Anonymous ID: 51efbd July 16, 2020, 3:17 p.m. No.9981350   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1392 >>1451 >>1628 >>1638 >>1665 >>1782

Does anyone else think that the Twitter "hack" might have been a message from the white hats to @jack?

The fact that almost all of those hacked are marxists, cabal, or other

black hats makes me think that this "hack" was courtesy of the white hats. Not only did they send a message to @jack and his black hat partners-in-crime that they can hack Twitter, they exposed the Trends and Search blacklists, lending credence to the claims of shadow-banning of conservatives and other divergent thinkers. In addition, the exposure of the internal software panel proves that @jack lied when he testified at the Congressional and claimed that "Twitter does not use political ideology to make any decisions, whether related to ranking content on our service or how we enforce our rules.”

Anonymous ID: 51efbd July 16, 2020, 3:33 p.m. No.9981487   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>9981393

I think you are on the right track. I also thought that it was uncharacteristic for Navarro to go rogue, and I really doubt that he would write an Op-ed without clearing it first, especially not on a topic on which the administration is taking fire from all directions. I think the reason might be a combination of 2 and 3. It will be interesting to watch Fauci's behavior for clues.