REAL NOTABLES
>>9906921 (pb), >>9906340 (pb) Anon discovers which discord namefags run /comms/.
>>9907508 (pb) tl;dr of Findings
>>9909157 (pb) Anon calls out the CCP propagandists by title 'WuMao'
>>9914403 (pb) Creator of qresear.ch defends the comped ChiCom site, pilpuls that this is about notables instead of subversion.
>>9915862 (pb) Bakers Union Doughs deliberately memory hole Anons digs.
>>9918664 (pb) If you filter 000000 then you filter ALL Tor users, not just the one whose post you disliked. Better to filter POST+ on the first Tor post that contains objectionable content, then you don't filter other users who may HAVE to use Tor to get access here.
>Wu Mao tries to trick newfags into censoring the entire conversation
>>9920762 (pb)NAMEFAG BAKER CLAIMS TO PUT BAKERS UNION DAMNING NOTABLE IN DOUGH, LIES
>>9921355, (pb)WU MAO STUPIDLY CONFIRMS WHAT THE CP ATTACK IS REALLY ABOUT
Update to the CCP Bakers Union Saga
>>9919384 (pb)TOP BAKERS UNION NAMEFAG'S MENTOR RON TEEGUARDEN OPENLY ASSOCIATES WITH THE CCP
>>9924320 (pb) Card Carrying Bakers Union Member confirms the truth will not be allowed on Qresearch
>>9928559 (pb) Slide namefag 'Buttfag' defends the CCP Bakers Union
Know something? Tag this post to have it added
What is the /comms/ Bakers Union?, >>9907096 (pb)
A group of namefag bakers that have been nearly exclusively controlling every bake (and every notable) on qresearch for many many months. 'Union' because they only allow one another to bake. To control that they require verified off-board accounts be presented like a union card, like qanonbin.com, created by a baker that namefags as 'newsbaker' because he also created the notables aggregator wearethene.ws. It is connecting the code for qanonbin.com to Ron Cabrera Jr. that exposes 'newsbaker' and his 'frens' Nightbaker, gyb, wake-n-baker, doc strange, tex baker, d2l and others as being associated with lefty, Antifa, Chinese subversives pretending to be MAGA. The board >>>/comms/ is where they pretend to plan, but the updated discord code that reposts Q's posts on discord is strong evidence that they are primarily communicating on discord. >>>/comms/ is just the show. This group solely imposes itself on Anons for their own ends, Anons get NOTHING out of the deal that can't be dealt with otherwise. This is a huge gatekeeping operation that has burned a lot of good Anons and the cancer has to go.
Who do they work for?, >>9919384 (pb)
They're useful idiots for the CCP. Every major power has allied as subordinates of the CCP, from the Vatican (http://archive.vn/680pd) to Israel (they were positioning themselves with the CCP during Obama, surely aware of the 16 year plan). The two guys mentioned as Ronald Cabrera Jr's Mentors got plenty of cabal airtime and publicity to sell their Taoist ideology and their protege's attempted to control the maligned individuals of society, also known as those who's ego's died and become 'Anons'. They are the antithesis of what it means to be Anonymous, that's why it's abhorent cancer that has to go. Not only are they trying to cuck Anons, they're trying (and now miserably failing) to cuck us out of our Country and OUR GREAT AWAKENING.
Why the CCP?
Because since the inception of the CCP, 5 years after the "end" of "WW2", 6 months after theMURDERof the FIRST Secretary of Defence James Vincent Forrestal, it was destined to be the worlds next superpower, the headquarters of the Satanic control structure until Armageddon.
What should we do?
Expose it relentlessly and Pray that God see's fit to make our home whole.
Reminder
Bakers use their controlled opposition persona to 'attack' the bakers and join sides with their legit opposition in an attempt to frontrun actual oppostion. AFLB's limp dicked 'attack' >>9837343 (pb) was supplemented by loli spam and a pathetic DoS that easily makes it so bakers can't bake (due to board setting) and can again pretend to be under attack, further solidifying their victim status. For the lulz, here's AFLB defending the bakers the next night >>9850093 (pb) (ID: ca008e), classic controlled opposition.
>>9906934 (pb), >>9906924 (pb), >>9906981 (pb) Shills come out, fishing to figure out what we can prove exacly. They claim the github is fake they're lying by omission, the repo is the same yes, but you FORK the code from another repo, then CLONE it to your local machine and make code changes. All this 'proves' is that newsbaker did not push his code changes to his public github repo. It also proves shills are trying to discredit this information.