So show me your sauce that Mary was NOT Immaculately conceived.
In a prophecy about the appearance of the Messiah, Isaiah foretold: “Look! The young woman will become pregnant and will give birth to a son.” (Isaiah 7:14) Under divine inspiration, the Gospel writer Matthew applied Isaiah’s prophecy to Mary’s conception of Jesus. After reporting that Mary miraculously became pregnant, Matthew added: “All of this actually came about to fulfill what was spoken by Jehovah through his prophet, saying: ‘Look! The virgin * will become pregnant and will give birth to a son, and they will name him Immanuel,’ which means, when translated, ‘With Us Is God.’”—Matthew 1:22, 23.
The Gospel writer Luke also reported Mary’s miraculous pregnancy. He wrote that God sent the angel Gabriel “to a virgin promised in marriage to a man named Joseph of David’s house, and the name of the virgin was Mary.” (Luke 1:26, 27) Mary confirmed that she was a virgin. After hearing that she was to become the mother of Jesus, the Messiah, Mary asked: “How is this to be, since I am not having sexual relations with a man?”—Luke 1:34.
How could a virgin birth happen?
Mary’s pregnancy came about by means of holy spirit, which is God’s power in action. (Matthew 1:18) Mary was told: “Holy spirit will come upon you, and power of the Most High will overshadow you. And for that reason the one who is born will be called holy, God’s Son.” * (Luke 1:35) God miraculously transferred his Son’s life to the womb of Mary, causing her to conceive a child.
My original point was your separate sentence.
And Mary was not immaculately conceived. She was a sinner as anyone else was. Prayers do not rise through a familiar spirit.
Right there YOU state she was NOT immaculately conceived. My post proves she WAS. You missed the point.
The PROPHETS and GOSPEL AUTHORS are referred to in my post to defend my defense of the Cardinals prayer. You are just hung up on ROME. I get it. You’re a Protestant. Your ego should be checked at the painted red doors.