>Not so fast: British PM wants more evidence before attacking Syria

>Theresa May resists calls to join US military airstrikes against Syria

The articles mention: "While Britain and France have not necessarily dismissed the idea of an attack against the Syrian government, it appears that the U.S. President is the only one not willing to wait for more proof."

Is it 4D chess?

https:// www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/may-resists-calls-to-join-us-action-against-syria-kmdg697xg

https:// www.almasdarnews.com/article/not-so-fast-british-pm-wants-more-evidence-before-attacking-syria/

>>994479

Hope so, cuz the whole April 18 "last Israel jubilee year" revelation apocalypse crap being pushed heavily on /x/ seemed to be close to panning out.

I still have a feeling that even if US backs out of the Syria response due to lack of evidence, one of the other players (i.e. SA, Israel, or Iran) will do their own tit-for-tat attack, then a bunch of missiles rain down on Israel, and US gets pulled back into it to protect them, and out comes the April 18 jubilee prediction b.s. show from /x/.