>>986747

Wasn't 1/22 mentioned at some point? Which would imply that Q is in that photo, and that the group is Q group?

Unless the quote was 1:22

I think we have a distinction to look at in that case for interpreting comms, i cant recall but i hope you guys have an idea of the difference between / and :

>>991464

POTUS can't fire him without first neutralizing RR/MSM - optics would be horrific, likely would see major protests in northern cities