Anonymous ID: 297947 July 15, 2020, 8:54 p.m. No.9975823   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5849 >>5900 >>5924

>>9975780

WTF?

Dis TOR poster not baker unless they are one and the same

gyb here. haven't been on this thread much, barely here. made one notable nom and talked w/another baker bout baking seminar. so what u bitchin' about?

 

>>9975789

still trying to figure out what is different about the two doughs….anybody notice something?

 

>>9975814

baker, what was wrong with the dough you did not like?

Anonymous ID: 297947 July 15, 2020, 9:09 p.m. No.9975939   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5944 >>5970

>>9975849

>>9975900

FUCK OFF FAGGOTS.

 

>>9975924

>Baker, when you make dough changes, please post a note explaining what you changed and why

Exactly.

If this is about removing Q posts, that's legit once they are green. And yes, wnb removed. But I see you have put them back.

Ya don't just revert the dough and then not explain what you did or why.

They'll get removed again tomorrow morning when wnb bakes. Let it go, links are dead.

Anonymous ID: 297947 July 15, 2020, 9:21 p.m. No.9976020   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6031 >>6036 >>6057

>>9975970

>>9975970

>Someone died and made you boss?

I wasn't the one who pointed out that dough changes reversions must be explained, not just made. but this is common sense. It's in the interests of transparency, so anons know why a bread was abandoned mid-bake for a second bread.

 

When baker calls a bread "bad", means nothing. Bad how?

 

You're prolly a shill tho so this post is more for newfag anons who may be confused about 'sup.

Anonymous ID: 297947 July 15, 2020, 9:35 p.m. No.9976127   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6204 >>6216 >>6225

>>9976083

Tx for replying, baker. I see 'sup now. Yes, bakers were discussing the pros and cons of leaving green Q links. I had no opinion, there's no right or wrong on this. If you aren't sure, mebbe ask what's usually done? (In this case, opinions varied.) Or bring it up here with anons during the bake, ask for opinions when you post notes?

Anonymous ID: 297947 July 15, 2020, 9:43 p.m. No.9976197   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6216

>>9976104

>baker under attack

uh….baker ain't under attack, anon.

see

>>9976145

>anons must protect from other bakers. Sadly.

KEKKING.

 

You think baker is a fragile flower who needs your protection? You gonna protect him from 20 minute Q bakes or thread flooding shlll attacks too?

Go back to shill school. Your "sadly" is a TELL.

(still kekking)

Anonymous ID: 297947 July 15, 2020, 9:53 p.m. No.9976275   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9976141

>anons aren't allowed to have work resumes?

For shills, the answer is obviously no. They want to create problems. Coz if there's no problem, there's no paycheck, no anons fighting, no place for NWO.

 

eat shit shills

Anonymous ID: 297947 July 15, 2020, 10:10 p.m. No.9976396   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6424

>>9976362

>done broke the 8 kun

8kun hard to break, could say "try harder"

(If shills can't do it, doubt that bakers can)

Q posts not worth posting on slow breads, imo

Takes a lot of work for something that lasts 10-12 days (i've posted them on /qrb/ til deciding it wasn't worth it since they are available both here and on other sites).

Anonymous ID: 297947 July 15, 2020, 10:26 p.m. No.9976463   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9976424

Sounds good, baker. You're able to help out and also get moar baking practice. Well, i gotta work on dough for baking seminar tomorrow. Stay frosty.

-out