UK Government Panicking As Fraudulent COVID Death Count is Revealed

Today the public have been told via the mainstream press that UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock is now ‘looking into’ how data regarding coronavirus fatalities is being recorded. This, despite months of reporting by dissenting journalists who have been challenging the official government line raising this issue.

Dying of coronavirus? Or dying with coronavirus. The distinction is crucial, in medicine and statistics. So what do the official figures actually mean? PLEASE read https://t.co/tDMjmWlIBv

— Peter Hitchens (@ClarkeMicah) April 3, 2020

Downplaying a ‘Strange Anomaly’

We’re told all this comes after Public Health England (PHE) confirmed that people who are dying of natural causes are also being counted as ‘COVID deaths’ by virtue of the fact that they had previously tested positive for the virus.

Officials are calling this “a strange anomaly,” but it’s much more than that.

Quite clearly, Hancock and the Tory government are implementing damage control here, as this scandal is rapidly being disseminated across the public discourse, and for fear that the wider scale of the statistical fraud might be revealed.

By calling for a “urgent review,” the Johnson government hopes to avoid a likely backlash from what can only be described as a historic fiasco for Public Health England and Westminster.

All of the governments seemingly half-baked policies – from Lockdown, to shutting down normal NHS services (making it a de facto ‘COVID only’ health service), to nonsensical ad hoc ‘social distancing’ regulations, mass testing, contact tracing, to mandatory masks, to school closures, travel bans and quarantines, to its rush to push-out an experimental coronavirus vaccine – are all predicated on what seems very likely to be false perception that COVID-19 is an unprecedented ‘pandemic’ and therefore requires unprecedented mitigation measures.

It seems that government can no longer hide that it has been counting scores of people who’ve died from natural causes as ‘COVID deaths’. One can only guess just how many deaths have been wrongly recorded in this way.

A source says that, “We noticed that hospital deaths were falling but community deaths were up and wondered why …. It turns out you could have been tested positive in February, recovered, then hit by a bus in July and you’d be recorded as a covid death.”

Essentially, PHE is counting people if they die of any cause at any time after previously testing positive for COVID. So by this government measure, one can never ‘recover’ from the virus. They simply keep the ‘death meter’ running forever, which is effectively padding their statistics and thus justifying any policy which is being drifted out each day.

This can only be described as fraudulent data gathering and recording by health officials, which has unfortunately been swallowed, unquestioningly, by politicians and the mainstream media for the last 4 and half months.

What’s more, these figures are concealing an even bigger scandal – more likely these numbers are driving excess mortality. In other words, the inconvenient truth that most of these are in fact Lockdown deaths, and not COVID deaths.

https://21stcenturywire.com/2020/07/17/uk-government-panicking-as-fraudulent-covid-death-count-is-revealed/

The Global Oligarchs Have Merged With The Global Communists

Well, it’s finally happened.

The global oligarchy has now merged with the global communists, and the only losers, will be the vast majority of the planet’s masses and middle class.

When one sees major American corporate icons such as the NBA kow-towing to Communist China and their sensibilities, or when Communist China starts passing global laws such as their National Security Law § 38 which subjects any and all global citizens to arrest and incarceration for life, merely for speaking out and/or criticizing the state, you know the game is over, and the jig is up.

The same thing happened at the end of the Soviet Union, when that nation state’s leaders and their oligarch minions merged in order to perfect and steal their world’s wealth while being protected by the intelligentsia, military, and police, while rupturing the state like a virus.

The same thing is now happening on a global scale.

The world’s wealthiest simply don’t care about the world’s masses, and they have nothing to fear from the state.

The blame squarely falls on the Anti-Trust Divisions of the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, who for years (mainly under the Obama administration) allowed Big Tech and other massive monopolies to grow so large and uncontrollable, that they can literally depose or challenge any type of governmental activity to curtail their anti-competitive or dangerous monopoly power to completely and totally dominate the masses.

Trump’s Anti-Trust Divisions are no less to blame since we are now 3.5 years into his administration, and he hasn’t done anything about this, either (for him, it seems that swelling the economy with unregulated oligarch wealth/power is better than keeping these oligarchs honest, with a consequently smaller Dow Jones Industrial Average).

The head of the Antitrust Division is an Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust appointed by the President of the United States. Since September 2017, the position of Assistant Attorney General for Antitrust has been held by Makan Delrahim. The heads of the FTC Antitrust Division are also equally useless, ineffective, arrogant, and clueless.

True enough, all of those politicians who promised that they would “take on” various monopolies have all “kissed the ring” and instead taken billions of dollars in lobbying costs, consulting fees, speaker fees, and other mechanisms of legalized bribery of state/government officials, all at the expense of the masses and their children.

Meanwhile they are all in the process of riding off into the sunset, while the rest of the world starves and dies off from coronavirus and other possibly man-made/oligarch made/state made laboratory diseases.

Perhaps this coronavirus was just a “dry run,” and the real plague killing off the majority of the global population is yet to come, while the wealthy oligarchs “stay home” because they can, similar to how bank robbers like to see what the speed of the cops will be by staging a break-in.

Either way, what the American people have to realize, is that their elected officials will not protect them, and neither will their favorite multi-national corporations/oligarchs, either.

They’ve chosen whose side they’re on, and it’s not yours.

Like former President George W. Bush once said while addressing his wealthiest donors, “This is an impressive crowd. The haves and the have mores. Some people call you the elite. I call you my base.”

It seems like global, godless, totalitarian government, is just around the corner (months, not years) unless the masses of the world, and especially America, wake up.

https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/77469/the-global-oligarchs-have-merged-with-the-global.html

Judicial Watch Uncovers Explosive FBI Emails, Appearing To Reference A WH ‘Confidential Informant’

A top government watchdog group obtained 136 pages of never before publicized emails between former FBI lovers Peter Strzok and Lisa Page and one in particular appears to refer to a confidential informant inside the White House in 2017, according to a press release from Judicial Watch.

Those emails, some of which are heavily redacted, reveal that “Strzok, Page and top bureau officials in the days prior to and following President Donald Trump’s inauguration discussing a White House counterintelligence briefing that could “play into” the FBI’s “investigative strategy.”

Moreover, another email sent by Strzok to Bill Priestap, the Former Assistant Director for the Counterintelligence Division, refers to what appears to be a confidential informant in the White House. The email was sent the day after Trump’s inauguration.

“I heard from [redacted] about the WH CI briefing routed from [redacted],” wrote Strzok. “I am angry that Jen did not at least cc: me, as my branch has pending investigative matters there, this brief may play into our investigative strategy, and I would like the ability to have visibility and provide thoughts/counsel to you in advance of the briefing. This is one of the reasons why I raised the issue of lanes/responsibilities that I did when you asked her to handle WH detailee interaction.”

In April, 2019 this reporter first published information that there was an alleged confidential informant for the FBI in the White House. In fact, then senior Republican Chairmen of the Senate Appropriations Committee Charles Grassley and Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Ron Johnson submitted a letter to Department of Justice Attorney General William Barr revealing the new texts from Strzok to Page showing the pair had discussed attempts to recruit sources within the White House to allegedly spy on the Trump administration.

The Chairmen revealed the information in a three page letter. The texts had been already been obtained by SaraACarter.com and information regarding the possible attempt to recruit White House sources had been divulged by several sources to this news site last week.

At the time, texts obtained by this news site and sources stated that Strzok had one significant contact within the White House – at the time that would have been Vice President Mike Pence’s Chief of Staff Joshua Pitcock, as reported.

Over the past year, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, along with years of numerous Congressional investigations, has uncovered a plethora of documentation revealing the most intimate details of the FBI’s now debunked investigation into Trump’s campaign and its alleged conspiracy with Russia.

More

https://saraacarter.com/judicial-watch-uncovers-explosive-fbi-emails-appearing-to-reference-a-wh-confidential-informant/

New Great Looting Of Ukraine

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky came to power claiming that he will put an end to the violence in eastern Ukraine find a peaceful solution to the conflict. Nonetheless, the practice shows that the current situation on the frontline between Kiev forces and the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s Republics (LPR, DPR) is not much better than during the Poroshenko presidency.

Pro-Kiev forces regularly violate the ceasefire regime with the LPR and the DPR, as well as continue attempts to peneterate the frontline and conduct sabotage missions in the breakaway republics. The most recent incident of this kind happened on July 14 when 2 Ukrainian fighers died and another one received injures in a failed attempt to enter the territory controlled by DPR self-defense forces near the village of Zaitsevo. The sabotage and reconnaissance unit tried to attack positions of DPR forces but blew up on landmines in the area.

Another killed ‘fighter for democracy’ was identified by the DPR as a US citizen, Shon Fuller. However, the Ukrainian military denies this claiming that the reports about the death of the US citizen are not true. According to the Kiev side, the second killed attacker was Dmitry Kraznogrud, the commander of the 35th Marine Brigade.

Later, the Ukrainian Defense Ministry also confirmed the death of another soldier – Dmitry Chumachenko, a Ukrainian citizen – near the village of Slavnoe.

The unwilligness (or inability) of Zelensky to move forward towards the peaceful solution of the conflict in the east, the public flirt of his administration with neo-Nazi groups formed and strengthened since 2014, the raging street violence (often conducted by Nazis), political censorship, the deteriorating social and economic situation are the sad reality of Zelensky’s Ukraine. In this light, he’s no different to Poroshenko. These factors and the people’s disenchantment with the ‘new Ukrainian leader’ are the main reasons of the rapidly falling popularity of Zelensky and his government.

This situation allowed former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and his circle to start regaining their influence across the country and on the highest level of the current Ukrainian leadership. Just recently, it was publicly revealed that Poroshenko-era top officials involved in the prepearation of terrorist attacks in Crimea are appointed by Zelensky on top positions.

https://youtu.be/nIqm8shisGo

https://youtu.be/N5WuOlKImwk

https://southfront.org/new-great-looting-of-ukraine/

Former Trump national security advisor John Bolton is a swinger

Ever noticed that many rabid anti-Trumpers are moral degenerates?

Here is another example.

John Bolton, 71, was George W. Bush’s UN ambassador, and briefly President Trump’s national security advisor (April 2018-September 2019) until he “resigned,” reportedly because Trump refused to give into Bolton’s “neo-conservative” war-mongering. Bolton is an advocate for “regime change” in Iran, Syria, Libya, Venezuela, Cuba, Yemen, and North Korea.

See my post, “Why President Trump fired John Bolton“.

After he effectively was fired, Bolton publicly turned against Trump. He wrote a reportedly “scathing” book on Trump that the President’s attorneys are trying to stop from being published on the grounds that the book contains classified information.

In June, in an interview with the UK Telegraph, claiming that Trump doesn’t “represent the Republican cause that I want to back” — read: war-mongering — Bolton said he’ll vote for Joe Biden this November. (Note: Telegraph later amended the article to Bolton saying he will not vote for Trump.)

Crazy Days and Nights (CDAN) is a Hollywood blog run by someone with evident insider knowledge of the “entertainment industry” who calls himself Ent Lawyer (Ent=Entertainment). He says he’s never been sued. He is described by The Daily Beast as having a track record of accuracy. Investigative journalist Mark Ebner said this about Ent Lawyer:

In my opinion, that’s what makes him so impressive, is that no one knows who he is, and he’s being proven right again and again. That’s like legendary shit.

On July 11, 2020, CDAN published a blind reveal that John Bolton is a swinger.

Blind Items Revealed #5 – Reader Blind

July 2, 2020

As he makes the rounds of interviews, this very high profile author/government worker hasn’t been asked about his ex and their swinger lifestyle. He paid her off but there are people out there willing to talk.John Bolton

Posted by ent lawyer at 11:00 AM

So I went on the net to try to verify the blind reveal, and found several reports (Daily Kos, New Zealand’s Scoop News) confirming the reveal.

https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/former-trump-national-security-advisor-john-bolton-is-a-swinger

COVID-19: ‘Putin Hacked Our Vaccine’ Is Dumbest Story Yet

OMG you guys Putin hacked our coronavirus vaccine secrets!

Today mainstream media is reporting what is arguably the single dumbest Russiavape story of all time, against some very stiff competition.

“Russian hackers are targeting health care organizations in the West in an attempt to steal coronavirus vaccine research, the U.S. and Britain said,” reports The New York Times.

“Hackers backed by the Russian state are trying to steal COVID-19 vaccine and treatment research from academic and pharmaceutical institutions around the world, Britain’s National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) said on Thursday,” Reuters reports.

“Russian news agency RIA cited spokesman Dmitry Peskov as saying the Kremlin rejected London’s allegations, which he said were not backed by proper evidence,” adds Reuters.

To make news gathering easier, we should just always assume that Russia has tried to hack everything stored on every computer ever — emails, recipes, Atari consoles — and only report it when anonymous US & UK intel officials determine that Russia has NOT hacked something https://t.co/XfOAbNr7pJ

— Aaron Maté (@aaronjmate) July 16, 2020

I mean, there are just so many layers of stupid.

First of all, how many more completely unsubstantiated government agency allegations about Russian nefariousness are we the public going to accept from the corporate mass media? Since 2016 it’s been wall-to-wall narrative about evil things Russia is doing to the empire-like cluster of allies loosely centralized around the United States, and they all just happen to be things for which nobody can actually provide hard verifiable evidence.

Ever since the shady cybersecurity firm Crowdstrike admitted that it never actually saw hard proof of Russia hacking the DNC servers, the already shaky and always unsubstantiated narrative that Russian hackers interfered in the U.S. presidential election in 2016 has been on thinner ice than ever. Yet because the mass media converged on this narrative and repeated it as fact over and over they’ve been able to get the mainstream headline-skimming public to accept it as an established truth, priming them for an increasingly idiotic litany of completely unsubstantiated Russia scandals, culminating most recently in the entirely debunked claim that Russia paid Taliban-linked fighters to kill coalition forces in Afghanistan.

Secondly, the news story doesn’t even claim that these supposed Russian hackers even succeeded in doing whatever they were supposed to have been doing in this supposed cyberattack.

“Officials have not commented on whether the attacks were successful but also have not ruled out that this is the case,” Wired reports.

https://consortiumnews.com/2020/07/17/covid-19-putin-hacked-our-vaccine-is-dumbest-story-yet/

Florida Labs Acknowledge “Major Errors” After Reporting Positivity Rates Of 100%

There’s a reason for this, you know? It’s because the alleged virus and COVID-19 were never actually separated out and determined to be any sort of new disease. Dr. Andrew Kaufman pointed this out as he sifted through the scientific papers that were written regarding what the American people are being told and for which they submitted to tyranny in a blink of an eye. Still, we continue to get bad information from scientists, doctors and politicians who apparently don’t know a thing about viruses or how they actually work because they have been too indoctrinated via the Rockefeller takeover of medicine. The latest is that Florida labs are acknowledging that there are major errors after reporting 100% positivity rates. See? It’s the biggest hoax in history, people!

This is a modal window.

The media playback was aborted due to a corruption problem or because the media used features your browser did not support.

The Virus Lies & What They Are Leading Towards With Dr. Andrew Kaufman

Decade-Old Document Describes Exactly What We Are Seeing Today

Nurse Kate Shemirani Targeted In The UK For Telling The Truth & Documenting It

Former CBSHealthwatch Reporter: “‘The Virus’ Is One Of The Greatest Frauds In Modern History”

The Biggest Global Hoax In History

Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge has the story:

Florida health officials left COVID-19 trackers slackjawed on Sunday when it reported more than 15k new infections in just 24 hours on Sunday (the data were gleaned from the prior day). But as hospitalizations surge, questions have grown about whether the state is still trying to ‘juke’ its data, something that a now infamous whistleblower alleged before she was fired (she has since started her own COVID-19 data portal relying on public info).

Journalists scouring the reams of daily data for discrepancies have apparently happened upon bombshell they had been hoping for: Orlando Health has just confirmed that some of the data it shared over the weekend were wrong, after journalists reported more than 50 labs showing 100% positivity rate, or roughly around there. One local Fox affiliate looked into the numbers and contacted a few of the labs to confirm that their internal data matched the public data released by the state.

So, there you have it. You can’t trust any of these people when it comes to the so-called “virus.”

https://dcdirtylaundry.com/florida-labs-acknowledge-major-errors-after-reporting-positivity-rates-of-100/

Health Officials in Numerous States ‘Mistakenly’ Included Positive Results From Antibody Tests When Reporting New COVID-19 Cases to CDC

Health officials from numerous states have ‘mistakenly’ included positive results from antibody tests when reporting new Coronavirus cases to the CDC, ultimately inflating new cases.

The Trump administration announced new guidelines on Wednesday. Starting this week hospitals will be ordered to bypass the CDC and send ALL COVID-19 patient information to a central database in Washington DC.

This comes after TGP’s Tuesday report on the likely fraudulent numbers coming from the CDC.

FOX 35 Orlando investigated and found out that countless labs were reporting 100% COVID positivity rates.

Most Florida labs have not reported any negative test result data to the state!

For example, one lab in Orlando, Centra Care, reported that 83 people were tested for COVID and ALL tested positive — this is IMPOSSIBLE!

On Friday, it was revealed that once again, the country’s positivity rate is skewed because positive antibody tests are being lumped in with viral tests for COVID-19.

Fox News contributor and physician Nicole Saphier reported: Health officials from numerous states have mistakenly included positive results from antibody tests when reporting new COVID-19 cases to the CDC, grossly inflating new cases. The scientific equivalent to “double dipping.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/breaking-report-health-officials-numerous-states-mistakenly-included-positive-results-antibody-tests-reporting-new-covid-19-cases-cdc/

Top Gun-Control Group Will Spend $1.25 Million in Colorado After Affiliate Received PPP Loan

Giffords Law Center took small business loan, but its political arm plans to spend big for Hickenlooper

One of the country's leading gun-control groups received up to $350,000 from taxpayers to deal with the fallout from coronavirus, but that has not affected its political arm's plans to spend millions on the 2020 election.

Giffords PAC, one of the largest gun-control political action committees in the country, told Colorado Politics that it would spend $1.25 million on television ads to support Democrat John Hickenlooper's 2020 Colorado Senate campaign. The announcement came just two months after the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence took a Paycheck Protection Program loan worth between $150,000 and $350,000 in order to meet payroll for 16 employees, according to the Small Business Administration.

Congress established PPP loans in March to provide relief to small businesses affected by coronavirus shutdowns, but the taxpayer-backed loans may have been used to support the salaries of workers spearheading Giffords PAC's multimillion-dollar campaign operations. A Washington Free Beacon review of financial disclosures found money has moved between the PAC, Law Center, and a Washington, D.C.-based social welfare arm called Giffords. The PAC has paid Giffords more than $845,000 since March 2019 for everything from staffing costs to rentals. Giffords and the Law Center share staff, according to federal disclosures.

Neither the Giffords PAC nor the Law Center responded to a request for comment.

While advocacy groups routinely commingle money between nonprofit and political operations, the use of taxpayer money could lead to legal trouble, according to some legal experts. Hans A. von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation's Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, warned that the arrangement could prove legally problematic if any of the PPP funds were used to support Hickenlooper.

"To the extent this organization commingles or uses any federal funds in support of a member of Congress because of his anti-gun position, they may be in violation of [federal law]," Spakovsky said. "If they use federal funds for partisan political purposes they could potentially be charged with ‘defrauding' the United States."

Second Amendment activist Alan Gottlieb said the two nonprofits he works with have struggled from lagging donations during the pandemic, but the notion of taking taxpayer dollars did not cross his mind. He called on the Giffords Law Center to return its PPP loans and said politicians should repudiate endorsements from the group.

https://freebeacon.com/2020-election/top-gun-control-group-will-spend-1-25-million-in-colorado-after-affiliate-received-ppp-loan/

New Concern About The Integrity of Science Informing Wireless Policy, Internationally, Among Issues

Massachusetts Led Nation with Caution and Human Rights Protection, and Should Continue to Do So

E-waste rates skyrocketed across the planet in 2019. (See: Electronic waste grew 21 percent in five years https://www.theverge.com/21309776/record-amount-ewaste-2019-global-report-environment-health)

Because Massachusetts was one of the few states that did not approve the grid modernization investment, yet, electric utility meters from Massachusetts, retired before their time, were not in the waste or e-waste stream, in 2019, or in the years before.

In the last decade, many states removed functional analog and first-generation AMR electric meters before the end of their useful life, to deploy new two-way wireless AMI meters and infrastructure. Rather than the 50-year lifespan of an analog meter, the new electric meters, which are essentially computers, are 15-year investments at most, with manufacturers and investors expecting the return on investment of continuous replacement cycles. In addition to electric meters, gas and water meters are being upgraded with wireless nodules and infrastructure to collect and transmit data, 24/7/365.

The transition to wireless meters with reduced lifespans results in unnecessary and avoidable resource consumption, energy consumption, and waste, and well as introducing surveillance and privacy risks. Massachusetts has shown wisdom in its caution regarding the technology, but e-waste, resource consumption, and energy consumption are not the only areas of concern.

Human Rights – AMI meters

The other looming crises are human rights violations and environmental justice issues, which have been brought to light by the convergence of the covid epidemic and racial injustice.

The covid epidemic emphasized society’s responsibility to protect its health-vulnerable citizens.

In fact, the injuries to health that accompanied the initial smart grid installations in 2009, in California and elsewhere, should have been an emergency call to action for a course correction and urgent human rights protections, and a review of the science informing policy decisions regarding wireless technology and utility infrastructure.

Instead, somehow, the urgency to address climate issues and to stimulate the economy justified, what, in hindsight, was a massive error involving wide-scale application of an unscientific outdated conceptual error about radio frequencies, multiplied by lack of oversight and investigation. Meanwhile, those reporting harm were, and are, ridiculed and dismissed. In fact, a member of the Massachusetts legislature referred to a group testifying at the statehouse as “the crazies.”

https://www.naturalblaze.com/2020/07/new-concern-about-the-integrity-of-science-informing-wireless-policy-internationally-among-issues.html

The Return of Jailbreak Liberalism

Defund the police, abolish prisons, use welfare to fight crime: These ideas and more are increasingly the rallying cries of prominent Democrats eager for a revolution in America's criminal justice system.

Criminal justice "reform" has also been embraced on the right, from the Koch brothers to Trump son-in-law Jared Kushner in an effort to buy political cover from bad-faith charges of prejudice.

As municipal leaders dismantle police departments, progressives are preparing to make a grand experiment of jailbreak liberalism. What they would like you to forget is that we tried it before, with disastrous consequences.

The reformers' view is anchored in the belief that crime is ultimately caused by social conditions, and that the only way to fight it is to target "root causes" through social welfare and rehabilitation. The criminal justice system is dismissed as useless and racist.

That framework should be familiar to anybody who lived through the decades following World War II, when rehabilitationist thinking was the consensus among academics, policymakers, and the public. "If in 1960 one had been asked what steps society might take to prevent a sharp increase in the crime rate," the influential criminologist James Q. Wilson wrote, the popular answer would be "reducing poverty, increasing educational attainment, eliminating dilapidated housing, encouraging community organization, and providing troubled or delinquent youth with counseling services."

This mindset drove policy changes. Prisons shrunk and police were treated with suspicion. The incarceration rate declined between 1961 and 1976, and as late as 1981, murderers served an average of just five years. Rapists got 3.4. President Lyndon Johnson's Kerner Commission derided the cops as a symbol of "white power, white racism, and white repression," and the Warren Court shackled them at every turn.

The results rolled in. Between 1960 and 1991, the violent crime rate rose 370 percent. There were more than 20,000 homicides a year for much of the '80s and '90s; at its peak, New York City alone saw over 2,600 murders annually. The weight of this violence fell disproportionately on poor and black Americans, the same groups jailbreak liberalism meant to help.

A change in governing philosophy saved America from the crime wave. More violent offenders were sent away for longer sentences; more police funding and better tactics helped to clean up streets, famously transforming New York City's Times Square.

https://freebeacon.com/policy/the-return-of-jailbreak-liberalism/

'Secure Tolerance': The Jewish Plan to Permanently Silence the West, Part 1

“The promotion of secure tolerance will be permanent and irreversible.”

Moshe Kantor, Manifesto on Secure Tolerance, 2011.

In 2010, Harvard duo Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons published The Invisible Gorilla, which detailed their study of the human capacity to overlook even the most obvious things. In one of their experiments, Chabris and Simons created a video in which students wearing white and black t-shirts pass a basketball between themselves. Viewers were asked to count the number of times the players with the white shirts passed the ball, and many were later very satisfied to find that they were accurate in their counting. This satisfaction was tainted, however, when they were asked if they had spotted “the gorilla.” Amidst considerable confusion, the video would then be replayed for the puzzled viewers, who were stunned to see a man in a gorilla suit walk among the students and balls, take up a position in the center of the screen, and wave at the camera. They’d missed him entirely in their initial viewing. The study highlighted the capacity for humans to become fixated on set tasks, events, or other distractions, and miss even the most elaborate and remarkable of occurrences.

When it comes to Jewish activism, and especially Jewish activism in the area of censorship and mass migration, I fear that the same dynamics are at work. Panicked by this or that website or YouTube channel being defunded or banned, we miss the ‘Invisible Gorilla’ — a plan of action far more horrifying and deadly in its implications than any single act of censorship.

There are essentially two forms of censorship. The hard kind we are very familiar with. It consists in the banning or removal of websites, videos, books, podcasts, and social media accounts. It extends to defunding and deplatforming, and it reaches its apogee in the banning of activists from entering certain countries, in the arrest of activists on spurious grounds, and in the development of new laws with harsh criminal penalties for speech. These methods are dangerous and rampant, and I myself have fallen victim to several of them.

I think, however, that softer, more diffuse methods of censorship are even more insidious and perhaps even more catastrophic. We could consider, for example, the manipulation of culture so that even if certain speech is not illegal and carries no legal repercussions, it nevertheless leads to the loss of employment, the destruction of education opportunities, and the dissolving of one’s relationships. This is a form of cultural self-censorship, involving the modification of in-group standards, that has demonstrable Jewish origins. “Soft” censorship can also take the form of socio-cultural prophylaxis. Take, for example, the recent initiative of the U.S. State Department to initiate a drive to engage in the global promotion of philo-Semitic (pro-Jewish) attitudes. I really don’t believe that this will play out in the manner the State Department hopes, and I watch with interest to see precisely what the methodologies of this policy will be. I sincerely doubt its prospects for success. But what other way can this be interpreted than as a preventative measure, obstructing the growth of organic attitudes that, let’s face it, are more likely to skew to the anti-Jewish? Finally, isn’t it in the nature of contemporary culture, with its emphasis on entertainment, consumption, and sex, to be the perfect environment in which to hide many “Invisible Gorillas”? Isn’t it a whirlwind of fixations and distractions, replete with untold numbers of “woke” viewers happy to report that they’ve been enthusiastically counting passes and have the accurate number? Isn’t it rather the axiom of our time that, from the idiotic Left to the idiotic Right, Invisible Gorillas stroll freely and unhindered, laughing and waving as they go, hidden in plain sight?

https://truthtopowernews.com/secure-tolerance-jewish-plan-permanently-silence-west-part-1-n3883

1/2

>>9989249

But PEP was never ‘independent.’ From its inception it was closely linked to the National Committee for Commonwealth Immigrants (NCCI), a body which worked to advance the cause (and demographics) of Blacks and South-East Asians in Britain, but which was run by a group of decidedly pale, not to mention Hebraic, British-born lawyers. In one of those little instances of lack of accountability in our modern ‘democracy,’ in 1965 the NCCI had been inexplicably appointed to “advise the British government on matters relating to the integration of Commonwealth immigrants.”[6] From its early days of operation, the NCCI, which became the Community Relations Commission in 1968, was staffed with Jewish lawyers like Anthony Lester (1936–). Although never elected to any public office his own Wikipedia entry states that Lester was “directly involved with the drafting of race relations legislation in Britain.” In 1968 Lester founded the Runnymede Trust, described on its website as “the UKs leading independent race equality think tank.” Indicative of the ethnic composition of the Trust, and its deeper origins and goals, Lester had founded the organization with his fellow Jew, Jim Rose. Rose is described in the Palgrave Dictionary of Anglo-Jewish History as the “Director of the Survey of Race Relations in Britain. … The Race Relations Act owed much to him.”[7] So basically, if you see a ‘think tank’ described as ‘independent,’ you can be sure its board reads like a Bar Mitzvah invitation list.

One of the ways in which Lester developed and imposed his influence on the drafting of race legislation was in his capacity as ‘special adviser’ to Roy Jenkins, the far-Left successor at the Home Office of the Frank Soskice who, as mentioned above, is Jewish. With Lester behind Jenkins, Britain had essentially gone from having a Jewish Home Office Minister, to having a Jewish-influenced puppet in the same office. In Race Relations in Britain: A Developing Agenda (1998), Lester himself writes about his involvement (though he is often ‘economical’ with the truth) in the drafting and implementation of race laws in Britain. Of course, Lester downplays his role and that of Soskice, writing that “the arrival, in December 1965, of a liberal and receptive Minister, Roy Jenkins, at the Home Office was of decisive importance in making the Race Relations Act. … When Labour came to power in 1974 I abandoned my practice at the Bar to help Roy Jenkins secure the enactment of effective legislation tackling race and sex discrimination.”[8] He further writes that “every democratic society should be concerned with promoting what Roy Jenkins memorably defined thirty years ago as a national goal: equal opportunity, accompanied by cultural diversity, in an atmosphere of mutual tolerance.”[9]

But Lester wasn’t giving anywhere near an accurate portrayal of his own interest and unceasing activism in the field of race and multiculturalism. For a start, we know that it was Lester himself who penned the influential speech he now attributes exclusively to Jenkins.[10] Further, scholar Peter Dorey notes that Lester was “the leading campaigner on race relations” for the Society of Labour Party Lawyers and that Lester had been at the forefront of the Society’s Race Relations Committee when it put pressure on the government for harsher legislation in 1966.[11] Illustrating the true nature of the relationship between Lester and Jenkins, Dorey cites correspondence between the two in which Lester castigated the 1965 law as a “shoddy job” and in which Lester presents Jenkins with a “shopping-list of discontents: the Government should commit itself to extending the race relations legislation to cover all public places, as well as employment, housing, credit and insurance services, and it should strengthen the Race Relations Board.”[12] Dorey notes that it was in response to pressure from Lester, channeled through Jenkins, that “the Government began to reconsider its race relations policy.”[13]

2/2

“Secure Tolerance”: The Jewish Plan to Permanently Silence the West, Part 2

2012–2015: The National Statute for the Promotion of Tolerance

Between 2012 and January 2015, Dinstein and three other experts on constitutional law, backed by Kantor’s ECTR developed a draft 12-page pan-European “tolerance law” for adoption by the European Union. The law was intended to “criminalize ‘group libel,’ such as negative stereotyping, target group-to-group intolerance, and ban neo-Nazi and other discriminatory organizations in Europe.” On January 27, the draft legislation debuted at the European Jewish Congress, then meeting in Prague, with Kantor presiding and throwing his “support behind the proposal, which would grant harsher punishments for hate crimes against Jews, Muslims, Roma, women, and LGBQT alike across the continent.” Minor complaints came from Alan Dershowitz and Bernard Henri-Levy, who believed that an educational (indoctrination) strategy would be a more effective (safer for Jews) way of pursuing an end to anti-Semitism. Dinstein (and, one would presume, Kantor), according to Times of Israel, was “undeterred by the criticism, insisting that he would continue to promote the legislation to European governments, in the hopes that like Holocaust denial criminalization, which he said was initially perceived as a “pipe dream,” the tolerance law will ultimately take root.”

Dinstein’s document, innocuously titled “A European Framework National Statute for the Promotion of Tolerance,” [full text here] but also known by the name “Model National Statute for the Promotion of Tolerance,” was designed to legally implement Kantor’s ideological proposals as outlined in the 2011 Manifesto for Secure Tolerance, and made provision for the explicit criminalization of “overt approval of a totalitarian ideology, xenophobia or anti-Semitism.” It proposes to make “education in tolerance” mandatory from elementary school to college. All governments will be legally obliged to ensure their schools “introduce courses encouraging students to accept diversity. … It is very important to start such courses as early as possible in the educational programme, i.e. in elementary school.” The same measures will have to be imposed in the education of the military and the police, and for the entire professional class within society.

The statute also makes it a legal obligation for every EU country to ensure that public broadcasting “devote a prescribed percentage of their programmes to promoting a climate of tolerance.” It asserts a legally binding commitment that: “The production of books, plays, newspapers reports, magazine articles, films and television programmes – promoting a climate of tolerance – will be encouraged and, where necessary, subsidized by the Government.” Mass media will be completely given over to the development and dissemination of pro-diversity propaganda:

The Government shall ensure that public broadcasting (television and radio) stations will devote a prescribed percentage of their programmes to promoting a climate of tolerance.

The Government shall encourage all privately owned mass media (including the printed press) to promote a climate of tolerance.

The Government shall encourage all the mass media (public as well as private) to adopt an ethical code of conduct, which will prevent the spreading of intolerance and will be supervised by a mass media complaints commission.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2020/07/14/secure-tolerance-the-jewish-plan-to-permanently-silence-the-west-part-2/

1/2

>>9989290

The key Jewish counter-argument is to assert that speech itself can be harmful and that “the audience” can be harmed merely by exposure to it. In practical terms, Cohen-Almagor contends that James Fields drove his car into a crowd at Charlottesville solely because he was exposed to hate speech — not because of his mental health, situational factors that day and immediately prior to his conduct in the vehicle, or because of catastrophic policing failures. Why everyone else “exposed” to “White supremacist hate speech” didn’t engage in similar conduct is left unexplained. Instead, we are to agree with Cohen-Almagor and his Jewish colleagues that “hate speech should not be dismissed as ‘mere speech.’ … The preferred American liberal approach of fighting ideas with ideas, speech with speech, is insufficient. Hate speech needs to be taken more seriously by the legal authorities than it currently is.”

Just as the James Fields episode is extrapolated exponentially to define an entire movement, so the issue of “hate speech” and censorship is based on an extremely small number of exceptional cases. Cohen-Almagor claims that “internet hate can be found on thousands of websites, file archives, chat rooms, newsgroups and mailing lists,” so one might assume that his methodology and argument would involve a wide range of examples where these thousands of sources are linked to thousands of instances of violence and criminality — particularly since Cohen-Almagor argues that “White supremacist” websites are “like terrorist groups.” The problem, however, is that he does no such thing, because there are no such examples.

In order to present even the most tenuously relevant research, Cohen-Almagor relies purely on unsophisticated comments from a handful of the most extreme and obscure racialist sites on the internet, and even here the author fails to provide a single instance where a White racialist website has suggested any acts of violence. So inconsequential and amateurish were such sites that by the time of writing his article Cohen-Almagor has to concede “quite a few sites discussed here are now defunct.” Having initially made a small directory of such sites, he admits the “vast majority of the web pages in that directory are no longer operative.” It is surely a damning indictment of the state of modern peer-reviewed academic journals that someone could publish an argument against the principle of free speech solely on the basis of the putative content of obscure and minuscule internet sources which are no longer even in existence.

In fact, Cohen-Almagor can’t even come to a fixed and satisfactory definition of “hate speech” or “hate sites.” This is presumably by design, with the intention that the topic is plagued by so many gray areas that any future legislation in the area is, like all existing examples of hate legislation, destined to be rhetorically capacious enough to ensure easy arbitrary interpretation by those in control. Early in his essay he asserts that “Hate speech is intended to injure, dehumanize, harass, intimidate, debase, degrade, and victimize the targeted groups, and to foment insensitivity and brutality against them.” But he also later endorses a definition of the Alt-Right, which is routinely portrayed by Cohen-Almagor and his Jewish allies as a body of “hate groups,” as merely “critical” of “multiculturalism, feminists, Jews, Muslims, gays, immigrants and other minorities.” Criticism thus becomes conflated with hate. It goes without saying that there is a crucial difference between the two definitions, and it is in the gulf between these two definitions that these activists seek to destroy freedom of speech. Mere criticism may not “injure, dehumanize, harass, intimidate, debase, degrade, and victimize” anyone, but the existence of a legislative framework privileging minority interpretations of such criticism will surely consign it to hate speech categorization.

2/2

“Secure Tolerance”: The Jewish Plan to Permanently Silence the West, Part 3 of 3

2018–2020: Big Tech/ Big Capital/ Big Jew/ Big Brother

A key step towards making dissident thought unlawful, and ensuring “Secure Tolerance,” is the effort to represent it, in its totality, as culturally illicit. As early as 2015, Brian Marcus, head of the ADL’s Internet Division, had been contacting Internet Service Providers (ISPs) with threats that allowing “hate” material on their service “would be bad for their business.”[1] Backed with reports, policy proposals, and “recommendations” from their own alphabet soup of think tanks and solo Jewish intellectuals like Cohen-Almagor, the ADL and the European Jewish Congress began more widespread intensive lobbying of tech companies in late 2018. The acceleration of lobbying against Big Tech should be seen in the broader context of heightened activism for the implementation of “Secure Tolerance” more generally.

Although the ADL and YouTube had co-operated since at least 2008, intensification of this relationship in early 2019 culminated in YouTube changing its content policy. Jonathan Greenblatt announced the ADL had “been working with technology companies, including YouTube, to aggressively counter hate on their platforms. We were glad to share our expertise on this and look forward to continuing to provide input. While this is an important step forward, this move alone is insufficient and must be followed by many more changes from YouTube and other tech companies to adequately counter the scourge of online hate and extremism.”

The international Jewish strategy to bring the ethos of “secure tolerance” into tech culture again involved the high-level involvement of American Jewish groups in Europe’s “democratic” institutions. For example, in May 2015 the American Jewish Committee’s Transatlantic Institute (note again this constant reliance on a motley of Jewish ‘think tanks’), launched a fervent lobbying campaign at the EU with the aim to “detoxify social media. … Internet Service Providers are free to—and should—exclude raw hate speech.” Just to make sure the message was sent loud and clear, the AJC even hosted its main 2015 “Strategy Conference on Combating Anti-Semitism” in Brussels, during which the “AJC unveiled an action plan for European governments to address the intensifying crisis of anti-Semitism.” This, then, is our “democracy” — unelected, uninvited American Jewish groups presenting “action plans” (lists of demands) to a bloated, corrupt, and unaccountable bureaucracy.

• • *

Britain’s Jewish “Community Security Trust” (CST) has, since 2016, been working, again in an unelected and unaccountable capacity, with the European Commission on a “social media illegal hate speech monitoring” project. The CST was able to use the semblance of official authority given to it by this alliance to pressure social media companies by sending them regular performance reports on how well they were doing in removing CST-blacklisted speech from Twitter, Facebook and Google. In yet another stellar example of democracy in action, the unelected and unaccountable CST had earlier claimed the credit for developing “the EU Code of conduct on countering illegal hate speech online.” The code was imposed on Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, YouTube, Instagram, Google+, Snapchat, Dailymotion, and Jeuxvideo.com, following the CST’s accusation that they were “not adhering to anti-hate speech laws across Europe.”

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2020/07/15/secure-tolerance-the-jewish-plan-to-permanently-silence-the-west-part-3-of-3/

1/2

>>9989324

multiculturalism have become mainstays of modern advertising as the Racial Endgame nears its conclusion and the West commences its death rattle. You might ask, when you see rainbow-package Doritos, what tortilla chips have to do with sodomy, but that’s only because you’re suffering from a tolerance deficiency, and the best way to correct that is to admit White privilege, buy a Starbucks, and go try on a new pair of $200 jeans at Macy’s. Critique, Tolerance, Sterility and Usury have converged. This is the necessity of anti-Semitism.

In light of all that has been discussed, we could add that “Secure Tolerance,” Big Tech, Big Capital, Big Brother, and Big Jew have converged. The final result will be the achievement of Jewish censorship across the West, a “permanent and irreversible” cycle of laws and repression, and the theft of our children’s future. Like Milton’s Satan, these groups will declaim in favor of equality and democracy, only to later wield the tyrant’s scepter in Hell.

Conclusion

How to finish such a pessimistic essay? It’s true that the information presented here is disturbing, infuriating, confusing, and heartbreaking. Can any practical lessons be derived from it?

One clear pattern observed in this essay is the overwhelming reliance on “think tanks” and similar bureaucratic vehicles for the intrusion of harmful Jewish influence into our “democracy.” Jews, even with their very significant financial power, rely on the magnification of their rhetoric, interests, and grievances through such bodies in order to accomplish their goals. This is where they can and should be challenged. Who is granting access and power to these groups? Can existing legislation be used to prevent the intrusion of these bodies into the democratic process and, if not, can new legislation be proposed to do so? The closest the dissident right ever came to a think tank was the National Policy Institute (NPI), which despite its name, and while fulfilling an important movement function, didn’t really produce any policies. At the present time, our movement clearly needs talented legal minds and institutions to unpack existing legislation, and develop new legislative proposals that, even if not explicitly racial, can seriously hinder the movement of harmful Jewish groups through the political body of the West. There is a serious lack of infrastructure of even the most basic kind, and we simply aren’t going to make any progress until this problem is addressed.

The second lesson from this survey of developments is that social media is likely to become an increasingly compromised and dangerous place for activists. In Europe, new laws are probably a few years away, but the broader plan will almost certainly eventually envelop Canada, Australia, and, despite apparent belief that the Constitution is invulnerable, even the United States. Already American legal scholars have developed arguments for curtailing the First Amendment in the case of “hate speech” (see, e.g., Jeremy Waldron, The Harm in Hate Speech (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012), and it is widely believed that a liberal Supreme Court majority would adopt such reasoning. The clock is probably already ticking on internet anonymity, and the example of Germany indicates that direct police involvement in “speech crime” is on the horizon. Off-line activist methodologies should be increasingly explored. Failing that, radically alternative modes of using internet networking should be considered. For example, even if someone uses a completely outrageous Twitter handle, complete with comic book avatar, most people still have their entire lives online (job, home town, friends, likes, hobbies, vacations). Don’t forget who ultimately has all of this information, and the organizations that will increasingly be able to access it.

It’s becoming very apparent that social media is itself a form of social control. We now have the ability to identify someone in a crowd simply by cross-referencing a photo of their face with available internet information. In seconds they can be identified, their employer can be contacted, and their loved ones can be harassed. In a strange way, despite the atomized condition of postmodernity, we have social control levels approaching those of the middle ages. We have new forms of social shaming, and new forms of the public pillory. Dissident activists who face overwhelming costs if they are doxxed would be well-advised to reduce their internet presence to the bare minimum, in effect, deliberately fading themselves into obscurity, thus making their life harder for the Zionist-Globalist panopticon to search for and penetrate. Remember who you were before you became an employee number, a Facebook profile, or a Twitter handle, and protect that person like you’d protect your child or other loved ones.

2/2

IMF Made Loans to Belarus Conditional on a Lockdown. Lukashenko Turned Them Down

"We will not dance to anyone's tune" was the precise response

Additional conditions which do nto apply to the financial part are unacceptable for Belarus, Belarus President Aleksandr Lukashenko said when speaking about external lending during a meeting to discuss support measures for the real economic sector on the part of the banking system, BelTA has learned.

Aleksandr Lukashenko asked the participants of the meeting how things were with the provision of foreign credit assistance to Belarus. “What are our partners’ requirements? It was announced that they can provide Belarus with $940 million in so-called rapid financing. How are things here?” the head of state inquired.

At the same time, he stressed that additional conditions which do not apply to the financial part are unacceptable for the country. “We hear the demands, for example, to model our coronavirus response on that of Italy. I do not want to see the Italian situation to repeat in Belarus. We have our own country and our own situation,” the president said.

According to the president, the World Bank has showed interest in Belarus’ coronavirus response practices. “It is ready to fund us ten times more than it offered initially as a token of commendation for our efficient fight against this virus. The World Bank has even asked the Healthcare Ministry to share the experience. Meanwhile, the IMF continues to demand from us quarantine measures, isolation, a curfew. This is nonsense. We will not dance to anyone’s tune,” said the president.

https://www.anti-empire.com/imf-demanded-lockdown-as-a-condition-of-loan-to-belarus-lukashenko-turned-it-down/

https://eng.belta.by/president/view/belarus-president-unwilling-to-accept-additional-terms-to-get-foreign-loans-131164-2020/

COVID-19 – Remdesivir: License to Kill. Hydroxychloroquine: Prohibition to Cure.

Remdesivir’s fight against Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is somewhat symbolic of the fight of medical journals, of corrupt institutions against field medicine, of the many general practitioners who are at the bedside.

Remdesivir is an expensive molecule, owned by a pharmaceutical company, Gilead Sciences Inc. In the race for a miracle cure for COVID-19, Gilead is trying to win because it can make a lot of money [1].

1] Hydroxychloroquine is a royalty-free, publicly available and very inexpensive molecule. In other words, although it was originally manufactured by a pharmaceutical company, Sanofi, it will not benefit the industry and therefore will not benefit all the people corrupted by it.

Remdesivir’s fight against Hydroxychloroquine is the symbol of the fight of false medicine, big money medicine, against evidence-based medicine, a medicine that can bring big money to the patient (his health), at little or no cost to society.

Hydroxychloroquine (a treatment defended by Professor Raoult in Marseilles, France, among others) is said to be ineffective in COVID-19, even dangerous [2].

This is simply not true. [2]

There is ample evidence that Hydroxychloroquine, whether or not combined with azythromycin and zinc, is effective in inhibiting viral replication in SARS-CoV-2, with a completely satisfactory safety profile, especially for physicians who are used to and authorized to prescribe it. These molecules, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, have been known for decades [3]. This is the truth.

Conversely, it is said that Remdesivir is effective and without any particular danger.

This is not true.

Remdesivir can cause severe kidney failure (requiring dialysis, kidney transplant), liver failure, genetic mutation, heart problems up to cardiac arrest, among others [4]. This is the truth.

On the one hand, the [fake] Lancet study [which was retracted] was trying to demolish hydroxychloroquine [5], on the other hand, the New England Journal of Medicine praises Remdesivir [6-7].

In a previous article, I wrote that what the former editors of these journals say is what we should think: corruption and lies at every level [8].

[8] For all doctors of integrity, true scientists, the public, this could even become a criterion of analysis: when a “big” medical journal praises a drug, beware! When it demolishes a treatment, then you’d do well to take an interest in it.

Remedying Hydroxychloroquine is still a big money story.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-remdesivir-license-to-kill-hydroxychloroquine-prohibition-to-cure/5718844

Recovery Narrative Falls Apart As Third Of Small Firms Cut Workers To Survive

Deep economic scaring from the virus pandemic is a major subject that cannot be ignored. From permanent job loss to the collapse of small businesses, these two things suggest the shape of the global recovery could resemble an "L" or "U."

Already, three million American jobs have been eliminated, and small business bankruptcies are surging as over 50% expect to be out of businesses within six months.

The prospects for the US economy nevertheless, the global economy, in the back half of the year to undergo a "V" shaped recovery is quickly fading as virus cases surge in North America.

A new small and medium-sized business survey by Facebook, in conjunction with the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the World Bank (first reported by Reuters), has found one in three small firms around the world cut their labor force in May to survive the virus-induced recession, outlining the economic damage of mass layoffs in the Western world is expected to crimp consumption.

https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/recovery-narrative-falls-apart-third-small-firms-cut-workers-survive

White Helmets co-founder stole aid money destined for Syria

As Western governments opened their checkbooks for the White Helmets – a controversial ‘rescue organization’ in Syria – their co-founder used the cash to top up his wage and even finance his wedding, according to a Dutch report.

Days before he plunged from a window in Istanbul to his death last year, White Helmets co-founder and British mercenary James Le Mesurier admitted to defrauding Mayday Rescue, an organization that fundraised for the anti-government rescue group in Syria.

According to documents seen by Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant, Le Mesurier told an accountant sent to audit the charity’s books that he forged receipts for $50,000, pretending that it was sent to finance an evacuation operation in Syria. Instead, the money was paid to Le Mesurier himself. In addition to paying himself a salary of €24,000 ($27,414) per month, Le Mesurier dipped into company cash to finance a lavish wedding in Istanbul in 2018, and to issue loans to his new wife, former diplomat Emma Winberg, the report claims.

The accountant sent to investigate Mayday found that “tens of thousands of dollars in cash” were withdrawn to pay for the “fairytale wedding.”

Meanwhile, governments across the Western world were lining up to support Mayday, and channel money to the White Helmets. According to a 2018 report by the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the organization took in $127 million between 2014 and 2018, with only $19 million of this haul coming from non-state donors. The government of the Netherlands paid out almost $11.5 million in this period, while similar donations flowed in from Germany, Great Britain, Canada, Qatar, and others.

Despite being hailed as fearless rescue workers, the White Helmets have been accused of partnering with Al-Qaeda. Operating exclusively in rebel-held territory, the group’s members have been photographed posing with jihadists and have been accused of staging chemical weapons attacks to draw in Western forces against Syrian President Bashar Assad.

https://www.rt.com/news/495092-white-helmets-founder-fraud/

Vast, subterranean Iron Age temples linked to ancient kings of Ireland discovered

An international team of experts have uncovered a vast temple complex they believe may have been the one-time ceremonial center of prehistoric Europe, at a site with deep roots in Irish folklore and mythology.

Researchers from Northern Irish, Scottish, and German institutes uncovered a vast subterranean temple complex at Navan Fort in County Armagh in Northern Ireland, believed to have been the former seat of early Ulster kings.

Our discoveries add significant additional data, hinting that the buildings uncovered in the 1960s were not domestic structures lived in by kings, but a series of massive temples, some of the largest and most complex ritual arena of any region of later prehistoric and pre-Roman northern Europe,” explained Dr. Patrick Gleeson of Queen’s University Belfast.

Gleeson described uncovering “a series of figure-of-eight buildings of the early Iron Age and a 40m timber-ringed structure constructed (around) 95 BC,” explaining further that this massive timber building would have, upon construction, been filled with stones and burned to the ground to form the ceremonial mound we see today.

The temples and residences were detected in a non-invasive survey which employed state of the art remote-sensing technology which detects magnetic signatures and electrical resistance of the soil to reveal that for which there was previously no trace above ground.

The area is closely tied to Irish folklore, located in the ancient capital of Ulster and one of Ireland’s five royal sites of five of prehistoric origin, closely linked with myths like the Táin and story of Cú Chulainn.

The actual excavation of the site will require significant funding which has yet to be secured, though the nearby visitor center is likely to be abuzz with curious history buffs when it reopens to the public on July 30, having been closed during the coronavirus pandemic.

>>9989444

SAUCE

https://www.rt.com/news/495063-iron-age-temples-discovered-ireland/

Government-funded museum pulls ‘racist’ anti-white graphic from website

A taxpayer-funded museum of black history and culture has removed a chart describing a list of wholesome behaviors as white supremacist microaggressions. However, the museum remains committed to “deconstructing” whiteness itself.

The National Museum of African American History and Culture is a Smithsonian institution, and received some $33 million in government funding last year. At least some of that money went toward illustrating a chart describing a number of American virtues – including hard work, timekeeping, the nuclear family and delayed gratification – as traits of “whiteness.”

The chart, compiled by a white Jewish academic and corporate consultant, was displayed on the museum’s ‘Talking about Race’ web page, until the museum pulled it on Thursday, following a conservative outcry.

Claremont Institute president, Ryan P. Williams, described the chart as “divisive propaganda.” Even the Washington Post’s Marc Thiessen said that the document was “quite frankly…racist,” for assuming that “black people don't possess these characteristics.”

However, “whiteness,” as defined by the chart, is still treated by the museum as something that causes “everyday microaggressions toward people of color,” and must be deconstructed.

https://www.rt.com/usa/495102-museum-racist-anti-white/

Planned Parenthood affiliate tied to fetal organ harvesting took $7.5 million stimulus loan

Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties' possible participation in illegal fetal harvesting schemes was thrown into sharp relief when prosecutors found that DaVinci Biosciences had engaged in 'illegally selling fetal tissues for valuable consideration.'

A Planned Parenthood affiliate in southern California that received a major coronavirus bailout earlier this year has a history of association with fetal harvesting scandals, as well as an incident in which an infant survived an abortion only to quickly die within the institution's medical facilities.

Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties was the recipient of a $7.5 million loan from the Paycheck Protection Program, a feature of the federal economic stimulus package passed earlier this year. That was the largest loan among $80 million received by Planned Parenthood outlets across the country.

The Small Business Administration, which was tasked with distributing the PPP loans, said in May that those funds had been improperly awarded to Planned Parenthood and that the organization would have to return the money.

PPOSBC, meanwhile, has a history of involvement with several scandals involving the sale of aborted fetal remains, while one of the nonprofit organization's officials has admitted under oath that at least one baby survived an abortion in their facilities only to die shortly thereafter.

'They kept it warm and comfortable'

Video of a sworn deposition of Jon Dunn, the president and CEO of PPOSBC, was released late last month by the Center for Medical Progress, an anti-abortion group known for its explosive series of undercover videos that revealed Planned Parenthood officials appearing to admit participating in the trafficking of aborted baby body parts, a federal crime.

In the footage of Dunn's deposition, the executive is asked if he has "ever had born alive cases" at his affiliate.

Though Dunn initially responded that "to the best of [his] knowledge, no," he subsequently admits: "One time maybe 20 years ago, I don't honestly remember, there was such a situation, and I was made aware of it."

"The fetus wasn't viable and expired very quickly," Dunn said. "Staff were upset about it, but there was nothing that could be done. The fetus was not anywhere near viable."

"I have only a vague recollection of it," he continued. "I know they kept it warm and comfortable for the very brief period that it was alive. I don't think there was even time to call 911. It was a matter of seconds."

Dunn's testimony, given in May of 2019, occurred several months after Virginia Gov. Ralph Northam defended the act of potentially allowing babies who survive third-trimester abortions to die.

https://justthenews.com/accountability/planned-parenthood-received-7-million-covid-loan-connected-fetal-organ-harvesting

>>9989540

>>9989487

Wear your mask backwards, then you're not breaking the law. No one said it had to cover your mouth

ICC goes on summer break without ruling on investigation against Israel

The ICC does not have a due date to make a decision.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague went on its summer break on Friday without reaching a decision on the war crimes investigation against Israel.

Israeli officials, accoring to Walla! News, have estimated that the decision will only be made after the vacation on August 13.

The ICC does not have a due date to make a decision, and so it seemed likely that the situation would come to fruition.

Some theorize that the US and Israel delayed an announcement on annexation due to the ICC investigation so that such a decision would not be in direct violation of the ruling of the court.

The US, in particular, has been vocal against the ICC, placing sanctions against the organization it claims has no jurisdiction to hear the case on Israel.

https://www.jpost.com/arab-israeli-conflict/icc-goes-on-summer-break-without-ruling-on-investigation-against-israel-635438

>>9989249

>>9989280

amazing how you read so fast.

We see you and your sneaky ways.

>>9989650

About time Q week has been balls

>>9989670

And you return on the 17th

Nice

this shit again