To maintain the two realities so that neither on may be destroyed or that both be destroyed. This holds everybody at ransom to yet again another revolution of the communist cogs and wheels which has become our education, local government bureaucrats and judges… Rules for thee but not for me.
Oh do we have a name for it?
Not what I was going for with that metaphor. Um… I I'll try this. To maintain the two narratives so that neither one may be discredited or that both are discredited. Does that help illustrate what I was trying to communicate?
TIME TO GET A CLUE CUNT
>WHICH NARRATIVE IS GOING TO BE DESTROYED?
>
>Q narrative!
>
>and yet, non of the bad journos is going for it, WHY
Hmmm… I really have to consider this. I don't know. I don't have an answer.
There are two Q narratives though.
The one directly from Q, and the one autist actually try to understand and research, put the pieces of the puzzle together etc…
And the one retard faggots on youtube and twitter are completely attaching what ever exaggeration, misconception and famefag complex they have when they fuck up and are wrong?
The narrative Q has dropped won't be destroyed if the question is asked but the shitposting speculative wank fest on youtube/twitter will be. Because they can not compete with actual news organizations in respect to research and investigation and production let alone reach… I don't have any fucking clue. I need a fucking job.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/stephen-hawking/11340494/Stephen-Hawking-pictured-on-Jeffrey-Epsteins-Island-of-Sin.html
"Island of sin" This was fucking back in 2015!
I'm not going to take a shit on the 45th President of the United States.
That's because he is positive. You don't what to push Trump away, you want to draw him in. He will weigh the situation.