AI must not be controlled by corporations or government.

Instead, "intelligence" must be accommodated within a unique social construct of the people.

And all of us on this board are already part of a social evolution that arrives at this.

"Intelligence" is not just information, but how it is handled, processed and manifest.

We have all arrived here under the duress of natural forces

already developing us towards an ideal we have not yet seen the end of.

But we have all come to already revere the new functionality of it.

This present relationship between white hats, anons, social media and

alternative news already models much of what we are all looking for.

But each of these are only temporary products of timeless archetypes yet to develop

into broader and more functional elements of this "collective social intelligence" to come.

See the thread here: >>989661

>>993087

I see the last one at least got some sass.

We are so persecuted for our intelligence.

That's what deforms the character of this board.

Isn't it great?

>>993146

I think the bigger question here is how are they man sealed?

>>993152

Well, then that says a lot about theirs.

>>993213

I see you agree with the deformation..

>>993232

How can he even think 164 when IQ tests are known to lose accuracy exponentially above 140?

>>993213

But I was talking about intelligence, not intelligance.

>>993475

164 ?

I think the inability to spell intelligence says more like 110 tops.

>>993774

PUULLEEEEEZE !!

You can't spell intelligence and you need a coffee pot.

Let's all note that.