The statistical probability of the confluence of events over the past few days against Donald Trump are astronomically low. When put into the context of Deep State motives, they make sense in terms of statistical probability.

First, we have a fire at Trump Tower. Then, that's followed up by the raids on Trump's attorney Michael Cohen, which, when's the last time you saw a raid on Hillary Clinton's home or the DNC to secure hacked servers? These are clear cut messages sent to Trump to get on board with the Israel's agenda or else (and right now, the main priority is Syria).

Don't believe me? Then, remember when whistle blowers like Bill Binney were attacked for going to the Inspector General and threatened with jail by doing so to report illegal activities at the NSA? I do. Today's former intelligence chiefs aren't following proper protocols by going to the IG. They're openly rebelling against the duly elected President. That's right. The intelligence community is openly taking data they swore to protect and are presenting it in open court to challenge the policies of a duly elected President, whose duty prohibits him from being able to answer. Pure, unadulterated third world bull shit.

Now, these events coincide with Trump's effort to withdraw our involvement in Syria. Notice how fast the "Syrian Rebels" aka ISIS faded when Trump cut off funding?? Majority of "rebels" groups in Syria either defected to ISIS or their ideology is just as extreme as the ISIS ideology. Yet, every time someone threatens the logistical support, amazing what happens.

Now, let's look at the first claim of a chemical attack on Syria that forced Trump to launch in air strike in the early days of his Presidency. The alleged gas involved was Sarin. Sarin gas sound familiar? It should. It was so easy to manufacture, even a Japanese cult could manufacture it, as they did just that on the Tokyo subway in 1995. (1/3)

>>996468

The question that should have been asked in that attack was not how dare someone use chemical weapons, but rather who used chemical weapons? Even Jim Matt is thinks we may have screwed the pooch on our judgment in that first attack. http:// yournewswire.com/james-mattis-assad-chemical-weapons/

Now, we're faced with yet another "chemical attack by Assad" (in reality it was perpetrated by Israel/Mossad). This time the gas of choice is chlorine gas, a very common gas that can easily be manufactured. It's been around since World War I, and any nation with basic manufacturing capabilities can easily create it. Use does not prove the party that actually committed the crime. Why would Assad risk American intervention, when the US is on the precipice of withdraw, he's got mop up operations left, & the Russians are providing backup? Why would the Russians permit an ally to draw the US closer to the Syrian conflict when they have other interests in Eastern Europe that they do not want the American guard to go further up?

There is no reason for the Assad regime or their allies to utilize these tactics. However, there is reason & a history of groups who are losing to employ precisely these tactics. Read the UNPROFOR reports from Bosnia regarding alleged Serb atrocities against Muslims. You'll find more often than not that UNPROFOR cleared the Serbs, but MSM reported them as the aggressors. Same thing is happening in Syria. How does something like this happen? Well, it's simple and complex. Interests come together. More often than not, they'll form NGO groups like the Syrian Campaign. Check all the funders of all the pro-rebel NGO's and you'll understand who has the most to gain & why.The NGO's in turn hire PR firms to churn out content and lobby politicians. The content doesn't get challenged because the media has turned into a lazy, bought off propaganda machine. See Fusion GPS. (2/3)

>>996468

>>996477

Politicians see the $$$ from contributions and potential alliances with the money men who finance these NGO's & therefore go along for the ride. How many candidates truly self fund a Presidential race, or even a Senate race for that matter? So, use the public records to see who these PR Firms and their associates donate to politically. You'll then know the elected part of the swamp. Use networking analyses of social media between these PR Firms and the MSM, and you'll know the media part of the swamp.

The reason the PR Firms target the media is to provoke government action. Governments can bring more resources to bear than an individual donation. It's like investing $10 in a stock and watching it go to $25. Take a look at the White Helmets in Syria. They're a creation of the USAID. That's right. Your tax dollars. They're not impartial. They are USG Propaganda. https:// www.alternet.org/world/inside-shadowy-pr-firm-thats-driving-western-opinion-towards-regime-change-syria

To summarize, the Deep State wants Syrian involvement at any cost and wants the American agenda to reflect a globalist outlook and are willing to do anything including directly threatening and undermining a duly elected President to get their way. If you want to stop their efforts, trace the money from source to NGO's to PR Firms to politicians/media & you will find a scandal that makes the Merchants of Death story from the 1920's look like Tiddly Winks.

>>996416

Except it was Israel that did the chemical attack, not Assad.

>>996583