of means and have to care-for and feed them for a while, so that they can continue, as they were major victims of a victim minded culture of abusive politcal hedge-mongering.

where will the spy-comms go when their electric temples go dark for the rest of eternity? Who will lead them to the promise of a better future that comes to all with the sudden emergence of the new age.

"it's time" some will say, but we haven't heard the real word yet.

when those electric temples go dark for the last time, and the slaves-minded chi-subs finally realize that their masters are the fowl urge, and they were tasked to hound the righteous. And because they are righteous, the do give a route for slaves to be free after the collapse of the hedge-mongering overlords.

Chicomms will be free, children of a flood? let us hope there is no giant flood of river water there.

>>9903662

get a life.

some of us are actually able to churn out content. We don't back space with every misspelling. And if we did then when we posted, the bread would be over and we'd have wasted our time.

spell check memes, yes.

a shitpost is a shit post. you are just a badger.

>>9903696

if the notable is notable the baker reviews and adds.

a 'why is it' makes it difficult.

if you can't see right away why it is, then it's not notable.

in other words it is up to the original poster to make the information useful enough that it gives a message right away. If that isn't there, then the 'nominator' ought not explain someone else's post, and perhaps get it wrong.

>>9903710

conflation

her class of creature is outside the realm of American Justice and mock us all with their constant mocking. They have no love except for their own urges of being 'famous' in the pantheon of their family.

they would errase all other's history, and force us into a world where wheezing dot-org mongering troll-shill 'manager class' imports from a clone farm rule the world.

>>9903765

oh, the ironic creep mock, of a meme.

but that kind of 'ironic voice of evil' meme or post is always taken in it's worst case unironically within the articles of narrative-mongering cabal trolls, who will be smeering us again and at any moment.

Plus, I'm rather sick of seeing that stars wars crap. (just a personal opinion). and the shills will say 'no we own it now.' as if it's public domain. When they know it is not.

>>9903788

this is an example of the spy-journalism of the left putting in crap here to smeer this board.

spycological jounalism psychological operations are all FAIL at the go.

you shouldn't even bother.

this channel is righteous. You have no voice if it's not a voice for The Truth!

Meaning: ha ha, all your shilling is coming to naught.

>>9903795

if you want to defeat the narratives of the left, you don't join in them and use all their assumptions.

'people of the . . . ' idiom is pure marxist-speech mind mush.

>>9903802

instead they should side-by side him with a Michael Jackson statue.

>>9903810

Do good for your enemies

pray for your enemies

the mindslaves who are traped in the mindset of socialism will have to have a path to their future. many of them will not understand at first that they had been shilling for the bad people.

for example one wonders how someone like that person from Somalia gets to go and squat in a chair in the District Swampicus, and then say seditious things about the very government that so graciously brought her people here.

(a true cut throat persona, someone without shame, who has not home here if she goes on with it)

I mean let's send her back to where she was from.

there might already be another clone inside the glass enclousure? that is why we don't send her back?

see now if you say silly narratives like that you just give the shill-journalists more ammo?

what that we have playful science fiction minded anon who toy with the idea that all these slimey minons of marxists come from a test tube. It's at least an allegory about how they think about others: in a clone minded marxist narrative.

Send the woman back to Someother-ia

>>9903842

cringe lame repetitive operational words.

copy pasta of lyrics by clown-song music industry.

robo spurge cringe

>>9903865

seriously?

did you even read what I wrote?

"send her back to the glass enclosure, no there is already someone else there"

I'm paraphrasing.

obviously these are people who were bred for their 'stations'.

what do I need to expand?

you need to expand your reading comprehension.

>>9903875

wow. Sad for you.

so you don't know any free people?

>>9903756

"It's . . . . no matter who uses them."

who uses the one who uses the N word?

you din't say 'that word' or 'the Nword'.

Them thus refers to the people who are the 'racial divider' ones , your subject in the first sentence?

so who is it that uses the racial dividers?

that would be the head marxists, and the ones above them.

they use the racial dividers to further their neffariousness.

>>9903904

anyone who doesn't want to make the product can resign and go work some place else.

if I were running a manufacturing company and I had marxists in the midst spewing out talkiing points that are against the clients of the company, I would try and remove those rabble from their positions in manufacturing as I would suspect that they might be part of some 'resistence' that would sabotage the manufacturing efforts.

they would get pink slips the next day in a sane world.

but we live in a cuckold world

and police must worry that the product that they purchase arrives pre-sabotaged.

the shills must not like my narrative about freeing the mind slaves and needing a path for the ones who don't just end up to hell-an-gone.

cool, I'm getting through.

>>9903961

you are talking to yourself.

well, fine, be one of the ones who marches out like a windup toy robot, gets to the center of the action, and then just fizzles out in a pathetic breakdown, crying on a gurney.

you are so obvious.

go away gate keeper troll.

you are here every day chasing away all the real anon and anon don't care what you say, and your spycology efforts have NO EFFECT

>>9903981

this anon pulls nouns from their operational list of 'keep them on this topic'

what it is, anon, is that your methods are known, and all your activity to harm this board is a 'shill fail'.

I'm a stupid stream of consciousness automatic typer who has nothing to do with anything other than watching you be an idiot and constantly stream out your false accusations in the manner of a common street marxist.

it's obvious.

you should know you need to figure out what you will be, what role you will play in the our future.

or you are one of those who can't be saved.

and I just tell you through my creative craft, and you go on with it. hope that pay check is worth it.

I say 'im just' meaning not as a bad thing.

or buying into a lower opinion.

shills fail, and anon shine on.

>>9904048

no

>>9904043

your curse goes back to you.

God is not your puppet

the shill team gets flustered when real people are active in the bread.

be active, anon, and tell them what they are doing and do not let them say what this board is.

they want to 'own' the board.