Anonymous ID: ddbed4 July 10, 2020, 1:27 a.m. No.9913308   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3322 >>3343 >>3371 >>3492

ok, tried this yesterday, try it again nowโ€ฆ.

 

>there is that one question to ask!

>Q said, to think about the "WHY"

here goes:

 

Why do BAD journos not ask the question?

>because, they can't risk it that this blows wide open

THAN

Why do GOOD journos not ask the question?

>because, they can't risk it right now in the middle of the ops

THAN

Why do BAD journos not ask the question?

>because, they can't risk it that this blows wide open

THAN

Why do GOOD journos not ask the question?

>because, they can't risk it right now in the middle of the ops

THAN

Why do BAD journos not ask the question?

>because, they can't risk it that this blows wide open

THAN

Why do GOOD journos not ask the question?

>because, they can't risk it right now in the middle of the ops

THAN

โ€ฆ.this goes on and onโ€ฆ.

 

you might find the answer to one group (why do bad) or (why do good) but one answer will cancle the other group.

 

think about the "why"

WHY IS NON OF THEM ASKING THE QUESTION

Anonymous ID: ddbed4 July 10, 2020, 1:41 a.m. No.9913348   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

a good amount of 'bots' come from the owner of /qresearch/, so these thread keep bumped and active even on slow days.

These bots are also able to control the converstaion and talking points.

Anonymous ID: ddbed4 July 10, 2020, 1:47 a.m. No.9913372   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

ASKING AGAIN

THINK HARD

Q TOLD US TO THINK ABOUT THE

W H Y

 

Why do BAD journos not ask the question?

>because, they can't risk it that this blows wide open

 

THAN

 

Why do GOOD journos not ask the question?

>because, they can't risk it right now in the middle of the ops

 

THAN

 

Why do BAD journos not ask the question?

>because, they can't risk it that this blows wide open

 

THAN

 

Why do GOOD journos not ask the question?

>because, they can't risk it right now in the middle of the ops

 

 

think about the "why"

WHY IS NON OF THEM ASKING THE QUESTION

Anonymous ID: ddbed4 July 10, 2020, 1:51 a.m. No.9913389   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3393 >>3413 >>3604

>>9913374

>To maintain the two narratives so that neither one may be discredited or that both are discredited.

which would imply that one of the narratives can be destroyed at any given point as soon the question is asked.

 

we know, as good as everyone else, if the quesiton is now asked

WHICH NARRATIVE IS GOING TO BE DESTROYED?

 

Q narrative!

 

and yet, non of the bad journos is going for it, WHY

Anonymous ID: ddbed4 July 10, 2020, 1:53 a.m. No.9913397   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3479

same problem with the "why" we can see with this example (image related)

 

anons, i don't know how to stress these things beside shitpost like a 5 year old, on the other hand, i don't give a fuck!

 

PAY FUCKING ATTENTION TO THE WHY

READ THAT FUCKING IMAGE NOW

AND START TO THINK

Anonymous ID: ddbed4 July 10, 2020, 2:01 a.m. No.9913419   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>3438 >>3471

>>9913413

yes, thought about this too, which brought me to the idea of false narrative played by both side to trick another nation.

 

lets say, the fake news itself is just fake, a narrative played so that it looks from the outside, to another nation (or fuck it, to another space race) as if it was pro-dems, pro-what ever, anti-trump,.. so and and so forth.

 

queston is, who is tricked here?

someone from the outside

china?

Anonymous ID: ddbed4 July 10, 2020, 2:05 a.m. No.9913429   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

a little sidenote, from the gamergate happenings.

 

i remember how i tried to tell a person on twatter to look into this article about gamergate.

You know what the person said to me?

>I can't read this, it is against my religion.

i am not shitting you.

 

keep this in mind.

Because it seems as if, what ever cabal this is, they are not allowed to look into this.

Anonymous ID: ddbed4 July 10, 2020, 2:23 a.m. No.9913479   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>9913471

>who is fooled. Cabal or Us?

if it is us, that would mean OANN is one of themโ€ฆ

all of this sounds a lot like "us vs tehm" propaganda. One thing is sure, they are not taking down trump even so they could see:

>>9913397

 

and meanwhile, they keep their hand off BARR, so he can quitly continue his investigation.

Anonymous ID: ddbed4 July 10, 2020, 2:39 a.m. No.9913532   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>9913528

>Yes, we are the news. If we were not the news there would be no censorship, and no gaslighting

ok, we can test it, and simply force the Q question, this will show us how much inpact we have.

 

lets call it an ops

FORCE THE Q QUESITON