>>9968358 PB
I was the poster last night that brought this originally, as a question of legitimacy.
I found it in links on IE7 twitter feed under CJTruth and was concerned since they have been in Q links.
another anon posted thanks and great work and capped the articles into the notable post.
I brought it to the board as a concern with links only, thinking it didn't belong in the threads Q drives us to.
it was a good lesson on the mess this is all becoming and how many are here with bad intentions