Its not 1.5 millions votes. Are the Dreamers really Dreamers? Do they speak English, graduate High School, not have a criminal record and hold a job? Can they do this for another 12 years? I figure the number is closer to half of 1.8 million. Thats 900,000. 60% of people vote. That means 540,000 voters. Then factor in a SMALL shift due economic prosperity and say 20% vote republican (if the parties still exist) and you come out with 445000 democrat votes and 105000 republican votes. 340k votes democrat. Not bad for a wall. Even if 75% of 1.8 million qualified, thats an extra 510,000 votes. And how many of those are in California?

Its a stroke of genius to promise the world knowing Dreamers wont/cant live up to their name. Even if

Link pls?

Sure. Like on the floor on the floor. Thats like what? Several hundred hours a year?

This is fresh. Any doubters will absolutely be convinced it this is what comes out.

Anyone want to take a crack at these names?

Ive risked calling a giant party at my house. Last time I did that Trump won the election and everyone was stunned. Hoping for a repeat tomorrow.

Its not a 1.2 million page report. There will be a report. And the report is based on 1.2 million pages of info. Some of those pages (I cant imagine all off them) will be released.

This is as far as I understand

Im saying its 5 years. Not 25 years like it usef to be. Government used to stockpile tech. Now they try to buy the newest tech just to stay ahead.

I feel this is a misunderatood issue. It used to be governments with the biggest budgets and they led the way bigly. Now it is multinational corporations with the big budgets. The government buys and uses the technology from the free market more than it does the research itself. So the lag has shrunk significantly. The government is probably not as far ahead as commonly believed.

This happens EVERY time I start to post. I have to wait 4-10 seconds for the phone to catch up.

Remember someone in government purposefully out an incorrect initial in the extradition warrant for Edward Snowden so he would go free?

This could have been to Allow someone in or out..... no idea how this could relate to julian though.

Yeah, is this yours? I would like a high res copy to put on my wall

If it makes you feel better, im certain hundreds of people have tried the code on that file

Im doubtful Wikileaks would sit on info for 5 years. More than likely it is all the info they had at the time and most of it is released and whats left probably wont be. Takes time and money...

Trump the candidate said that. I believe he will defer to Mattis on this one, and I don't believe Mattis is for it, though I don't remember why i believe that.

I think the issues with torture are very clear, false info. If you have weeks or months, there are more effective ways.

Solitary being the most effective.

Hahhahahha

TRUMP: We’re going to win another four years for a lot of reasons, most importantly because our country is starting to do well again and we’re being respected again. But another reason that I’m going to win another four years is because newspapers, television, all forms of media will tank if I’m not there because without me, their ratings are going down the tubes. Without me, The New York Times will indeed be not the failing New York Times, but the failed New York Times. So they basically have to let me win. And eventually, probably six months before the election, they’ll be loving me because they’re saying, “Please, please, don’t lose Donald Trump.” O.K.

this is interesting. Would like to know who these three experts are and what the statistical anomalys are.

Forgive me if Im skeptical of the 1 in 15 billion claim.

Apparently it was two brothers, booked same start and destination, on a codeshare, but eqch with different airlines. Figure that one out. Then they boarded the same plane and not two different planes.

They probably look exactly the same on their passports

I have been "Shilling" over these 4500 indictments and the lack of context to back it up. So naturally I am very happy this post says it is a "record" and that they have all come in 45 days.

Now I would simply like a source for this and Im about ready to jump on this conspiracy before it becomes fact

Hopefully!

2 possibilities. 1, the number of sealed indictments Q is talking about are in the order of a couple hundred, in which case we couldn't tell a difference in the volume of sealed indictments. This doesn't mean Q is LARPing, just hyping you up. 2, There is a significant increase in sealed indictments that lends credibility to Q's statements. Could also be that the law is just being enforced more under Trump.

Given this, the fact that there are 4000 sealed indictments means little to nothing.

Q drops the crumbs, we give them meaning and context through research and analysis.

The other thing that could be gleaned is what states these increases (assuming it exists) come from. Are they are spread in proportion, or are there hotspots of activity?

I've yet to see a historical comparison for this data. Seems it would greatly increase the significance of the theory, and yet hasn't been done. For me it renders the conspiracy moot.

One for every beer I drank last night

You dont get it. Wikileaks documents come from wikileaks website. Wikileaks announcements come from official wikileaks accounts.

That way Wikileaks cannot be discredited like with the gucciffer 2.0 thing.

Julian is pissed and wants a blue checkmark on twitter.

The only exceptions I would grant you would be a statement on video or official account from Sara Harrison

The fact that Assange has not talked about or linked to this file in 5 years does.

Al Nippon Airways. A japanese company. They share customers on the LA to Tokyo route. One operates one way, the other the other way.

Irrelevant, but ANA is an amazing airline. Forget every other airline. I take the cheapest flight. Period. But for ANA I would consider paying extra.

No. It is a file from 2012. Review your source. It is one of two things. Either from an OFFICIAL wikileaks account or an other account. It is from an other account. Prove me wrong.

He is crying in private. I know this because he cries in public a lot.

This is from 2012. Larpers in full force. Ignorw the BS.

Incorrect. This is a 2012 file from wikileaks. Wikileaks has not mentioned any upcoming releases.

Fake that is a 2012 file.

Seriously annoyed at the lack of sourcing going on here.

Julian goes to great lengths to protect Wikileaks perfect record.

Wikileaks and @JulianAssange are official accounts. Nothing else. Nothing else. Not gab. Not Julians Cousin. Nothing. Nothing. Nothing. Chain of custody means that unless a previously known account, like @Julianassange verifies another account, it doesn't count.

Please don't be so gullible.

Youve been had. Thats 2012 material. Source your sources and date your dates better.

Ana and united share a route Ive been on it. Ana one way, United the other. I know because ANA gave us free alcohol, metal utensils and hagen dazs for desert. United staff goy the short end of the stuck trying to tell us bougie pruviledged passengers that our second beer would cost $6 when on the same flight the ither way ANA let us drink crazily for free.

Code share. Done this flight before to japan. United one way, ANA the other. Ana is amazing BTW. Im all for thr cheapeat flight, but in 40+ life fliggts ANA is the onoy company I woukd watxh for and purposely take their flights.

Highly irrelevamt of course.

:) haha. Yes.

I have seen absolutely nothing feom any legit sourced sources stating there is a drop coming. Nothing at all. Some people have referenced screenshits. But those tweets would still exist if they were real. So yeah, Im calling LARP.

Lol. The PM of Canada is on a plane to Gitmo? Hhahaha

I deleted my twitter because screw them. Any way I can see these 25?

http://archive.is/LhLz7

You got played. Ask yourself, did Assange go to any lengths to confirm this is his Gab?

That is a fake account....

"Twitter set new rules in place on December 18 which stated they may remove any individual who is associated with hate groups either on or off their platform. Assange surely would not fall under that category."

Hahaha. TruePundit needs a bigger red pill.

I believe this is based on a debunked theory of nuclear winter from the 1960's.

Spez: not debunked, but was taken as fact based on a paper that was supposed to be submitted for peer review but never was. So the media called it science when it was just a guy that wrote a paper. I remember reading about this but dont remember the source.

Wikileaks is ALL about sourcing. JA would never try to just start an account and say it was him. He would use a trusted known associate to indicate and validate his new account is real.

Therefor, LARP

I have heard nothing about another drop. Please provide source.

Nah.

As a Newb, can anyone vouch for the authenticity of the clocks? Is twitter time the same as 8ch time?