>>9916548 (pb)

smoocher says the hoax item is notable.

done to defame the board.

remember notables are all tainted with 'baker-push' and that means that they do not represent anything but the mind sludge of despot wanna-bees.

>>9916317 (pb)

this is smoochie baker mind-sludge, and perpetrating a hoax.

it's dangerous to the integrity of those who are long lurkers to not call out the stupidity of these pepole who pretend to be anon and who have hyjacked all the bakes.

for example:

one post insertion troll here:

>>9918759

but here is the deal, we all know that the bakers are smoochie and that these breads are not 'anon' but smoochie baker baker-push insertion spam from a bad-team of creeps who are tyring to hoax that the 'wayfair' hoax come from anon, but it doesn't.

it comes from this team of miscreeant bakers.

who anon have been warning about for months.

Q is proud of anon but not proud of ? ? ?

let Q say who Q is proud of, Smoocher.

anon have been hollaring for weeks that the baker-push tinge is over done.

and the spychologist badgers set out the wolves of mean upon the breads, constant annoyance shills.

to set us all up.

and today they think that they've pulled it off and they can mock the anon.

but the anon don't give a shit what shills think and post.

we know what you did, we saw you do it, and we spoke up about it as you did it.

you don't get away with it, smoochers. We anon did not perpetrate a hoax, you smoochers did.

anon are not smoochers

and smooch are no not anon.

and you fail because we all called you out long before you pulled this crap.we saw you do it, and you don't get away with doing it.

>>9918836

badger.

yes, you are not an anon.