Dear Liberal City Council members,

Perhaps you thought it was in your best interest to ignore public opinion and scientific evidence in order to enact "mask ordinances" against citizens. Not only will your NWO buddies not save you, neither will we. Your lowly "serfs" have had enough. We will run, walk, hitchhike whatever, out of you piss poor "shit hole" communities until you bleed dry. If you do not understand the economics of inconveniencing, psychologically damaging, and even physically harming people with degrading mask ordinances you don't deserve to be involved in a functioning economy. Now that criminals walk the streets due to your support of BLM terrorists, what will you do when your downtown areas are vacated, your tax revenue is dried up, and you have totally lost the support of your intended victims of this C_A inspired scamdemic PSYOP hoax? Who will save you?

Anons,

Does anyone know how much of our K-12 education is funded federally? Could the federal government deny funds to school districts that don't fully open as normal in the fall?

Also, I think we need to make the collection of property tax revenue for schools a big issue. Why were citizens not issued refunds for the money not used during "lockdowns"? I think property values in my city will eventually decline (retail property values will crash immediately, imo) due to early "lockdown" and subsequent "mask ordinance". This will surely compromise the ability of liberal districts to provide good schools, etc. Democrats, public health "authorities" and liberal, progressive (read homosexual, child consuming mob) entities are toast, I believe.

Happened to view a copy of the St. Louis Post Dispatch yesterday, due to travel to the area. Two stories caught my eye. Head of a financial company was indicating his business was moving to another part of the country due to the crime in St. Louis (Is all of St. Louis, in a sense, becoming East St. Louis?). The other was a different take on the McCloskeys. Not sure if there was an angle, but the story said they had a history of litigation and even acquired their house after a lawsuit. I guess they are being portrayed as combative people. Not sure that it is germane to their right to bear arms to protect their property, but it goes to show the risks in picking any story and running with it as a "poster child" for a cause. I'm thinking of the George Floyd case as well as this one. Principles are important, picking "poster children" seems to produce emotional rather than rational responses. This is not the first time that I've found national news picking up on a story and portraying it one way when the facts on the ground are different.

https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/506916-st-louis-couple-who-pointed-guns-at-protesters-have-a-history-of-suing

Who will be enforcing "mask ordinances" in "defund the police" liberal enclaves?