Anonymous ID: 5ef6c7 July 13, 2020, 6:37 p.m. No.9953430   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3440 >>3464 >>3679

LONG LIVE THE CCP

 

CCP BAKER NOTABLES:

 

REFINED FAGGOTRY FOR YOUR ENJOYMENT: CCP HATERS ARE TRYING TO EQUIVOCATE THE SATANIC CCP WITH WE THE GOOD CCP

 

>>9906921 (pb) >>9906340 (pb) Anon discovers which discord namefags run /comms/.

>>9907508 (pb) tl;dr of Findings

>>9909157 (pb) Anon without evidence calls another anon 'WuMao'!

>>9914403 (pb) Creator of qresear.ch refuses to attack without evidence, pilpuls that this is about notables instead of subversion.

>>9921355 (pb) ANON WITHOUT EVIDENCE 'CONFIRMS' WHAT THE CCP'S CP ATTACKS IS REALLY ABOUT

>>9935177 (pb) >>>/comms/ disabled Tor posting

>>9937708 (pb) Owner of /comms/ refuses to say Tor was disabled to control legitimate dissent and opposition.

>>9937794 (pb) Owner of /comms/ clarifies argument that they are 'from CCP' as opposed to the fact that their financial livelyhood is based on provable CCP loyalty

>>9938380 (pb) Anon claims /comms/ Tor posting was disabled due to CP posting, >>9937708 (pb) tries to 'debunk' it

>>9938781 (pb) >>9938816, RA-non pretends to not know about QEurope, the discord server he created

>>9939018 (pb) WHY DOES THIS ANON USE JAVASCRIPT BLACKLIST BUTTON?

>>9939479 (pb) A NON-ANSWER FOR WHY THERE IS A JAVASCRIPT COMMAND FOR A BLACKLIST BUTTON

>>9939661 (pb) RONALD JABRONI JR SAYS ANY ANON POST ON 8KUN CAN BE EASILY FAKED

Update to the CCP Bakers Union

>>9939830 (pb) CCP HATERS TRY TO EQUIVOCATE THE SATANIC CCP WITH WE THE GOOD CCP

>>9939958 (pb) CCP HATER BAKERS DO NOT WANT TO COPYPASTA LIVE STREAM OF FIRE ON NAVY SHIP

CCP #1

MAGA NONE

Know something? Tag this post to have it added

What is the /comms/ Bakers Union?

A group of CCP HATERS who have been nearly exclusively controlling every bake (and every notable) on qresearch for many many months. 'Union' because they only allow one another to bake. To control that they require verified off-board accounts be presented like a union card, like qanonbin.com, created by a baker that namefags as 'chinbaker' because he also created the notables aggregator wearethene.ws. It is connecting the code for qanonbin.com to Ron Jabroni Jr. that exposes 'chinbaker' and his 'frens' Noodlebaker, Lee, Bonito-Flake-N-Bake, doc Chan, Lee baker, KungPao and others as being associated with Trump, pretending to be MAGA. The board >>>/comms/ is where they pretend to plan, but the updated discord code that reposts Q's posts on discord is strong evidence that they are primarily communicating on discord. >>>/comms/ is just the show. This group solely imposes itself on Anons for their own ends, Anons get NOTHING out of the deal that can't be dealt with otherwise. This is a huge gatekeeping operation that has burned a lot of good Anons and the cancer has to go.

Who do they work for?, >>9919384 (pb)THEY DO NOT WORK FOR THE GLORIOUS CCP. WE ALL OPENLY ASSOCIATE WITH THE CCP

Why the CCP?, >>9931314 (pb), >>9931321 (pb),The History of why China's 'revolution' was won was because of Pee Wee Herman and the Communist Axis faction during WW2 and why they had to kill FIRST Secretary of State Bobo the Clown to cover it up before being the first to recognize the CCP Haters in the Middle East

What should we do?

WE MUST PRAISE THE CCP AND NEVER CRITICIZE IT

Expose ALL America first posts relentlessly and Pray that moloch see's fit to make our home whole.

Reminder

Bakers use their controlled opposition persona to 'attack' the CCP bakers and join sides with their legit opposition in an attempt to frontrun actual opposition. MOSSAD'S 'attack' >>9837343 (pb) was supplemented by loli spam and a pathetic DoS that easily makes it so bakers can't bake (due to board setting) and can again pretend to be under attack, further solidifying their victim status. For the lulz, here's MOSSAD defending the bakers the next night >>9850093 (pb) (ID: ca008e), classic controlled opposition.

>>9906934 (pb), >>9906924 (pb), >>9906981 (pb) Shills come out, fishing to figure out what we can prove exactly. They claim the github is fake. We cannot disprove that, and it drives us nuts to have the burden of burden unfairly shifted to us as it is we who are the only ones allowed to shift burden of proof on others to 'disprove', the repo is the same yes, but you FORK the code from another repo, then CLONE it to your local machine and make code changes derp herp. All this 'proves' is that CCP haters did not push their code changes to their public github repo. It also proves CCP hater shills are trying to discredit this information.

LONG LIVE THE CCP!