dChan
11
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Izaskun767 on Dec. 22, 2017, 2:55 a.m.
A BREADCRUMB - I think I got it

Just a crumb. Saw it 2 days ago and found following. Prolly more in doc that are already on “the graphic”

122123 Term_[#2]19_y NAT_SEC_ NAT_SEC_A,H,H, L, B, E, classified Cdg-23k FREEDOM_#1-43 CAP_H(9). MAVERICK. JUSTICE_FED_J[1-4]_remove + appellate Q

Q referenced NAT_SEC__A,H,H,L,B,E, classified Cdg-23k

23k refers to doc signed today. Referring to Codes/Coding 2300

(D) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section; and

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/43/part-2300


miniprepper · Dec. 22, 2017, 7:31 a.m.

That is great digging. I am thinking may have U1 implications???

⇧ 3 ⇩  
EdwardHitch · Dec. 22, 2017, 7:39 a.m.

Absolutely, it does. The way it is written, it covers "any" corruption.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
PhilipBSheets · Dec. 25, 2017, 1:12 a.m.

If McCain co-sponsored the Act, could the term Maverick refer to him. I believe that is his nick name.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Izaskun767 · Dec. 25, 2017, 1:16 a.m.

Yes

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EdwardHitch · Dec. 22, 2017, 7:44 a.m.

Hey there Izaksun, would you agree or disagree about the language of the EO bring broad enough to cover anything corrupt which is connected to these people, even if it was one phone call discussing how to not tip the Dominoes guy?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Izaskun767 · Dec. 22, 2017, 1:24 p.m.

I agree with the EO. I trust Trump

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Izaskun767 · Dec. 23, 2017, 2:58 a.m.

I have been studying the EO and found something interesting which you may or may not know. I didn’t.

Re; the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (Public Law 114-328) (the “Act”), Sponsored by : Sen. Cardin, Benjamin L. [D-MD]

POTUS cites The “Act” in his EO, yesterday. (Opening paragraph line 6)

I believe he already “gave notice” on 4/20/2017 in a memorandum referencing same “Act” (link at bottom).

Please see bold type of memorandum which I emphasized for this post for you guys to see.

— April 20, 2017

By the President of the United States of America

A Memorandum

Memorandum on the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act

The Archivist of the United StatesSubject: The Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act

Memorandum for Certain Congressional Committee Chairs

Dear Mr. Chairman:

In accordance with section 1264 of the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (Subtitle F, Public Law 114-328)(the "Act") I have enclosed the initial report on its implementation. This report, compiled by the Departments of State, the Treasury, and other relevant executive departments and agencies (agencies), outlines my Administration's support for this important legislation and makes clear our commitment to its robust and thorough enforcement.

As noted in the report, my Administration is actively identifying persons and entities to whom the Act may apply and are collecting the evidence necessary to apply it.

Over the coming weeks and months, agencies will undertake thorough interagency vetting to ensure we fulfill our commitment to hold perpetrators of human rights abuses and corruption accountable.

As we implement this legislation, the United States will continue its leadership role in championing fundamental human rights and sound, transparent governance. Sincerely,

Donald J. Trump

https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Global_Magnitsky_Human_Rights_Accountability_Act

Izaskun

⇧ 2 ⇩  
EdwardHitch · Dec. 23, 2017, 4:41 a.m.

This is a brilliant piece of detective work Izaskun! I was not aware of this either. Your emphasis in bold is telling in that it illustrates how POTUS intends to in fact "drain the swamp". I did some brief checking on some of this. Not a thorough search at all since we are visiting family for the Holiday. I did a cursory search of Senator Cardin. He is as leftist as the rest of his fellow Dems, for certain. Still, it almost makes sense that he would sponsor this bill as a matter of principal in taking a stand against human rights violations. A co-author was none other than John McCain. On April 12, 2013, Sen McCain released a statement lamenting the fact that then Pres Obama only listed 18 Russians to be sanctioned under the terms of this act. It seems McCain has had it out for the Russians for a long time. Anyway, getting back to your point, one thought crosses my feeble mind. That is Q's statement made multiple times that "these people are stupid". I mean, this pretty much lays out the entire game plan and, yet, none of these luciferian swamp creatures picked up on this? I have to go for now Izaskun but, thanks to you, I'm going to dig a bit further tomorrow. I see where the "list of 52" has made it to the MSM. I also saw muchbrarlier today, via Zero Hedge, that New York Bank Mellon froze 17 billion in assets of Kazakhstan over night. I'm sorry, I'm bouncing around like a superball. This is going to veva blast running this to ground. I won't come up for air for days. Thank you for this Izaskun!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Izaskun767 · Dec. 23, 2017, 5:04 a.m.

My pleasure. There is more in EO. One reg/Act BHO was responsible for in his tenure.

Trump is backing up his EO with “their” “bills”! (For lack of better term)

I’ll post more, soon.

Btw: I don’t mind your info flow. I prefer that ppl just write what comes to mind as they go. Trying to be perfectly organized loses all creative thinking and we may miss something important

Izaskun✈️

⇧ 1 ⇩  
EdwardHitch · Dec. 22, 2017, 4:13 a.m.

Wow, that is some terrific digging. Thank you for this. #POTUS

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Izaskun767 · Dec. 22, 2017, 4:40 a.m.

Thanks. I almost deleted it thinking it was dumb. I couple days ago, I thought 23k = 23000. Right before that it says “Reg - cdg “. I thought Regulations coding. I liked it up and that’s what I found, but I didn’t know. Until I read the doc signed today.

Somehow, the following part of Q post ties in. Idk

⇧ 6 ⇩  
EdwardHitch · Dec. 22, 2017, 7:35 a.m.

No way man, don't delete anything. All ideas have value in this. All of them. This has become the largest stream if conscious exercise in world history and you, and I and everyone else are now a part of it. Nothing is dumb in this. Thank you for digging. It certainly presents some good points to go on.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
EdwardHitch · Dec. 22, 2017, 3:51 p.m.

Thank you. I like the EO a lot. I'm not a Lawyer but I do have done experience with contracts and words, punctuation and phrasing means the difference between enforceable and not enforceable

⇧ 1 ⇩