>>9986732 (pb)
How do you know that process hadn't begun a long time ago?
Wouldn't it be better if the DS were free to think they were getting away with things, meanwhile the white hats were gathering evidence?
Patience.
Time changes perspective.
So much so, that, imagine how much more evidence has been gathered on events that have been pushed out of the news cycle long ago.
Imagine how much more evidence has been gathered on things the MSM has tried their best to memoryhole.
You know things have gotten weird when you can easily imagine a group of suburban soccer moms "plotting" an "operation" to take back their grocery store, when really they're just being soccer moms thinking they're James Bond.
Funnier still, even THAT would still be considered "threatening" and "white supremacist terrorists" by these totalitarians.
Just look at the ANTIFA people being vanned.
Look at the pressure on China from all sides.
Look at Ghislaine's arrest.
Something is clearly happening behind the scenes in a very methodical fashion.
If the idea is to inflict pain, each one of these situations is tightening the vice on everyone involved, simultaneously.
If you strike the heart of the enemy, wouldn't the hands lose their grip?
You didn't have to, they would do that for you and use it as a false pretense!
>The enemy cannot push a button if you disable his hand
Who gives the order to push the button if the leadership is taken out?
>When you need as many police to catch a lone bowman as you would need to arrest an entire city, you might be shutting down a human hunting estate.
This. If it's a cover story put out by white hats, I have to imagine they're trolling the deep state. Story seems plausible enough to explain to the public why they're there, but just ridiculous enough that anyone who reads between the lines immediately understands.
Yeah, the guy totally went Jason Bourne on those 4 officers, and now we've got a rogue Jason Bourne hiding in a forest versus an army of police officers.
Might as well make a movie out of it right there and then, eh?
As someone who is a big fan of the Hitman games, I have to say that there are certainly some interesting coincidences. Providence/Cabal, 3 families who rule the world/3 sides of Q's pyramid. Deep state panicking because they're being outed and trying to cut loose ends.
At the same time, it's also very generic spy thriller stuff. The whole notion of protecting a NOC list was already done in Mission Impossible. If the developer wants to make as realistic a story as possible, of course they're going to do their research.
He has pointed out some interesting coincidences, but he's taking it to levels where people are possibly going dive down a rabbit hole of digging through the game files just to validate his own little LARP. Then again, not saying he isn't right, either. But it seems like he's gotten a little high off his own supply.
Here's a quick rundown:
You and your opponent are each dealt 5 random cards.
The rarer your combination of cards, the more "valuable" it is.
Let's say your opponent was dealt a 5,6,7,8 and 9 of the same suit (straight flush.)
Immediately, he's going to think he's won, because the odds of you having a better hand are extremely low.
Now, let's say you got dealt a A,K,Q,J, and 10 of the same suit (royal flush.)
You have the single most valuable possible hand in poker, and are guaranteed to win.
But your opponent is operating under the assumption that the odds are so tremendously in his favor that he's already won.
You want to make him think he's winning so he'll throw more of his money into the pot, thinking that he's baiting YOU into throwing more money into the pot.
At a certain point, the betting stops, and he shows his hand. Straight flush.
You show your hand. Royal flush.
You just took everything from him.
Why would you show your hand sooner than it was necessary? (Rhetorical question, but maybe I'm missing something!)
Oh, and I forgot to include the most important part.
In reality, the cards are not drawn at random.
They thought Trump was a buffoon.
They were sure she would win.
They never thought she would lose.
What if they've already lost?
But are just throwing more money into the pot?
How much face can they save to their underlings by continuing to bluff about the strength of their hand?