>>9907485 (pb)

What you seem to be trying to do here, is an attempt to prosecute someone and attach a crime to what someone may believe or think instead of an actual crime. Thought crimes. Wrong think.

People can believe whatever they want, it's when they act upon those beliefs and commit an actual crime on an INDIVIDUAL basis. You seem to want to round up anyone who believes the same thing but may not have actually been involved in a crime. Very slippery slope.

>>9907805

Okay. Well let us know when you have the actual perps in custody. Oh, that was 100 years ago? Let me guess, you're in favor of reparations too aren't you?

>>9907879

Justice. Evidence. Sure, round them up if needed and go through them one by one. You have to be able to PROVE guilt, with evidence. Innocent until proven guilty. What part of that do you not understand?