Anonymous ID: 0da998 July 10, 2020, 9:11 p.m. No.9922909   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3473

>>9922692 (/lb)

>>9922836 (/lb)

Reposting:

Now see this right here just made me convert my initially 'healthy skeptic' position about this story, into a 'Wayfair is VERY VERY LIKELY involved in human trafficking' position.

Notice the phrasing Twitter admins are pushing in their artificial trending to describe Wayfair's response to accusations of being involved in human trafficking.

Twitter did not describe Wayfair's response as "Wayfair DENIES it is involved in human trafficking."

No, Twitter takes the hamfisted route here, by choosing a conclusive wording "confirms there is no truth" to the story, and of course the overused fallback cliche C_A 'trigger to shut down talk' spell of 'conspiracy theory'.

These word choices scream out that they are trying to cover something up.

If Twitter wasn't trying to cover anything up, I believe they'd have used a much more neutral phrasing, a 'wait and see' kind of phrasing.

Unless Twitter KNOWS what Wayfair is up to 24/7, they can't possibly know that Wayfair's response of 'no truth' is a "confirmation".

Twitter is in no position to describe Wayfair's response as a 'confirmation' that there is 'no truth'.

The fact Twitter IS pushing the narrative that Wayfair's denial is a 'confirmation' was as if it jumped out of the screen to cover something up.

Twitter pushing the narrative equivalent of 'Wayfair confirms Wayfair is innocent, anyone who says otherwise is tinfoil hat crazy', EXPOSES TWITTER.

I notice Twitter does not describe responses to allegations consistently.

Remember when they pushed the artificial 'trending' about the story (later debunked by ODNI and the IC community) of Russia 'offering bounties' to target American soldiers?

When Twitter described Russia's response, I remember this well, Twitter pushed the trending narrative as "Russia DENIES it paid bounties".

This was no accident.

This was no coincidence.

Describing someone's claim of innocence as a 'denial' has a much different 'optics' as compared to describing that exact same claim as a 'confirmation'.

The former sounds nefarious, shady, questionable, while latter sounds conclusive and case closed.

Twitter did not push the trend "Russia CONFIRMS there is no truth to conspiracy theories it offered bounties to target American soldiers."

With Wayfair's response, Twitter did not even trend a neutral narrative, let alone the tacitly accusatory 'denies' narrative. No, they trended the narrative as if the case is closed, nothing to see here, everyone pay no attention, Wayfair is not involved in human trafficking, and shame on those talking about what is a 'conspiracy theory'.

I am not sure what the technical term for this is, but I know most people know the meaning of one of Shakespeare's most famous lines 'the Lady doth protest too much'.

When I see Twitter pushing a trend that implies a claim to a knowledge they cannot possibly have, the only explanation I can see is that they are trying to cover up a truth, not expose the truth.

Twitter dun fucked up and exposed themselves!

Look at how Twitter is phrasing the damage control.

Anonymous ID: 0da998 July 10, 2020, 9:22 p.m. No.9923026   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3033 >>3043

>>9923008

>JIDF/Mossad(Jewish Internet Defense Force, yes it's a real thing, even though it sounds utterly moronic). These are the only idiots that demand you use the filter

 

Where is the PROOF that NOBODY ELSE other than a tiny fraction of the human race in a tiny location on planet Earth recommend filtering? Did you conduct a survey of everyone on Earth who visits and posts to this site and asked them?

 

>they can't argue the facts

 

Where is the PROOF of the claims you assert as 'fact' for Jews you have never met or even know exist?

 

>so they insist that you filter anything that they don't want you to learn.

 

Where is the PROOF that what you are whining about getting filtered by anons the identities of which you don't know, are from 'JIDF'?

 

>Easy to spot after a few breads, they always use "muh-joo, muh-jew, muhjewshill, muh all jews, jew hater" or any variant thereof.

 

Where is the PROOF that the only people on Earth who ever type on the internet that you idiots are 'muhjoo's', 'muh-Jews', 'muhjewshills', 'muh all jews', 'jew hater', or 'any variant thereof', are located in just one organization in one country on the planet?

 

>(((They))) are LITERALLY THE ONLY ONES that use these terms.

 

Where is the PROOF that 'they are literally the only ones who use those terms'?

 

>They have even gone so far as to call Q a muhjoo.

 

Where is your PROOF that whichever anonymous post on this board that included that statement, are from one city in one country on Earth?

 

I'm in America, but if I typed "you are a muhjoo shill", did I just instantly transport inside a top secret facility on the other side of the planet?

 

>No other "ethnicity" has a force here blindly defending them the way (((They))) (the jews) do.

 

Where is the PROOF that any and all defenses against those accused on this site, could only come from the accused?

 

>The newest gimmick is to call it "24/7 copy pasta".

 

Where is the PROOF that the only people capable of (correctly) identifying your UNPROVEN repeat posts on this worldwide available anonymous site as '24/7 copypasta', can only be located in one city in one country on planet Earth?

 

>once again not arguing the validity of the information, just trying to distract you from it.

 

Where is the PROOF of the 'validity' of the 'information' you're repeating daily on this site?

 

>They are also the ones constantly attacking the board with ddos bullshit and flood the board with cartoon child porn and actual porn.

 

Where is the PROOF that the 'DDOS' and 'cartoon child porn' is all originating from one organization in one city in one country on planet Earth?

 

>Research the history of the jews use of pornography warfare.

 

Where is the PROOF that only Jews push pornography?

 

>They are the resident laughing stock.

 

Where is the PROOF that the 'residence' you're referring to is the only valid/important one?

 

>But they are also all over the internet. YouTube live chats especially.

 

Where is the PROOF that any anonymous post/comment originated from one organization in one city in one country on the planet?

Anonymous ID: 0da998 July 10, 2020, 9:24 p.m. No.9923053   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3070

>>9923043

>JIDF/Mossad(Jewish Internet Defense Force, yes it's a real thing, even though it sounds utterly moronic). These are the only idiots that demand you use the filter

 

Where is the PROOF that NOBODY ELSE other than a tiny fraction of the human race in a tiny location on planet Earth recommend filtering? Did you conduct a survey of everyone on Earth who visits and posts to this site and asked them?

 

>they can't argue the facts

 

Where is the PROOF of the claims you assert as 'fact' for Jews you have never met or even know exist?

 

>so they insist that you filter anything that they don't want you to learn.

 

Where is the PROOF that what you are whining about getting filtered by anons the identities of which you don't know, are from 'JIDF'?

 

>Easy to spot after a few breads, they always use "muh-joo, muh-jew, muhjewshill, muh all jews, jew hater" or any variant thereof.

 

Where is the PROOF that the only people on Earth who ever type on the internet that you idiots are 'muhjoo's', 'muh-Jews', 'muhjewshills', 'muh all jews', 'jew hater', or 'any variant thereof', are located in just one organization in one country on the planet?

 

>(((They))) are LITERALLY THE ONLY ONES that use these terms.

 

Where is the PROOF that 'they are literally the only ones who use those terms'?

 

>They have even gone so far as to call Q a muhjoo.

 

Where is your PROOF that whichever anonymous post on this board that included that statement, are from one city in one country on Earth?

 

I'm in America, but if I typed "you are a muhjoo shill", did I just instantly transport inside a top secret facility on the other side of the planet?

 

>No other "ethnicity" has a force here blindly defending them the way (((They))) (the jews) do.

 

Where is the PROOF that any and all defenses against those accused on this site, could only come from the accused?

 

>The newest gimmick is to call it "24/7 copy pasta".

 

Where is the PROOF that the only people capable of (correctly) identifying your UNPROVEN repeat posts on this worldwide available anonymous site as '24/7 copypasta', can only be located in one city in one country on planet Earth?

 

>once again not arguing the validity of the information, just trying to distract you from it.

 

Where is the PROOF of the 'validity' of the 'information' you're repeating daily on this site?

 

>They are also the ones constantly attacking the board with ddos bullshit and flood the board with cartoon child porn and actual porn.

 

Where is the PROOF that the 'DDOS' and 'cartoon child porn' is all originating from one organization in one city in one country on planet Earth?

 

>Research the history of the jews use of pornography warfare.

 

Where is the PROOF that only Jews push pornography?

 

>They are the resident laughing stock.

 

Where is the PROOF that the 'residence' you're referring to is the only valid/important one?

 

>But they are also all over the internet. YouTube live chats especially.

 

Where is the PROOF that any anonymous post/comment originated from one organization in one city in one country on the planet?

Anonymous ID: 0da998 July 10, 2020, 10:07 p.m. No.9923589   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3600 >>3608

>>9922911

>>9922870

>>9922905

>>9922971

>>9923074

>>9923118

>>9923111

>>9923094

>>9923132

>>9923175

>>9923195

>>9923201

 

WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN WAYFAIR SELLS CHILDREN