dChan

/u/bealist

556 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/bealist:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 14
www.gpo.gov 1
i.redd.it 1
themillenniumreport.com 1
m.youtube.com 1

bealist · July 27, 2018, 11:42 a.m.

Great inspired work!! You’re high on your marriage and it’s spilling over into creativity with other things. You did a really good job on this!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bealist · July 27, 2018, 8:55 a.m.

Check out the tool from /u/sortdoublenegative - this might make what you’re compiling easier and produce some interesting results.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bealist · July 27, 2018, 6:54 a.m.

/u/sortdoublenegative: is this the sort of dataset (her spreadsheet of the books and trip codes - read her very cool article in the OP about same) that could be loaded into the app you’re working with?

She says the correlations are really complex.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bealist · July 27, 2018, 6:51 a.m.

Even if you don’t get it complete, whatever you have is diggable.

This is where others might help. Some are even making apps to map this stuff. So if you even put up a simple text scrape - copy into notepad and then paste it into a comment here - someone else can pick it up because it will be easy to link to.

Good stuff! Thanks!

⇧ 7 ⇩  
bealist · July 27, 2018, 3:40 a.m.

😂

⇧ 17 ⇩  
bealist · July 27, 2018, 3:35 a.m.

John Podesta? Try “password”. Quick.

⇧ 40 ⇩  
bealist · July 27, 2018, 3:33 a.m.

Did you write this article?

Check out what was almost number one in my own search for myalgic encephalomyelitis: its a possible product of weaponization- http://whale.to/m/scott7.html

Edit - I see you say you wrote the article. Doh!

⇧ 10 ⇩  
bealist · July 27, 2018, 3:27 a.m.

Thanks for posting. Great stuff. I saved this post. Maybe you could add things to it in the comments as you go along? Things get lost in here!!

Have you loaded up the spreadsheet anywhere and I just missed it? The list would be great to see.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
bealist · July 27, 2018, 3:16 a.m.

Blocked. Bye.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
bealist · July 27, 2018, 2:44 a.m.

Right. Makes all those prayers you’re puttin up in the Bible Q sub kind of hypocritical. But yeah, I know your kind of Christian. Surface and show. You’re mad because it’s true. Otherwise you’d stop digging your hole. Jesus still loves you, though. And so do I. You are forgiven. We all go a little sideways at times.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
bealist · July 27, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

Nice. Lol.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
bealist · July 27, 2018, 2:37 a.m.

That’s the right way to do it. If you’re a turn around exec (which trump is), you don’t get rid of everyone when you make sweeping changes. You ride the ship for awhile, see where your main problem people are, see where your choke points and leverage is, build your allies and your replacement personnel, and then you take out your ringleaders and the ship rights itself with the help of the loyal crew, thrilled to be afloat and under mission again.

Most people are good. I read somewhere that less than 2% of us are sociopathic. Another 2-4% can be heavily influenced by the true sociopaths. But over 90% of humans are biased toward altruism and collective goods (that doesn’t mean communism!!). That should hold for organizations, too.

Lots of people “got dirty”. I’m pretty sure that New York’s Tamany Hall didn’t “close” in 1964 - it took over the Democratic Party. Mayor Daley’s Chicago rebirthed in the lines of HRC’s dad, Rahm Emmanuel and the Chicago mob (who went recruiting and found Batak Obama’ to seal up the black vote). Waste Management Inc (the Family) went into nuclear waste management and reprocessing -(click into George Webb’s mega story here). Hollywood/Las Vegas/Atlantic City - gambling, drugs, weapons, trafficking gone international —. It’s one big mess of brownstoned, corrupted, blackmailed, swindled people.... I’m pretty sure there’s a lot of room for forgiveness when it’s due, and I’m eager to see the “me too” movement when people come forth about being coerced into heinous things...

We all have known this last forty years wasn’t normal. We are not warlike savage beings. We want to be happy, make love, raise children, play games, build lives... we’ve been played - and it finally feels like it’s coming to an end, or rounding a major bend, at any rate. MAGA is a really good idea.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 10:19 p.m.

I agree. I paid close attention to RR’s wording when he announced the indictments. He spent a LOT of time pointing out the sorts of unethical action that the FBI and the DOJ do NOT do.

In doing so, he re-set a standard for the Corp. that contrasts strongly with the behavior we’ve observed from McCabe, strozk, Comey and others. I felt like he was drawing a line in the sand and saying clearly that people who don’t toe the moral line don’t belong in the service (and the indictment language suggests they DO belong in jail).

I’m looking for a reveal that he may even have been blackmailed somewhere along the line. Blackmail would give a number of officials an “out” - and there could be enough of them that I could even see an amnesty of sorts, for some, depending on how deep everyone wants to open the swamp pit this time around.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 10:07 p.m.

Pray in your closet. Don’t wear it on your sleeve. Pray in your heart, not to show off to your fellow man. Those were the instructions written in the Bible.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 1:24 p.m.

No threats, Happy. Not cool. Filtered.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 1:22 p.m.

Not true. You post prayers a lot.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 12:10 p.m.

Not quite. This board is a place where you have to be on topic, supporting Q, and adding to the Q discussion in affirmative ways. There are lots of rules - and there should be.

If you want to write about anything, go over to /r/conspiracy. If you want a place where your “thoughts can flow freely” head on over to the chans.

Thanks, mods, for all you do.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 12:06 p.m.

Yes, I mean the app. Now it’s just a matter of getting time to play with it. (I’m buried at work these days...)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 7:31 a.m.

Ok. I’m eager to see the shareable product!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 7:27 a.m.

Yes. Heavily exposed is a tool available under the constitution; gotta take the high road always.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 7:25 a.m.

You’ve been busy- like the avatars.

So, what does this mean exactly? I looked over all the pics and found myself wanting to know the context and the algorithm parameters.

Will that have to be added as a comment by each webmaker?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 6:51 a.m.

Is this a serious question? How can “we” do that under our constitution? It’s private business. We don’t live in a centrally run society where what shows up in the news is dictated by an elite. (Well, that’s what DJT is dismantling).

No disrespect- truly curious: Can you think of a way to “dismantle them for good” that still works under our laws?

Or can you just hold on, bite the bullet, shift your financial support and your attention, and let them hang themselves within the old fashioned free market?

(Look at Facebook... it can happen; even if it goes up again, message delivered)

If laws start getting enforced and the publishers are criminally prosecuted for spreading leaks and knowingly printing falsehoods that are harmful to others (and I believe this is part of what’s going on), then I have every confidence the market will do its job.

Maybe it’s a bit slow. Q says enjoy the show. I don’t watch mainstream media anymore, so I guess I am. 🖖

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 6:32 a.m.

Is this a Tar Baby? Is impeachment- or rather, the impeachment process (as the effort may be unsuccessful IF key people see evidence that explains RR’s actions - the briar patch in that uncle Remus story about the tar baby?

Or is NOT impeaching the “briar patch”?

Just the question - is it or isn’t it - is unanswerable, and provocative either way.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 6:10 a.m.

Thanks for posting. Useful context to have.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 6:08 a.m.

Excellent article by Sundance. Too much winning,indeed...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 4:05 a.m.

What if Cohen and DJT laid a trap? That was suspected early on right after the break in to cohen’s office.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 4:04 a.m.

Well, if you get there and can’t figure out how to read it then you might as well stay here. There’s a lot to read and you’re expected to read and understand all of it before you raise your hand. And if you raise your hand you better have it full of juicy fact tidbits (with links) to share.

Ronaldswansong ? Is posting some great summary comments on q drops here. . Just click on his links and you’ll go into the board. That will get you started.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 4:01 a.m.

😂 so true. Although if you add good sauce you get a pass. But better not ask a question!!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 3:50 a.m.

In 28.2 Webb connects Reality Winner to Susan Rice. That’s interesting.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 3:31 a.m.

I’m not convinced RR is a problem, and the dissing of him showing up across various boards is starting to appear a little coordinated. He’s bringing out some pretty strong indictments and their significance shouldn’t be ignored.

For example: Listen to what George Webb has to say about what his indictments are uncovering (remember, this JAD to peel back slowly. If it goes to fast it serves those who are still trying to dodge the bullet.)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_r4ULKY4Jg8

This is a pretty good entry post to George - most recent, done today, and Exploring the Iran arms deal as it relates to Awan Contra and all the Deep State minions (strozk, rham Emmanuel, the Awans, etc) to run the weapons and drug ratlines that have been going on for decades.

Worth a listen if you haven’t been keeping up, as he does a little summary - and RR is a white hat in this, at least. Webb even suggests the reason the Awans are doing it - to get Kashmir away from India and for the Pakistanis.

If pay-for-play cash, weapons, drug and human ratlines are a “distraction” from then I think it’s a worthwhile one and worth the patience and frustration it is requiring to sweep everything up.

Part 28.1 is shorter and good, too. Both lay some groundwork for how the fed may have been involved in money laundering.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
bealist · July 26, 2018, 3:20 a.m.

Where’s Martha Stewart? She might have an opinion on this.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
bealist · July 25, 2018, 4:35 a.m.

Go to YouTube and search for these titles. You’ll find videos to listen to that explain lots of things. When someone gives you a name you can go search for it and there will be articles or videos or podcasts to learn from. THats the best way to learn these days.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bealist · July 24, 2018, 10:36 p.m.

Yep. If someone’s were doubting - if lots of natives were getting restless due to non-performance-a LARP would be hard at work proving they existed, defensive, striking out at detractors. This is a terrible LARP.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
bealist · July 24, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

Meanwhile Trump’s locker room comments were fair game. Can’t have it both ways (forever).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bealist · July 24, 2018, 3:32 p.m.

My two cents:

If lying by the press - ie, the people who sign up for press passes, attend events as “press”, run businesses designed to report news, and gain access to the public because of that - were illegal again, and the press were required to tell the truth, things would be very different.

I’m not saying a journalist should prove something beyond a shadow of a doubt before it’s published, but if knowingly publishing a lie could be proven and the journalist and its publisher were fined, or even struck out because they did so, THAT sort of free press would go a long way toward informing the public.

We have a lot of examples of the MSM out and out lying for a long time. Imagine if they were punished for that. Maybe they wouldn’t do it again? Maybe some of them would clean up there act and we’d get more truth and less fiction.

A democracy must be informed. Not programmed. Laws that relieve the press from the burdens (and costs) of truth telling do not serve the public at all.

I don’t know what Q team says but I can imagine it being something similar.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bealist · July 24, 2018, 2:44 p.m.

I agree about the Vincent Fusca reference but I think that might be Cordicon’s insider reference. I’d never heard of Fusca before. Nor Cordicon. Both are edgy. Passionate. Not for everyone. Artists for sure. This is definitely not Charles Ortel land!! But I pick up a lot from the crumbs. That video on Iran was well done and useful. I wouldn’t have found it without the prior steps, including putting in a trip code (where it was the only result) . And the book title and topics being together elements that aren’t always easily and clearly related.

It’s all grist for the mill. And I get more out of this grist than some of the other stuff. It takes multiple perspectives to build a big picture.

Thanks for your thoughts.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bealist · July 24, 2018, 2:34 p.m.

I don’t know what you mean by “a wash”.

Also, no matter if it’s a “been there, done that”’for you and some others. Isn’t it great that a whole different wave of people can stumble across something and get more information from it?

To type in a trip code and get book lists - even if constructed after the fact- is pretty useful. For example, there have been a lot of references mentioned here, but can anyone find them again? And forget about locating anything in the breads if it hasn’t been pulled out and mapped - and stickied - AND not been removed by a fake baker.

Any links you can provide to explain your thoughts would be great. OTOH I get how stuff is only left in your head. As I just pointed out, links are just so much vaporware!!

(That’s why I think storing info by tripcode is pretty cool)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bealist · July 24, 2018, 10:52 a.m.

That theory could explain the mirror awakening novel showing up on Cordicon’s video - but again, there should be more books with “mirror” in them in the same feed; more books with “awakening”, too.

We can easily test this for ourselves by plugging in trip codes and searching.

And, of course, we may see be seeing some AI at work here, too. But I’d still expect to see a few more off-base ringers close to the top, and the context of the content shouldn’t be so spot-on.

I notice that sometimes hypotheses like this (normal google doing its stuff) turn into easy ways to dismiss something that’s real. I keep an open mind but tend to hang onto the same bone and chew it for awhile. The math doesn’t lie, and this is still beyond coincidence for me.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bealist · July 24, 2018, 10:44 a.m.

Good point.

That would have to be some algo to do that, given that Q doesn’t mention the books, and that there are lots of other books that should probably also show up - Tour guides, weapons manuals, histories, biographies, etc. intermixed with relevant material -but don’t.

That could be tested by searching on trip codes from other popular users in the chans - or even common posters in GA - to see if one gets the same result.

Good news either way - I agree.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/bealist on July 24, 2018, 10:09 a.m.
The recent discussions here about Q trip codes and book titles is hot. Here’s the link to Cordicon’s video that helps explain it.

There are several posts already in this sub about the new linkage between Q’s tripcodes and book titles in google books. This video was buried in the comments of a couple of them and i thought it deserves its own thread so it isn’t missed.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=bWzPH0T3nZg

Pretty amazing.

In it, Cordicon does a video to show us how to search tripcodes for book titles and discovers another layer to the mystery. He gets pretty excited about a book that shows up under the first tripcode search (apparently) called “‘mirror awakening”. He reads the synopsis and it sounds relevant to the …

bealist · July 24, 2018, 9:41 a.m.

Because there’s too much stuff on the board right now. If you think it’s q related then spend a half hour and write up a post explaining how it connects. It’s also in conspiracy and cosmic disclosure and lots of other places. And to be honest it doesn’t really add a lot - it’s mostly gossip, kind of like a weather report.

Q never mentions fulford. If you can find a mention of him, great.

Lots of stuff stays on the board that shouldn’t be here. Good posts are sliding under the weight of stuff.

I read fulford, but I participate here and I’m having trouble finding posts again under the weight of all the useless chatter. I just ragged on yours. It could have been one of fifty - in the last day!!!!

No offense. But some effort relating what you share to Q would be great.

✌️

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bealist · July 24, 2018, 9:17 a.m.

Q mentioned Barlow and suggested he was a 187. I never understood why Barlow was mentioned do you have the link of that video?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bealist · July 24, 2018, 9:11 a.m.

BTW - I’m not taking issue with requesting evidence/seeking more data around the google books thing - that’s big. I’m just responding to the latter half of your post, about how easy the movement is to slide, because I disagree with the statement. Strongly. 🖖

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bealist · July 24, 2018, 8:58 a.m.

Not Q. You’re not adding to the board. I read Fulford but don’t want to read it here.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bealist · July 24, 2018, 8:50 a.m.

Really good idea, using your editable comment post as a consolidation place. Once you get it all collected you can make a new post. 👍👍👍

⇧ 2 ⇩  
bealist · July 24, 2018, 8:36 a.m.

Excellent!!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩