The anonymous marriage was disclosed by US Attorney Alison Moe, one of three prosecutors on the case, at Tuesday's detention hearing.
https://www.the-sun.com/news/1140252/ghislaine-maxwell-secretly-married-reveal-prosecutors/
https://www.foxnews.com/us/ghislaine-maxwell-secretly-married-wont-reveal-name
I suspect they know who, but the fact she won't reveal it plays into the prosecutors' case against her.
>GHISLAINE MAXWELL CRAIGIE
Clipped from
The Orlando Sentinel
Orlando, Florida
10 Oct 1993, Sun • Page 272
https://www.newspapers.com/clip/34483628/epsteinmaxwell-marriagecraigieclark/
>https://www.newspapers.com/clip/34483628/epsteinmaxwell-marriagecraigieclark/
I'm still trying to find info anon, but tagged it to the post about Craigie whilst I continue to dig. The newspaper clipping is tagged as "Epstein/Maxwell marriage(Craigie/Clark)"
It may be nothing, and in itself not proof, but may add to the overall picture so felt it worth dropping.
When digging on her companies last year, I noted she used variations of her name (that weren't linked, on Companies House - the UK company registry).
Given that Epstein had multiple passports/identities (to hide his ethnicity alledgedly), why wouldn't she?
Oh, and they're spooks!!
*allegedly
I'm not after a notable, nor a boom. I dropped it for digging purposes as seemed potentially relevant, when I saw other anon's post.
I'm making no claims to veracity.
As to age, if they have fake papers with fake names, you possibly might vary D.O.B.
Spooks would reasonably have access to fake ID, passports etc.