Anonymous ID: 721ea9 July 12, 2020, 2:29 p.m. No.9940918   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1568

https://twitter.com/HyperWellbeing/status/1282408959299780608

 

Linked video has English subtitles

Why Did the World Act Upon an Incomplete SARS-CoV-2 Immunologic Picture?

 

Beda Stadler (professor emeritus and former director of the Institute of Immunology at the University of Bern):

  • Asks why was it ever claimed that there is no pre-existing immunity in the population? [Ferguson's model used to justify the closure of economies, schools etc. ignored prior immunity and therefore that up to 80% of the population was not susceptible]

— Not even a single test was carried out in support of the claim.

— Yet claim was made worldwide.

  • The world then aimed to do a “high specificity test”.

— This means it only recognizes SARS-CoV2, not any other coronaviruses.

— But wouldn’t detect antibodies (ABs) that belonged to basic immunity (also known as cross-reactivity or cross-immunity) which protect us.

— Thus critically missing a more complete immunologic picture.

Knut Wittkowski said during an interview [1] that in NYC, cross-immunity is ~25%, T-cell immunity ~25%, and SARS-CoV2 specific ABs ~25% (the third measured with the “high specificity test” that Beda refers to).

 

According to Wittkowski, Hubei, South Korea, much of Europe, the Northeast of the US, already have herd immunity because of the more complete immunologic picture. Other regions may need a month or two.

 

Hyper Wellbeing

July 12, 2020 (4-minutes)

https://youtu.be/AvU1XxYLJN8

 

English transcript and full June 23rd podcast:

https://podcast.hyperwellbeing.com/episode/016-knut-wittkowski-coronavirus-lockdowns-were-a-mistake/

Anonymous ID: 721ea9 July 12, 2020, 3:34 p.m. No.9941568   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9940918

>Why Did the World Act Upon an Incomplete SARS-CoV-2 Immunologic Picture?

some from the interview transcript.

 

Lee: If the lockdown didn’t happen, do you think the hospitals would have been fuller of COVID-19 patients?

 

Knut: No. There’s no indication that, that would have made any difference.

 

Lee: Why do you think governments made this choice?

 

Knut: Because they’re scared because what they had seen in Italy, was that many people died. And initially it wasn’t quite obvious that those was who died were people who were very old, with many comorbidities in nursing homes that were not well managed. And so, it appeared that this would be a flu that is more dangerous than other flus, much more dangerous, and in the meantime, we have learned it is not. Yes, it’s more dangerous for those who are older and have several comorbidities, but otherwise, especially for the younger, for the healthy, for the children, it seems actually to be milder than most other flus have been in the recent past.