AI must not be controlled by corporations or government.

Instead, "intelligence" must be accommodated within a unique social construct of the people.

Informed and intelligent people are generally anti-social, but their thoughts need increased social acceptance.

And all of us on this board are already part of a social evolution that arrives at this.

"Intelligence" is also not just information, but how it is handled, processed and manifest.

We have all arrived here under the duress of our time that is developing us towards an ideal we have not yet seen the end of.

But we have already come to revere the new functionality of it.

This present relationship between white hats, anons,

social media and alternative news already models what is needed.

Each of these are however, only temporary products of timeless archetypes yet to develop

into broader and more functional elements of this "collective social intelligence" to come.

See the following posts here: >>989661

>>993886

very good.

That is sensient intelligence, not artificial intelligence.

The social model would also be the former.

>>993921

That is sensient intelligence, not artificial intelligence.

The social model would also be the former.

>>994011

But you are saying the same thing.

My point was AI cannot be controlled.

>>994072

Let's just say there is still a line between the two but that both approach an ideal arrived at by more than just logic. The thread I linked opens up with that.

>>994225

My thoughts exactly.

Father-figure discipline is not in the program.

>>994213

It's ashamed what "the handlers" of the music community have done to it in the last decade.

>>994310

But it will be free again.

>>994249

My sympathies as well.

>>994459

Pink Floyd is even harder to get by.

>>994526

This was only 3 weeks in.

We've made huge strides since then.

There was almost no order yet at that point.