>>9909933 lb

And then we went to war right after that. That was a racket but Butler was a stooge. No hero. Part of a psyop.

https://cuttingthroughthefog.com/2017/08/19/major-general-smedley-butler-was-a-fraud-and-a-liar/

The plausibility of the Business Plot rests on the assumption that Roosevelt’s policies went against the interests of bankers, industrialists and Wall Street financiers—or at least a very powerful subset of them (including the Morgans and DuPonts who were implicated in the plot). Implied is that his policies were so beyond the pale that he was nearly deposed or turned into a puppet of a fascist government controlled by the likes of J.P. Morgan, Jr. On top of that, we also need to believe that Smedley Butler was the kind of guy who would stand up to the powerful bankers and rat them out due to his “patriotism, integrity, and dedication to democracy.” But at the same time, we need to believe he’s the kind of guy the bankers would approach to lead the coup, even though by then he was already going around giving speeches condemning war profiteers, among them Morgan and DuPont, and exclaiming that “War is a Racket!”

You can see the story is already starting to fall apart under its own internal contradictions before I’ve even started to show that none of these assumptions are true: Roosevelt’s policies were practically dictated by wealthy bankers, Wall Street financiers, and big business; and Smedley Butler was a big fat phony.

The “business plot” was manufactured to make it appear to the public as if Roosevelt’s policies were really for the common good and not a big giveaway to bankers and industrialists. If they hated it enough to depose FDR, then it had to be good, right? By making people believe that a fascist coup was narrowly avoided, it gave the false impression that the country was not already a plutocracy fully controlled by Wall Street.

Now, I realize that all we’ve ever heard about Butler is what an honorable man he was and how much he cared for grunts and regular folk. In the book, The Plot to Seize the White House (you see how that implies the White House was not already seized), Jules Archer describes Butler as “a man of incorruptible character, integrity, and patriotism.” So where do I get off calling him a fraud and a liar?

To answer that, we need to start by questioning the basic logic and sense of this whole story: After retiring from the military, Butler started going around the country giving speeches denouncing the war profiteers and admitting that his career in the Marines was spent as a racketeer for capitalism. But if he was a man of such integrity and incorruptible character, then why was he willing to do the dirty work for them for all those years?

In one of those speeches, transcribed here, he brags that he was a racketeer for capitalism for 33 years:

And yet, during all that time, he never had any qualms about it or considered resigning? Given his alleged moral character, this is the least we would expect of him once he realized the orders he was following were wrong. Did he suddenly have a change of heart? A transformative epiphany that what he was doing was wrong? No, not according to him. So what made him suddenly start denouncing his former deeds? Here is his explanation, from a speech given in 1933.

So apparently he would have been against it all along but didn’t realize what was really going on. And we’re just supposed to believe that? He had no idea what he was doing? As a Major General he suspended his mental faculties and just obeyed orders? Imagine he had instead said, “Every day for 33 years I gagged on Morgan’s member and took Rock’s feller from behind. I suspected I was just their whore at that time, but my mental faculties remained in suspended animation. Now I am sure of it.” Would you buy it? I wouldn’t.

It doesn't matter. They still got what they wanted which is to stay there forever.

Powell is just injecting the bullshit counter narrative to make it seem he's not on board which he obviously is.

>>9910018

>>9910013

Why are you surprised? America is all about fags, trannies and black people now.

>>9909990

President Franklin D. Roosevelt's Jewish Cabal

Some of these Jews were directly responsible for plunging America into WWII by deliberately alienating America from anti-Communist countries such as Germany and Japan long before the outbreak of hostilities. These Jews also pioneered the idea of Big Egalitarian Government in America; some of them were later discovered to have been spies for the Soviet Union.

Franklin Delano Roosevelt (photo at right), president of the United States of America, 1933-1945, was himself partly of Dutch-Jewish ancestry.

1. Bernard M. Baruch – a financier and adviser to FDR.

1. Felix Frankfurter – Supreme Court Justice; a key player in FDR's New Deal system.

1. David E. Lilienthal – director of Tennessee Valley Authority, adviser. The TVA changed the relationship of government-to-business in America.

1. David Niles – presidential aide.

1. Louis Brandeis – U.S. Supreme Court Justice; confidante of FDR; "Father" of New Deal.

1. Samuel I. Rosenman – official speechwriter for FDR.

1. Henry Morgenthau Jr. – Secretary of the Treasury, "unofficial" presidential adviser. Father of the Morgenthau Plan to re-structure Germany/Europe after WWII.

1. Benjamin V. Cohen – State Department official, adviser to FDR.

1. Rabbi Stephen Wise – close pal of FDR, spokesman for the American Zionist movement, head of The American Jewish Congress.

1. Frances Perkins – Secretary of Labor; allegedly Jewish/adopted at birth; unconfirmed.

1. Sidney Hillman – presidential adviser.

1. Anna Rosenberg – longtime labor adviser to FDR, and manpower adviser with the Manpower Consulting Committee of the Army and Navy Munitions Board and the War Manpower Commission.

1. Herbert H. Lehman – Governor of New York, 1933-1942, Director of U.S. Office of Foreign Relief and Rehabilitation Operations, Department of State, 1942-1943; Director-General of UNRRA, 1944 - 1946, pal of FDR.

1. Herbert Feis – U.S. State Department official, economist, and an adviser on international economic affairs.

1. R. S. Hecht – financial adviser to FDR.

1. Nathan Margold – Department of the Interior Solicitor, legal adviser.

1. Jesse I. Straus – adviser to FDR.

1. H. J. Laski – "unofficial foreign adviser" to FDR.

1. E. W. Goldenweiser – Federal Reserve Director.

1. Charles E. Wyzanski – U.S. Labor department legal adviser.

1. Samuel Untermyer – lawyer, "unofficial public ownership adviser" to FDR.

1. Jacob Viner – Tax expert at the U.S. Treasury Department, assistant to the Treasury Secretary.

1. Edward Filene – businessman, philanthropist, unofficial presidential adviser.

1. David Dubinsky – Labor leader, president of International Ladies Garment Workers Union.

1. William C. Bullitt – part-Jewish, ambassador to USSR [is claimed to be Jonathan Horwitz's grandson; unconfirmed].

1. Mordecai Ezekiel – Agriculture Department economist.

1. Abe Fortas – Assistant director of Securities and Exchange Commission, Department of the Interior Undersecretary.

1. Isador Lubin – Commissioner of Labor Statistics, unofficial labor economist to FDR.

1. Harry Dexter White [Weiss] – Assistant Secretary of the Treasury; a key founder of the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank; adviser, close pal of Henry Morgenthau. Co-wrote the Morgenthau Plan.

1. Alexander Holtzoff – Special assistant, U.S. Attorney General's Office until 1945; [presumed to be Jewish; unconfirmed].

1. David Weintraub – official in the Office of Foreign Relief and Rehabilitation Operations; helped create the United Nations; Secretary, Committee on Supplies, 1944-1946.

1. Nathan Gregory Silvermaster – Agriculture Department official and head of the Near East Division of the Board of Economic Warfare; helped create the United Nations.

1. Harold Glasser – Treasury Department director of the division of monetary research. Treasury spokesman on the affairs of United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration.

1. Irving Kaplan – U.S. Treasury Department official, pal of David Weintraub.

1. Solomon Adler – Treasury Department representative in China during World War II.

1. Benjamin Cardozo – U.S. Supreme Court Justice.

1. Leo Wolman – chairman of the National Recovery Administration's Labor advisery Board; labor economist.

1. Rose Schneiderman – labor organizer; on the advisery board of the National Recovery Administration.

1. Jerome Frank – general counsel to the Agricultural Adjustment Administration, Justice, U.S. Court of Appeals, 1941-57.

>>9909990

>>9910065

1. Gerard Swope – key player in the creation of the N.R.A. [National Recovery Administration]

1. Herbert Bayard Swope – brother of Gerard

1. Lucien Koch – consumer division, N.R.A. [apparently-Jewish]

1. J. David Stern – Federal Reserve Board, appointed by FDR

1. Nathan Straus – housing adviser

1. Charles Michaelson – Democratic [DNC] publicity man

1. Lawrence Steinhardt – ambassador to Soviet Union

1. Harry Guggenheim – heir to Guggenheim fortune, adviser on aviation

1. Arthur Garfield Hays – adviser on civil liberties

1. David Lasser – head of Worker's Alliance, labor activist

1. Max Zaritsky – labor adviser

1. James Warburg – millionaire, early backer of New Deal before backing out

1. Louis Kirstein – associate of E. Filene

1. Charles Wyzanski, Jr. – counsel, Dept. of Labor

1. Charles Taussig – early New Deal adviser

1. Jacob Baker – assistant to W.P.A. head Harry Hopkins; assistant head of W.P.A. [Works Progress Admin.]

1. Louis H. Bean – Dept. of Agriculture official

1. Abraham Fox – research director, Tariff Commission

1. Benedict Wolf – National Labor Relations Board [NLRB]

1. William Leiserson – NLRB

1. David J. Saposs – NLRB

1. A. H. Meyers – NLRB [New England division]

1. L. H. Seltzer – head economist at the Treasury Dept.

1. Edward Berman – Dept. of Labor official

1. Jacob Perlman – Dept. of Labor official

1. Morris L. Jacobson – chief statistician of the Government Research Project

1. Jack Levin – assistant general manager, Rural Electrification Authority

1. Harold Loeb – economic consultant, N.R.P.

1. William Seagle – council, Petroleum Labor Policy Board

1. Herman A. Gray – policy committee, National Housing Conference

1. Alexander Sachs – rep. of Lehman Bros., early New Deal consultant

1. Paul Mazur – rep. of Lehman Bros., early consultant for New Deal

1. Henry Alsberg – head of the Writer's Project under the W.P.A.

1. Lincoln Rothschild – New Deal art administrator

>>9910065

>>9909990

>>9910078

Stalin’s Secret Agents: The Subversion of Roosevelt’s Government by M. Stanton Evans and Herbert Romerstein.

The impression we would get from Untold History is that the Soviet Union, whose non-aggression pact with Nazi Germany allowed the two countries to fire the opening shots of World War II, was a passive victim of the war and of the Cold War aftermath. Having suffered far more than their Western allies in the war, Stalin and the Soviet Union he controlled with an iron fist, wanted nothing more than to rebuild and to defend themselves from renewed threats from the West.

We should remind ourselves, though, that wars are not natural phenomena like hurricanes and earthquakes. They are political events, fought for political objectives. And Joseph Stalin was not just the ruler of the Soviet Union. He was the leader of the extremely virulent and aggressive worldwide Communist movement. By any objective measure, the big winners in World War II were the Soviet Union and the Communist movement. The Soviet Union became larger, swallowing up the Baltic countries and taking part of the territory of Poland. Not just Poland, the preservation of whose independence was the supposed casus belli of WW II for the West, but a number of previously independent Eastern European countries, including half of Germany, fell under the boot of Soviet-controlled Communist tyranny. Furthermore, the stage was set by the war for the Communist takeover of China and the northern part of Korea.

The Soviet war and post-war gains at the West’s expense were hardly an accident. They had ample assistance from a Roosevelt administration that was thoroughly laced with Stalin’s agents. The agents were sufficiently numerous and highly placed that almost any theft of secrets they might have accomplished was small potatoes compared to their influence upon policy. A central message – never explicitly stated – is that there was an international conspiracy to, in effect, overthrow Western civilization. (The authors would never point it out, but readers of the book will notice that a high percentage of the people involved were Jewish. Readers of this review will notice, as well, that some of the key brave people sounding the alarm over this subversion were also Jewish.) Not only was the U.S. government penetrated at the highest level, but this organized Communist network also apparently controlled key positions in the U.S. opinion-molding business.

Nowhere was the subversive influence more important than at the pivotal Yalta Conference. It was there that Roosevelt made the major concessions that put the Red imprint on post-war Europe and opened the door for them in East Asia. One of the reasons we were so conciliatory to Stalin was supposedly that we needed the Soviet quid pro quo of their entry into the war against Japan 90 days after the defeat of Germany. But, according to Evans and Romerstein, Soviet agents of influence within the Roosevelt government played a key role in keeping intelligence estimates away from FDR that the Japanese were already so badly beaten that the Soviet assistance would not be needed. Perhaps no agent was more important than the notorious Alger Hiss. Here we pick up the Evans-Romerstein narrative early in Chapter 3 entitled “See Alger Hiss about this.” Bear in mind that FDR’s new secretary of state, Edward Stettinius Jr., was newly appointed and had very little experience in foreign affairs. He was, in short, in over his head:

At a White House briefing a month before the conference opened, Stettinius wrote, FDR said he wasn’t overly concerned about having any particular staffers with him at Yalta, but qualified this with two exceptions. “The President,” said Stettinius, “did not want to have anyone accompany him in an advisory capacity, but he felt that Messrs. Bowman and Alger Hiss ought to go (Authors’ footnote: Dr. Isaiah Bowman of Johns Hopkins University, who had been involved in the Versailles conference after World War I and was a Stettinius adviser. He did not go to Yalta, though Alger Hiss would do so.) No clue was provided by Stettinius or apparently by FDR himself, as to the reason for these choices.

Alger Hiss, it will be recalled, was a secret Communist serving in the wartime State Department, identified as a Soviet agent by ex-Communist Whittaker Chambers, a former espionage courier for Moscow’s intelligence bosses. This identification led to a bitter quarrel that divided the nation into conflicting factions and would do so for years to follow. The dispute resulted in the 1950 conviction of Hiss for perjury when he denied the Chambers charges under oath, denials that ran contrary to the evidence then and to an ever-increasing mass of data later.

>>9909990

>>9910065

>>9910078

>>9910101

Also named by Chambers as a Soviet agent along with White and Hiss, was White House aide, Lauchlin Currie, the patron of Owen Lattimore, who would play a key role in the loss of China to the Communists. Not named by Chambers was the most powerful of FDR’s aides promoting Soviet interests in the Roosevelt administration, his “assistant president,” Harry Hopkins. Hopkins’ name, however, would turn up later among the Venona intercepts as a likely Soviet agent, as would the name of his powerful protg on the staffs of both Roosevelt and Truman, David Niles.

Among the key sources for the revelations of Evans and Romerstein are the aforementioned early revelations of Chambers as recounted in his 1952 book, Witness, Chambers’ Congressional testimony in 1948, the testimony of another Communist defector, Elizabeth Bentley, in the same year, and the files of the FBI and KGB files made accessible since the fall of the Soviet Union.

>>9910101

>>9910122

>>9910078

>>9910065

>>9909990

How Could Roosevelt Subvert His Own Government?

For all the extremely valuable information in Stalin’s Secret Agents it falls crucially short in the most fundamental information that it fails to impart. We see the vital missed opportunity early in Chapter 6, “The First Red Decade”:

In 1939, shocked by the Hitler-Stalin pact and otherwise disenchanted, Chambers decided to break openly with Moscow and tell the authorities what he knew about the infiltration. In September 1939, accompanied by anti-Communist writer-editor Isaac Don Levine, he had a lengthy talk with Assistant Secretary of State Adolf Berle, then doubling as a specialist on security matters for the White House.

Chambers would later repeat his story to the FBI, at legislative hearings, and to federal courtrooms, as well as in a bestselling memoir, becoming in the process the most famous and in some ways most important witness in American Cold War history. However, it’s evident from the record that much of what he had to say was revealed in this initial talk with Berle. And what he would reveal, both then and later, was an astonishing picture of subversion, reaching into numerous government agencies and rising to significant levels.

Specifically, Chambers would name a sizable group of suspects then holding federal jobs, most notably Alger Hiss, and provide examples of activity by official U.S. staffers working on behalf of Moscow. Judging by Berle’s notes – and a parallel set recorded by Levine – it was a shocking tale that should have set alarm bells ringing and led quickly to corrective action. But so far as anyone was ever able to tell, no bells were rung or action taken. It appears, indeed, that virtually nothing would be done about the Chambers data for years thereafter.

Berle himself would later downplay the Chambers information, saying the people named were merely members of a “study group” and thus not a security danger. But this version was belied by Berle’s own notes about his talk with Chambers. The heading he gave these wasn’t “Marxist study group,” but “Underground Espionage Agents.” As Chambers would comment in his memoir, he was obviously describing “not a Marxist study group, but a Communist conspiracy.” And the people named would fully live up to that description. (pp. 78-79)

Talk about an astonishing picture! Consider, please, the kicker in the foregoing passage and its passive voice: “But so far as anyone was ever able to tell, no bells were rung or action taken.”

>>9910101

>>9910101

>>9910122

>>9910078

>>9910065

>>9909990

>>9910144

Who didn’t ring the bells or take the action? Certainly it was not Berle:

When I called on Berle a couple of weeks later, he indicated to me that the President had given him the cold shoulder after hearing his account of the Chambers disclosures. Although I learned later, from two different sources who had social relations with Berle, that Roosevelt, in effect, had told him to "go jump in a lake" upon the suggestion of a probe into the Chambers charges, I do not recall hearing that exact phrase from Berle. To the best of my recollection, the President dismissed the matter rather brusquely with an expletive remark on this order: "Oh, forget it, Adolf."

The writer is none other than Isaac Don Levine, the man who set up the Chambers-Berle meeting and took part in it. It’s on pages 197-198 of his extraordinary 1975 book, Eyewitness to History: Memoirs and Reflections of a Foreign Correspondent for Half a Century.

One would do better reading Wikipedia than reading Evans and Romerstein on this question:

Berle found Chambers’ information tentative, unclear, and uncorroborated. He took the information to the White House, but the President dismissed it, to which Berle made little if any objection. Berle kept his notes, however (later, evidence during Hiss’ perjury trials).

From Levine we gather that that characterization of Berle’s initial reaction is completely wrong no matter what Berle said later in protection of his party and his former boss, but at least it tells us that Berle informed the president. Even Ann Coulter, of all people, is better on this point than these co-authors:

Berle urgently reported to President Roosevelt what Chambers had said, including the warning about Hiss. The president laughed and told Berle to go f— himself. No action was ever taken against Hiss. To the contrary, Roosevelt promoted Hiss to the position of trusted aide who would go on to advise him at Yalta. Chambers’s shocking and detailed reckoning of Soviet agents in high government positions eventually made its way to William C. Bullitt, former ambassador to Russia and confidant of the president. Alarmed, Bullitt brought the news to Roosevelt’s attention. He, too, was laughed off.

What Evans-Romerstein and Coulter have in common is the short shrift they give to Levine. Coulter air brushes Levine out of the picture completely, never naming the “friend” who set up the meeting with Berle, that it was he who told Bullitt, and not even mentioning that there was a third party present at the Chambers-Berle meeting. Of course, she has no reference to Levine’s book, but neither do Evans and Romerstein.

Now consider what the latter have told us about FDR handpicking the man to go with him to Yalta when, as they relate it, there is no indication of how he would even know who Alger Hiss was…except that he had been informed very authoritatively that the man was a spy for the Soviet Union. Holy treason, Batman!

It is very, very hard to come to any other conclusion than that these two men, who could well be described as America’s leading surviving Red hunters, are covering up for Franklin D. Roosevelt. That impression is greatly reinforced by Evans in a presentation on the book that he made to The Heritage Foundation, which one can listen to here. He is asked specifically about Roosevelt’s complicity in permitting his government to be laced by Communist agents, and Evans attributes it all to FDR’s naivet. Perhaps someone should have also asked him about the failure of the FBI in all this, the people who have the national responsibility for counter-espionage. But the FBI ultimately works for the president. He had the power to make them stand down, and there is every indication that that is just what he did.

>>9910164

>>9910144

>>9910122

>>9910065

>>9910078

>>9910101

>>9909990

Further indication that the authors are covering up for Roosevelt is their failure to mention at all the Soviet defector Walter Krivitsky. Krivitsky, as former chief of Soviet intelligence in Europe, very likely knew a good deal more about Soviet infiltration of the U.S. government than Chambers did. But instead of being embraced and welcomed by the Roosevelt administration, he was harassed by them. In February of 1941 he was found dead of a gunshot wound to the head in a Washington, DC, hotel room. The District police ruled the death a suicide after only a cursory investigation. Who would have had the power to, in effect, make the DC police stand down on this one?

The authors do talk about the very well connected Soviet spy, Michael Straight, who as publisher of The New Republic hired Henry Wallace as editor, but they have no reference to the extremely revealing biography Last of the Cold War Spies: The Life of Michael Straight, by Australian journalist Roland Perry. Perhaps that is because Perry, like Levine in his similarly ignored book, has a lot to say about Walter Krivitsky. Perry even suggests that Straight, a family friend of the Roosevelt’s working for the State Department at the time and feeling threatened, was involved in Krivitsky’s assassination. (See the review by Wes Vernon.)

Another Look at Harry Hopkins

Had the authors not neglected to tell us that Berle had fully briefed FDR in 1939 on the Soviet infiltration of his government, we would read the entire book in a different light, but particularly their Chapter 9, “Friends in High Places.” That chapter talks about Harry Hopkins, Lauchlin Currie, and David Niles, all members of the White House staff. Roosevelt had been informed by Berle that Currie was a Soviet agent. Neither Hopkins nor Niles had been named by Chambers (Niles was not yet in the White House), but Hopkins was so aggressively pro-Soviet and pro-Stalin that one has to wonder how FDR could not have known what would later be indicated by the Venona intercepts and by Soviet defectors. To their credit, in Chapter 9 the authors reveal virtually all the evidence that I have in “Harry Hopkins Hosted Soviet Spy Cell” that Hopkins was a Soviet agent. Unfortunately, they don’t include what is fresh and new in that article, that is, the fact that he hosted that spy cell while he was working at Roosevelt’s right hand. It’s a shame, because it would have strengthened their argument considerably.

Hopkins, like Alger Hiss, was also a very important figure in the sell-out to Stalin and world Communism at Yalta. The following passage is particularly revealing:

Hopkins’s pro-Soviet leanings would be on further display in the Yalta records, where his handwritten comments are available for viewing. Though seriously ill at the time of the meeting, he continued to ply his influence with FDR, who himself was mortally sick and susceptible to suggestion in ways that we can only guess at. After FDR had made innumerable concessions to Stalin, there occurred a deadlock on the issue of “reparations.” At this point, Hopkins passed a note to Roosevelt that summed up the American attitude at Yalta. “Mr. President,” this said, “the Russians have given in so much at this conference I don’t think we should let them down. Let the British disagree if they want – and continue their disagreement at Moscow [in subsequent diplomatic meetings]” (Emphasis added by Evans and Romerstein).

One may search the Yalta records at length and have trouble finding an issue of substance on which the Soviets had “given in” to FDR – the entire thrust of the conference, as Roosevelt loyalist [Robert] Sherwood acknowledged, being in the reverse direction.

It was certainly very late in the day by that point, but FDR for a long time had every reason to know what he was getting from his principal aide Hopkins.

>>9909990

>>9910065

>>9910078

>>9910101

>>9910122

>>9910144

>>9910164

>>9910185

The Tell-Tale Media Role

Chapter 11 is promisingly titled “The Media Megaphone.” Unfortunately, we get only a pecking around the periphery of the sell-out to the Soviet Union during the Roosevelt era. We learn that I.F. Stone with his I.F. Stone’s Weekly was a Soviet agent and that two of the staffers for one of Oliver Stone’s heroes, columnist Drew Pearson, were Communist agents, those being the disreputable David Karr and Andrew Older. Karr was also a speech writer for Henry Wallace. We also learn a little bit about Communist propagandists like Edgar Snow, who was even able to get published in the generally conservative pages of the Saturday Evening Post. “His most famous journalistic effort, and basis for his reputation, was his 1938 book, Red Star Over China, which was for the most part an unabashed commercial on behalf of the Communist Mao Tse-tung.” They also tell us about Michael Straight and his New Republic and remind us of the selling job for Stalin that the infamous Walter Duranty had done in the pages of The New York Times.

When Evans and Romerstein talk about Duranty, though, they are even easier on those to whom he reported than they are on the man to whom Hopkins, Currie, and Niles reported:

Duranty arrived in Russia in August 1921, at the same time as [Armand] Hammer, and over the next decade would establish himself as the dean of Western journalists in the country. After a brief early period of hostility, he would experience a complete conversion and become an avid promoter of the Soviet system. Why he did so is uncertain. It doesn’t appear he was an ideological Communist, as he reportedly had no ideology at all beyond a kind of Nietzschean will-to-power view that didn’t mind dictators and apparently hardened him to scenes of suffering. This would have been useful emotional armor in the Soviet Union in the 1930s, when the suffering was intense and would get more so. (p. 73)

What motivated Duranty? Perhaps Dr. James Mace can clear things up for us a little:

In the 1980s during the course of my own research on the Ukrainian Holodomor [famine] I came across a most interesting document in the U.S. National Archives, a memorandum from one A.W. Kliefoth of the U.S. Embassy in Berlin dated June 4, 1931. Duranty dropped in to renew his passport. Mr. Kliefoth thought it might be of possible interest to the State Department that this journalist, in whose reporting so much credence was placed, had told him that, " ‘in agreement with The New York Times and the Soviet authorities,’ his official dispatches always reflect the official opinion of the Soviet government and not his own."

Note that the American consular official thought it particularly important for his superiors that the phrase, in agreement with The New York Times and the Soviet authorities, was a direct quotation. This was precisely the sort of journalistic integrity that was awarded the Pulitzer Prize in 1932. – "A Tale of Two Journalists: Walter Duranty, Gareth Jones, and the Pulitzer Prize," Ukraine List 203, July 15, 2003.

What a novel idea? Walter Duranty, like Harry Hopkins, Lauchlin Currie, and David Niles, was doing just what his boss expected him to do, or what their mutual bosses expected them to do. Were they so inclined, the authors could have done a much better job of informing their readers had they availed themselves of this writer’s “The New York Times and Joseph Stalin.” They could also have benefitted from reference to Freda Utley’s The China Story and Joseph Keeley’s The China Lobby Man: The Story of Alfred Kohlberg. Evans and Romerstein talk about the influence of the Communist infiltrated Institute of Pacific Relations. But had they referenced these books, they would have permitted us to see the powerful role that The New York Times and the New York Herald Tribune played in spreading pro-Communist IPR propaganda:

Both Freda Utley and Joseph Keeley, the author of the Kohlberg biography, stress the near monopoly the IPR and their pro-Communist friends had over the book publishing and reviewing industry in the United States as it related to China in the critical period of the 1940s.

>>9910122

>>9910144

>>9910206

>>9910185

Starting to get the picture? It's all right there.

>>9910101

>>9910078

>>9910065

>>9909990

>>9910150

That's pretty much Levin's shoah every night. Anti Racism democrats and fake quotes about Hitler. Yawn…

>>9910135

Women have no place in politics or newsrooms. It creates a sexual tension that shouldn't exist. They should be making babies not reading the news.

>>9910068

Rainbow pride flags at all of our embecies. Sorry to break the news bud.

>>9910328

How bout that 20% African American approval rating???

Whoop de fucking do.

>>9910339

This guy gets it.

>>9910308

Yes.

>>9910390

It's sad. Just like blacks and browns still have the tribal loyalty the women have the same feminist beliefs.

>>9910401

Lou didn't lie. 40% is a lie. 8% voted from Trump in 2016. There no chance it's increasing by 32%. 12% would be a miracle. 32% is Kushner bullshit delusional.

>>9910462

The final vote is all that counts and until proven otherwise expect another 8%

Women getting their politicking on

https://mobile.twitter.com/johncardillo/status/1281320681519669250

Here’s how #BlackLivesMatter savages treated Catholics praying the Hail Mary.

Threatening to beat women is the norm for #BLM men.

These guys love showing off that their meetings can be disrupted by a single man, and that this lone man can even threaten their women without anything happening to him.

The Left is tearing down our statues, replacing our holidays, and conquering land— and if we don’t face them with overwhelming might and will in defense of America, then our country will be destroyed and we will be enslaved.

THEY ARE DESTROYING AMERICA and stupid conservatives say “well I’m not racist— but…”

We have to get serious.

They are replacing our statues, our holidays, our heroes, language, culture, even the date when our country was founded. They are replacing our population, they are replacing US!

They are conquering America and replacing it with a new country!

The Trump administration and conservatives in general should be more concerned about tech censorship and silicon valley than they should be about China.

The former poses a legitimate, existential threat to the existence of the American Right and freedom of expression. If silicon valley isn’t confronted then there won’t be much that’s even worth defending from China.

https://mobile.twitter.com/nickjfuentes