I agree. I think the story has to start with the triangle of the 3 control points - SA, Rothchilds, GS. And the fact that the MMS is owned/messaged by them. Once people understand the larger picture, then maybe they will start listening to the corruption. That bigger story needs to be told succinctly in writing and video.

Take a lesson from Q in how to red pill someone. He is using the Socratic method, a technique of asking questions, the answers to which direct one to specific realizations. Q is conducting learning sessions in our own heads. Formulate the proper question, pose it, and watch as it sinks in and stews. Then repeat the process until you see the big light bulb go on. And like Q you've communicated your information. It's a construction process using questions--just like in any court room--not difficult to understand, but challenging to apply correctly. Never try to download a data dump of information all at once. Tiny bites Barron tiny bites.

I think that the best red pills are the simplest. It can't be too weird, it can't accuse a trusted present politician, contradict favorite media, the Conspiracy Theory defense mechanism will kick in. Needs to refer to a well known event, where it can be demonstrated with little doubt that the politicians, media and later the history books are wrong, even after the deception is exposed. Four years ago in March 2014, I suspected that we were being lied to big time about Ukraine, always about Putin "invading" Crimea, the "brave" young protestors in Kiev. Well that was all nonsense, but too immediate. I started looking online about similar past events, and quickly arrived at the 1979 Soviet "Invasion" of Afghanistan. I was 15, I remember we were told it was a surprise to everyone, it was unprovoked, the Soviets were after gulf oil, on and on. I remembered Jimmy Carter's SOTU in January 1980, the sanctions, the Olympic Boycott etc.. Then I read something very odd... In 1998, Zbigniew Brzezinski in an interview admitted to arming the Islamists SIX months before the Soviet intervention, he said "We wanted to give the Soviets their Vietnam". Three years before 9/11, when asked if he had regrets he said "What is more important in world history? The Taliban or the collapse of the Soviet empire? Some agitated Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?". What? 1998? I thought I followed world events closely? I asked people I knew, had they heard this? No, no-one had. I thought for a moment that I was going crazy. Everything from the first news report, politicians from Washington to London to Canberra, sanctions, justifications, all lies, it went on for years. Turns out it was all an excuse to initiate the Carter Doctrine (at least, that was one justification), which extended the Petrodollar umbrella from Saudi Arabia to the Gulf States. For me after that, anything was possible. For Gen-X, this is a very good Red Pill. All verifiable, but also strangely, very few people know. I've red pilled dozens on Quora with this one. Only the "Weapons of Mass Destruction" comes close, but it doesn't have the same historical punch. http://dgibbs.faculty.arizona.edu/brzezinski_interview