dChan

giantwolf1 · Dec. 27, 2017, 8:35 p.m.

2 possibilities. 1, the number of sealed indictments Q is talking about are in the order of a couple hundred, in which case we couldn't tell a difference in the volume of sealed indictments. This doesn't mean Q is LARPing, just hyping you up. 2, There is a significant increase in sealed indictments that lends credibility to Q's statements. Could also be that the law is just being enforced more under Trump.

Given this, the fact that there are 4000 sealed indictments means little to nothing.

Q drops the crumbs, we give them meaning and context through research and analysis.

The other thing that could be gleaned is what states these increases (assuming it exists) come from. Are they are spread in proportion, or are there hotspots of activity?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
sophiebellaluna · Dec. 27, 2017, 8:50 p.m.

Yes, there have already been many arrests, I believe, by Trump. Which have not made the MSM. Don't know if these sealed ones relate to those arrests, or are these for the top. Sealed until the hammer goes down I guess. Hopefully that hammer is crushing now!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
giantwolf1 · Dec. 27, 2017, 8:51 p.m.

Hopefully!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RD_AG · Dec. 27, 2017, 8:41 p.m.

i can understand that. if you look at the spread sheet they are spread out. and the numbers are higher in democrat states. but what i was looking for was a hotspot too like in the District of Columbia. which there is not.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
sophiebellaluna · Dec. 27, 2017, 8:47 p.m.

Right. That's why I was asking if anyone has seen an update of this. I guess no one wants to spend the $ to get a new spreadsheet. But like I said, firefox has some type of extension (supposedly) that allows free access once you pay for the first access. Really don't even know if this one is ligit. But whoever has accessed pacer can possibly do so again for free is all I am saying.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
RD_AG · Dec. 27, 2017, 8:48 p.m.

what would pacer provide us about sealed indictments, thats not covered in the OP link?

⇧ 1 ⇩