>>9955030

>pre digested by Asian palm civet cats, then harvested from the cat feces by Indonesian children.

I thought that was coffee?

Pretty sure I drank some of that stuff before, because I have a friend who likes to spend other people's money on ridiculously pricey ridiculous things. Like normal coffee tastes fine to me the way it is. Having another animal pre-digest it didn't really enhance the flavor enough where I see any need for me to consume something that something else already consumed then shat out. Let alone pay an obscene amount of money moar than the cost of ordinary beans or even premium ordinary beans. It's not only really gross AF, it's entirely unnecessary. Honestly, if I ordered the expensive beans that a civet shat out and they tricked me and sold me premium coffee beans instead of pre-digested ones, I couldn't even be mad at them, as I'd much rather prefer my coffee beans to not be pre-digested by another creature of any kind.

>>9955116

>Was it bionic?

>>9955146

>Anyone else think she looks like eminem in a wig? I never noticed till this pic. Wtf???

Your definitely not the only one.

Saw stuff floating around, when Q first pointed to Chandler, that implied Chandler and Em were/are/might-be related, somehow. Never really saw anything much other than the speculation based off looks. I'm sure if it was ever "confirmed" people would've collectively shit their pants or whatever it is when normies get together to experience group shock

>>9955214 (me)

Grammar cat give me a pass.

So, I don't give you an aneurysm.

>Your

I know it's *You're.

>or whatever it is when normies get together to experience group shock

or whatever it is that normies do when they get together to experience group shock

My brains been farting out on me, lately. But also I'm half-focused on other things while half-shit-posting here. I'm not in the mood to go full-shit-post, yet. Plus, I'm kinda busy. Not really. I'm just trying to make up as many excuses as possible so I don't look like a total jack-ass moran

>>9955239

>>9955218

High IQ posts

Nay. Stable genius posts!

>>9955435

>Someone in this bread is over the target

Sorry. That might've been me for posting Eazy E

I rarely post Eazy E, 'cause Eazy duz it every damn time

>>9955503

>[I'm becoming convinced that] Q uses project looking glass to view future then uses comms (as one way) to influence/alter future (through us - audience).

The problem with that is when looking into "the future" then acting in the present to influence "the future" one negates "the future" previously "observed" once they've acted in the present.

While some may try to explain the alternate timeline theories, there is absolutely no proof that either timeline exists until present time is directly experiencing and observing "the timeline" we are experiencing. At best, I'd assume we can calculate probabilities. However, are capabilities at calculating probabilities kinda suck considering we run about 60/40 on accuracy of weather "predictions", which have considerably less variables as 7 billion random people doing random things around the entire globe on any given day. True, some things are under a considerable amount of control from moar than just one entity. But still. That train of thought actually supports the notion that it is not actual "time travel" or "looking glass technology", but rather a considerable amount of pre-determined outcomes that can be calculated easier than basic weather patterns.

Not trying to be a Debbie Downer. Just trying to be a Logical Larry.