your post has an authoritative feel. WOWTF are you, if i may ask?
i communicated briefly with a guy in n dakota, surname werner. grandson of nobel laureate alfred. did you know or work with him?
do you really want a direct answer, or shall i deflect?
yes, otherwise i would not have mentioned him. he claimed to be as black as it gets. an invisible non-person. had a presidential GOOJF card.
did you know him?
then how 'bout someone pony up the retainer and we sue the NFL for racial discrimination. 70% of the players and 70% of the starters should be caucasian. anything less is "proof" of discrimination.
go. run with it. i'm an idea guy. not a get the ball rolling kinda guy. you have my blessings.
we talked physics. quite a bit. he was pretty far out but confirmed some of my beginner's ideas. your reply to my rambling speculative shitpost had an air of authenticity that made me think for a moment that you might also be a DARPA type. would you answer an "are you" question truthfully?
i was introduced to him thru a "renegade" physics prof at CMU (no, i never was a cmu student). werner corroborated some of my objections to SRT and GRT, and all the derivative crap that followed. he also validated some of my ideas on QM. he encouraged me to pursue my ideas in mainstream academia, as he was unable to reveal his work because of the nature of his position in adv mil research.
but i am a classic underachiever, for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is i'm basically lazy. and i really don't care to prove my intellect to people unqualified to judge. if i have one special gift, it is to see the errors in other's work. i can spot a logical inconsistency or a self-contradiction a mile away, no matter how deeply buried it is. but i'm not inclined to invest the time to derive the correct result. and now i'm old, and just want to stay at home. but i still get an itch from time to time.
so, you've not said how you "know" so much about time travel. without violating natsec, care to expound on your bkgd?
i agree that the motives of the poster are suspect, but none of the images here are actually pornographic. nudity in and of itself is NOT porn. there are many places in the world where nudity is accepted as normal and harmless. if beauty is in the eye of the beholder, then so is pornography. all you holy roller bible fags, isn't that exactly with the bible is telling you?
And if thine eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee. Matt 18:9
the image is nothing by itself. if you feel offended, that is WITHIN YOU. i don't want to get into the middle of this slide, but some of you anons are protesting just a little too much. are you afraid of your own subconscious thoughts?
you're the one twisting things. i am NOT apologizing for anyone. but pics of naked kids playing at the beach are NOT kiddie porn. get over it.
>Good luck choking on Tyrone's cock
seems like YOU'RE the one who keeps bringing up the subject of perverted sex.
do any of you RAGING FUCKWITS have the mental capacity to SEPARATE the pics from the person(s) posting the pics?
the person posting them obviously has ulterior motives, and is probably a black hat trying to shit up the bread.
but i'll say it again, pics of naked kids playing in the sand at the beach ARE NOT KIDDIE PORN, and if you think they are, then YOU are the SICK FUCK. get help to deal with your subconscious pedophilia.
and you are one hung-up, profoundly repressed self-loathing moran.
so we've called each other names. did it prove anything?
triggered much, snowflake? i'm trying to have a rational discussion and make a point. what are you doing?