Including "sacred hearts" and familiar spirits parading as "queen" does not bless, but curse. And Mary was not immaculately conceived. She was a sinner as anyone else was. Prayers do not rise through a familiar spirit.
What utter blasphemy from this vigano character.
Including "sacred hearts" and familiar spirits parading as "queen" does not bless, but curse. And Mary was not immaculately conceived. She was a sinner as anyone else was. Prayers do not rise through a familiar spirit.
What utter blasphemy from this vigano character.
That supposed "tunnel" didn't appear to be a tunnel when some u-tuber got on the island and looked in it. Seemed like some sort of storage.
You are asking to prove a negative.
The sauce is whatever the Apostles left in writing, and that was not included. This is why John left anyone adding to their doctrine, a curse:
9 Whoever transgresses and does not abide in the doctrine of Christ does not have God. He who abides in the doctrine of Christ has both the Father and the Son.
10 If anyone comes to you and does not bring this doctrine, do not receive him into your house nor greet him;
11 for he who greets him shares in his evil deeds. 1 John
John called it a "transgression" to not "abide" by their doctrine, which they wrote, like this particular letter.
All such transgressing that doctrine, DO NOT HAVE GOD.
Only those abiding by that Doctrine, have the Father and the Son.
Those in the Father and the Son are not to receive anyone bringing anything different from what their Doctrine.
Even greeting them, which involved a blessing, is sharing in their transgression.
Any group saying these Doctrines, recorded faithfully, are not the only source of inspiration, make such claims because the Apostles never taught what they are claiming.
You are asking to prove a negative.
The sauce is whatever the Apostles left in writing, and that was not included. This is why John left anyone adding to their doctrine, a curse:
9 Whoever transgresses and does not abide in the doctrine of Christ does not have God. He who abides in the doctrine of Christ has both the Father and the Son.
10 If anyone comes to you and does not bring this doctrine, do not receive him into your house nor greet him;
11 for he who greets him shares in his evil deeds. 1 John
John called it a "transgression" to not "abide" by their doctrine, which they wrote, like this particular letter.
All such transgressing that doctrine, DO NOT HAVE GOD.
Only those abiding by that Doctrine, have the Father and the Son.
Those in the Father and the Son are not to receive anyone bringing anything different from what their Doctrine.
Even greeting them, which involved a blessing, is sharing in their transgression.
Any group saying these Doctrines, recorded faithfully, are not the only source of inspiration, make such claims because the Apostles never taught what they are claiming.
Oh, and then there's this:
All have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. Rom. 3:23
No, not "except" His human mother. I have thought it through, by examining the Scriptures. Under the Jewish laws, women could not pass on an inheritance, even though they could receive one.
The sin nature was inherited through Adam, and passed down through ALL earthly fathers. THAT was why Christ did not have a fleshly earthly father, so He would not be under that legality.
The Romish doctrine of the immaculate conception DOES NOT REFER to how Christ was conceived in her, but to how SHE was conceived in HER mother's womb.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immaculate_Conception