>>9966193 pb
>>9965790 pb
Have searched for several hours now but cannot find any original sauce from gummi or anyone else on the relationship between covid death rates and HCQ usage.
So i'd agree it's NOTnotable bc not verifiable.
Ironically, a chart like this could be developed ASSUMING one could get solid data on the use of HCQ within each country.
But one thing is clear from my search: that info is very hard to come by.
Bc it's suppressed.
Otherwise there would be more questions, discussions, speculation.
Specialists would be trying to generate uniform data collection methods, so we could generate matching data sets for different countries.
But just didn't see that much. Looks like no one in the med establishment really wants to ask the salient questions in many countries -
scientists do not want to ask the questions, do the studies;
peer reviewed journals do not want publish the results.
Can't prove it but the distinct lack of curiousity is apparent.
There really OUGHT to be a way to generate a proper data set
like the one displayed here -
looking at the relationship between incidence or HCQ use and death rates.
But good luck on actually doing it in a way that's truly legit at this point. Eventually, the data will come out - at least to the extent of showing the effectiveness of HCQ within a given country. Whether we'll be able to meaningfully compare results cross culturally is hard to determine bc i saw no evidence that anyone was trying to ensure that data collection methods are uniform from country to country.
Kek.