dChan
Anonymous ID: 29b898 July 14, 2020, 9:43 a.m. No.9958454   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8554

>>9958327

>>9958399

>>9958304

OK,

This was brought to all yours' attentions when Kelly started endorsing the masks and Remdesivir during the daily WH pressers, and crickets for responses. Some of you even came to defend it.

 

There's another angle here, and we haven't figured it out, yet.

Anonymous ID: 29b898 July 14, 2020, 10:21 a.m. No.9958768   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9958551

Well, if there's something to "get", Chrissy sure is keeping that nugget of wisdom to herself. Having said that, there are some facts, here, to consider:

  1. We don't know who's in the sealed indictments.

  2. We don't know what charges are in the sealed indictments.

  3. Evidence that the public/anons have linking people to trafficking/pedo activity is based solely on circumstantial evidence (this is a fact).

  4. Chrissy was never hot enough to be a supermodel (fact).

 

If Chrissy has something to set folks "straight", she sure as fuck is tight-lipped about it. At this point, we're assuming the only person "clean" in this whole narrative is Donald J. Trump. And outside of what we may/may not learn as a result of any future arrests/court hearings is exactly that; a narrative. A very well constructed one, but a narrative.

 

I stopped the "Q just quoted someone so now I gotta go post on their twitter account!!!!" shit after S8N got pinged by Q. It serves no purpose to let them know we know what we think we know. The only way the real truth comes out is after the Executive Branch actually starts taking some action against the big names.

 

Hundreds of operations have already been dismantled by the feds. You can verify this yourself on the DOJ website. They are taking every single one of them down; working their way up. This should be obvious, by now. By anons constantly harassing these no-talent morons, you're proving you are willing to work on assumptions more than anything else. There have been no proofs of them doing what they are accused of outside of the narrative. Not that all the pieces aren't there outside of direct photo/video evidence, but it's all circumstantial.

 

None of what anons have in their digs could be used to prosecute any of the accused. It does, however, paint the picture clear enough for anons to understand what's going on. It might behoove some of you to actually just sit back and watch what's going to happen in this regard. Just document that she's deleted the 60k tweets, and keep moving on. Bantering back and forth with them could lead to some very embarrassing circumstances in the future. Going into something half cocked usually ends up like that.