Multiple spellings intentional. Much easier to commit white collar fraud. Paper identities.
No that's not me….I don't spell my name that way. Plausible deniability.
Multiple spellings intentional. Much easier to commit white collar fraud. Paper identities.
No that's not me….I don't spell my name that way. Plausible deniability.
…Who plays the coachman and Stromboli in the big show?'
The Darker Corners of Pinocchio
He offers gold to his pawns who now seem completely terrified of him as he whispers his plan to traffic the kids off to a nice little place called Pleasure Island. Honest John was not nearly as terrified of Stromboli.
And behind these already dark explicit overtones the movie makes, it cleverly hides something darker, even for adults. The best way to hide something dark is to coat it with something dark. Seeing a dark coat makes many think that there is no need to look behind something already so explicit. But there is something notorious about the evil Coachman. He is not just some big wealthy guy who puts kids to work in salt mines after turning them to donkeys which apparently symbolizes their stupidity. He is also a pedophile.
https://the-artifice.com/pinocchio-darker/
Do you remember when he tossed JE out of his resort?
You are missing the key details. He chose not to be in the "club". He knows better than anyone what is going on in these circles. Now just look what hes doing about it….DRAIN IT.
Many IRL characters seem to fit the roles however Harvey Weinstein seems to fit Stromboli the best.
Are we looking at architecture of how they operated?
you are right…. the nameless puppet masters are the targets lazed up. Could be in for a interesting weekend.
Also interesting its about to be re-released 2021 a "darker" version if that's even possible.
Guillermo del Toro wished upon a star, and Netflix just granted him his Pinocchio movie. But is a stop-motion wooden boy story the right move for the Best Picture winner?
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1488589/
I did notice that…..There is a lot going on in that post. The thing that jumped out at me was [massive cyber-power] attacks [attempts] on 11.4 (or after 11.4)
In past 11.4 referenced network segments. Dates, Mirrored its 411 (information).
they way they worded cyber-power stands out for some reason. Attacks via cyber infrastructure? (that would be the first thought) Much has been done to try and secure these infrastructures however the tech is inherently flawed and protecting power grids and power generation (coal, dams etc…) will be challenged if attacks occurred. Mitigation would have to occur at lower layers of the networks packet inspection levels with traffic profiling established.
I was kinda thinking along the lines of power = energy. Energy manipulated / modulated in a negative frequencies / vibrations to cause harm or neuro interference via our compromised technology. Still looking into connections that align. Cyber-power meaning doesn't seem to line up for some reason with initial logic.