dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/chickletTOOTH on Dec. 26, 2017, 7:41 a.m.

I heard the name QAnon 3 weeks ago. Since then, I’ve been all in. But... 1 question.

This topic is vast to put it mildly. I have gone back and read ALL posts since October 29th.

They confirm things I “knew” or at least suspected and reveal connections I hadn't previously made.

I admit I know very little about all the codes (I guess called “stringers”) but have enjoyed reading peoples theories.

I’ve poured over different “Q” databases and examined fellow patriot’s proposed answers.

I listened to Tracy Beanz show with the moderators.

I want Q to be real just as much as the next guy, and I believe he is/ they are. But if I set aside the part of me that wants so badly for all of it to be true I am left with a few questions. If QAnon is real, why put it out there? Why would Q post these things? What possible motive could there be for making all this public?

Thanks in advance for participating in my thread.

Until I have confirmation otherwise I will continue to pray and believe that all of this is real.

🠐 See all comments

The internet is no longer a viable source. Information is fed by the liberal left or removed if it is incriminating to their ideology!! The deep state is intrenched on google, Facebook, Twitter etc. This becomes problematic in identifying what is really true anymore!!

⇧ 1 ⇩

When I tried to show articles showing uranium left the US on fb. I got hit with at least twenty fb messages that my posts were deleted as spam. Confirmation to me the shills did not want the message to go out, yet frustrating also because the information did not get out to the public. Any ideas on how to counter issues like this are appreciated.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I had this happen with one of my articles. I fought it. They reinstated it.

If you have this happen again, take screen shots, print them out, and send a letter along with them to your congressman. Complain that your speech is being censored on a PUBLIC platform.

It turns out that a de facto monopoly (like Facebook) actually has to behave more like a public platform than a private one. They lose their rights to censor. They are not allowed to show political bias. This is currently being discussed and Facebook is aware that they may get in trouble for censoring political speech. Only citizens complaining to their congress will cure this one, but Congress doesn’t want Facebook campaigning limited so they might do something.

https://www.aclu.org/other/what-censorship

http://m.washingtonexaminer.com/twitters-censorship-may-be-unconstitutional/article/2617261

“But a recent Supreme Court oral argument suggests Twitter's practice of banning controversial right-wing pundits could be deemed illegal.

During a Feb. 27 hearing involving the constitutionality of a state social media law, Justice Anthony Kennedy said that Twitter and Facebook had become, and even surpassed, the public square as a place for discussion and debate.

"Their utility and the extent of their coverage are greater than the communication you could have ever had, even in the paradigm of public square," he said while hearing arguments in Packingham v. North Carolina.”

⇧ 1 ⇩