Such a shame you consider the beauty of The Lords creation to be soft-core porn. I find her photo to be very inspiring and not in any perverted way.
>I have no doubts that CDAN is likely an associate of Q+, and not openly part of the Q team; if you get my drift.
Traveling together on the same path, separately.
>Bigger shame that the only thing you see in that woman is her sexuality
I defy you to point to where I said anything along those terms. Ill wait.
>You are the one that went on defense.
You made the claim, defend it. There was not a thing implied. Because you want to make what I said a justification of your own perverse nature does not make you correct. You slander me in an attempt to justify your own beliefs. It is dishonest at best a lie in fact. Get behind me Satan. Have a blessed day.