Anonymous ID: 61f711 July 14, 2020, 6:41 p.m. No.9964073   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4137

>>9964011

This would actually be interesting. The problem is, Sessions recused over Mueller. Do the D's have the ability to conjure up another SC to fuck with Sessions again? Then the optics of how to handle a recused, former AG that was very publicly shamed by @POTUS, and sell that [Hammertime] narrative?

Anonymous ID: 61f711 July 14, 2020, 6:51 p.m. No.9964220   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9963997

  1. Nobody gives a fuck about a rich girl with rich problems.

 

  1. Parents all over this country have been shat on for generations.

 

  1. I've personally not accused her of any of it. Just following clues and watching the show. I can't speak for others like like to go on witch hunts.

 

  1. Most of the logs aren't fakes, they are verifiable leaks.

 

  1. You bet there will be. If that scares you, or your friend, it might mean you are in the same circles. That sucks, doesn't it?

 

  1. You are right, your friends are obviously caught up in some seriously fucked up shit; if the circumstantial evidence turns out to be 100% verifiable in a court of law.

 

  1. Nobody's charging admission for this ride. Again, in a court of law, if there are sins against humanity that turn out to be true, then the roller coaster ride was of their own construction.

 

  1. Controlling free speech isn't going to resolve your friends' butthurt. Only presenting the truth and challenging an aggressive narrative with evidence to the contrary is going to work to sway a convinced mass of armchair researchers.

 

8.Get someone in the MSM to ask @POTUS the Q directly. If he disavows it (which he'll have to at this stage, obviously), then it's game over, and Q goes away, and millions of people will be completely ashamed of everyone they ever flung the pedophile accusation at.

 

But hey, at least no one ever accused you fuckers of being SMART.