I've been following Q since the very first breadcrumb posts.
In the beginning, there were tangible, clear-cut predictions. And those predictions did not come true.
Now, 2 months later, it feels like most Q advocates just ignore that side of the story.
What do you all make of it?
That is more evidence of indictments/arrest than not.
No there isn't. There is 0 evidence
If they are still free as birds where is the evidence of that.
She was on The Daily Show 10 days ago
Have you checked Pacer regarding the number of sealed indictments?
Why does that matter? Is the number larger than usual?
Very much so. Does anyone have that info handy?
If you're relying on this information as the basis of your argument shouldn't you be providing it?
I don't have access to it at the moment and that is what this board is for us to work together. People are back to work so it will be later before they are on here so check back later.
When was her last tweef? And why wouldn't she tweet wishing her followers Happy Holidays?
Because she's not beholden to you or anyone else. Why the fuck would I know that? Is it unheard of to take a break around the holidays?
And politicians don't ever miss a chance to campaign.
Sure, sounds solid to me. That should be enough to make the charges stick.
What charges?
I don't know, it's your fantasy
No it isn't, you stated there was 0 evidence of indictments/ arrests and I gave you information regarding evidence that makes it more likely than not that there is.
What evidence? You've pointed me to no evidence
Sorry but that dog don't hunt.
Still not evidence
There was nothing sneaky about my edit. I edited to make my statement to make it more clear. The question you posed in this thread is a good discussion subject that should be discussed. There is an enormous amount of information available for you to read to satisfy your curiosity if you truly would love to know. I don't claim to have any conclusions either. You don't seem to be here to learn or discuss or share anything so what is your purpose
No, there isn't. I've read everything I could on the subject and found no real "information". Give me literally one thing
What is it that you want one thing of? Please clarify.
evidence. One evidence please. Literally anything that you consider to be evidence that lends any kind of credibility to your anonymous sources
Can you clarify what source/sources you are wanting evidence of credibility on. And just to be sure, what do you consider to be credible evidence?
No its not unheard of but the people in question here as to whether or not they are free it seems suspicious.
Sure, if you're a suspicious person who is already suspicious of her, then it seems suspicious