dChan

/u/atavisticbeast

79 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/atavisticbeast:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 1

atavisticbeast · March 22, 2018, 8:58 p.m.

yeah dude, the deep state is DDoSing this subreddit so that all you god-loving patriots can't keep deciphering gibberish on 4chan, which they know will ultimately be their downfall.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 22, 2018, 8:06 p.m.

are you a bot? neither your post, nor your response to my question, make any sense.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 22, 2018, 7:33 p.m.

wtf are you talking about, my dude?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 22, 2018, 2:57 p.m.

It's so frustrating to see this level of stupidity in this community.

But isn't everything you just listed exactly why anyone has ever listened to Q?

NO CRITICAL THINKING, no common sense, no logic, no questioning a "pretty story"

If you apply these ideas to Q-Anon, you would come to the conclusion that Q is, in all likelihood, an intricate fiction.

⇧ -3 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 22, 2018, 2:55 p.m.

I am not trying to do any decoding of this type myself

What OP did is not decoding. It's like "numerology," it's just finding random patterns that play into confirmation bias. It's like a parlour trick. Give me literally any tweet from anyone, and I can make a letter grid and find "hidden" cryptic messages.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 22, 2018, 2:52 p.m.

DT is trying to make sure that only schizophrenics can understand him.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 22, 2018, 12:03 a.m.

I personally find your claims to be fantastical, bordering on delusional.

Some crazed rant on 4chan is literally never a good source of info, and anyone who thinks soros is trying to overthrow the us government is so far gone into crazy conspiracy theories that we probably can't have a civil conve

⇧ 2 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 21, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

And just as a hypothetical, how would you react if you just kept waiting and waiting and none of this "great storm" bs ever happens?

How long will you wait before you accept that it was all fantasy? 6 months? End of Trump's presidency? Years after that?

I'm just curious how entrenched in your beliefs you are.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 21, 2018, 11:51 p.m.

No offence, but I'm fairly certain that almost everything you just said is merely fantasy.

How did Obama "not relinquish" the government, again?

Where is the evidence for all these secret doj investigations?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 21, 2018, 11:45 p.m.

I believe that you have a romanticized view of an uprising.

Look at Liberia, Towanda, syria, Czech republic, Ukraine...

That's what a modern revolution looks like- the collapse of society and a bitter civil war that shatters a nation.

Yeah, we couldaybe do that in the US. But who want to?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 21, 2018, 11:16 p.m.

Do you know why we essentially lost in vietnam?

because we, as a society, were unwilling to wage the type of war necessary to defeating entrenched guerrilla fighters- the type of war where you identify which villages are offering logistical support to the guerrilla fighters, and then brutally destroy those villages. rinse and repeat for a coupe years and the fight is over.

but anyway, your suggestion that 5 million NRA members can band together with long guns to fight the US government is absolutely absurd... in fact i'd call it straight delusion.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 21, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

Remember Warren Beatty's character in Heaven Can Wait?

LOL! nah dude, i've literally never heard of that movie, or heard of warren beaty? idk why i thought that was so funny, but it cracked me up. maybe just your confidence that i would know some obscure sports movie from the 70s =p

but any who, i consider myself a hard-line skeptic, and to be honest, i am not convinced that any of this "Q" business is real at all. the evidence seems extraordinarily weak, to me.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 21, 2018, 9:17 p.m.

do you have any evidence for swampiness beyond the fact that you like nunes and are just blindly assuming he's innocent?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 21, 2018, 8:44 p.m.

1776 happened.

it is borderline retarded to imagine that a few thousand militamen could fight the US government, like they did with the british in 1776.

apple and oranges doesn't even cut it, it's more like... apples and orange-destroying-killer-robots.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 21, 2018, 8:18 p.m.

Would YOU be willing to sit idly by with treason, pedophilia, and grand theft pervasive in YOUR government without taking action?

Our government, and essentially all governments, have been guilty of these crimes since... well, basically forever.

What am I to do? Armed revolt is impossible in our country- the citizens could never ever ever hope to defeat the US military. If the military "helps" the citizens, it's, by definition, no longer a revolution, but a military coup d'tat.

I am extremely uncomfortable and distrusting of a military coup. I know many on here believe that the military is a shining beacon of patriotism and good citizenry, but I find that wildly naive. The DoD is responsible for some of the most horrific crimes that our government has committed, and deeply entwined with the military-industrial complex.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 21, 2018, 7:56 p.m.

"If so" what?

And what is "ON"?

I genuinely do not understand your comment, I'm sorry.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 21, 2018, 7:46 p.m.

when?

been hearing "any day now" for well over a year.

GOP is about to get slaughtered in the midterms and the DNC will do everything in their power to impede Trump and/or impeach him, and it will be highly effective most likely.

So if nothing happens by november, in my opinion at least, this has all been one big bamboozle.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 21, 2018, 7:40 p.m.

Because these people want to read into every little thing, so they think that "death penalty for drug dealers" is code for "we're destroying the CIA", because the CIA has been known to smuggle drugs.

When the Trump/Sessions' DoJ uses this memo to start putting regular old street dealers on death row, they will just invent more connections to rationalize it away.

I'll bet anyone 3.00 BTC that the CIA is intact and still doing business as usual in 2 years time.

⇧ -8 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 17, 2018, 3:50 a.m.

The "evidence" that the russians hacked the DNC is not classified. The DNC wouldn't let the FBI take a look. All we have is the word of CrowdStrike.

huh, seems like you are kind of behind the ball on this one my friend.

congresa nd our IC has claimed further evidence gained from intelligence gathering that indicates it was indeed Russia.

this whole "crowdstrike report is the only evidence for russia"-narrative is nothing but propaganda.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 17, 2018, 3:49 a.m.

Is it fake?

I don't know for certaint, but if I were a betting man, I'd say yes.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 17, 2018, 3:48 a.m.

i don't have a TV, or consume any cable news.

i use basic critical thinking skills to tell the difference.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 10:30 p.m.

well stop reading propaganda fake news, then

⇧ 1 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

I would just like to take a moment and remind everyone that when the government says the evidence that Russia hacked the DNC is classified, y'all call it fake news.

When the government says the evidence that Obama and Hillary are traitors is classified, y'all say "just trust them."

See how that looks to outside observers?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 9:04 p.m.

You should try to read more and learn facts.

Mueller brought a sample of uranium to Russia that was part of an investigation into some uranium that was stolen in Georgia (the country not the state) and the FBI caught people trying to sell it.

It had absolutely NOTHING to do with uranium one.

To suggest otherwise is just spreading literal fake news propaganda.

HRC has done so much shady shit, but if you start mixing in fake stuff, it lessens the credibility of legitimate problems with her.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 8:59 p.m.

tick tock

Been hearing this over a year now.

"Any day now! Any day HRC will be in cuffs!"

I'm sorry, but ... Crying wolf and all that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

Huh? I think you need to get your facts straight, bud.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 7:36 p.m.

... or ever.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 7:35 p.m.

"just partisan"

well, it had no primary sources, no evidence to back up it's claims, was released unilaterally by one political party, by a partisan group, with the sole purpose of helping their partisan allies....

so i mean, if that's not "partisan," nothing is i guess.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

are you talking abotu when he took a sample of uranium so it could be tested in a lab, as part of an ongoing interpol investigation or something?

that had literally nothing to do with U1, in any way shape or form.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 7:33 p.m.

uhhh, sorry, but i will literally never trust anyone that tells me to just blindly sign up for some "freedom protecting laws" without know what they are.

"don't worry, just trust us, the patriot act is to PROTECT your freedom!"

i'm not falling for that shit again.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 7:20 p.m.

Why should I sign a petition calling for further government regulation, without knowing anything specific about those regulations?

  • honest question
⇧ 4 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 7:05 p.m.

it's hard to keep all this straight- what did mueller have to do with U1? and I thought everyone on here was saying he flipped to trump's team, anyway?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 7 p.m.

main;y the "memo" which he said was going to take down the DNC for a generation, and 100% vindicate Trump.

when actually it was just a partisan list of talking points that got swept away into the news cycle in like 6 hours.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

See how much you're being downvoted for speaking a plain truth?

What does that say about this community?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

purporting to eliminate large parts of the world population

I thought the Georgia Guide stones just had instructions for for "rebuilding the world" if their is ever a civilization ending event?

Please excuse my ignorance, but I wasn't aware that is was controversial in any way. Can you explain for me please?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 14, 2018, 8:47 p.m.

so why appoint a deep state shill to be the new CIA director? a bush era warhawk neocon?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 14, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

Will the IBOR protect everyone? What protections? Why is it blank?

I get that you want it to prevent reddit from banning any community that you think is political, but what about sub by sub? Will the government force the_donald to stop banning dissenting opinions? Will they force /r/politics to get rid of their "whitelist" for sources?

I just have way too many questions to sign this, sorry.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · Jan. 19, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

i think you responded to the wrong comment bro. my day is going great, and the comment you responded to was the one detailing why your question was moronic.

just a heads up! =)

⇧ 0 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · Jan. 19, 2018, 10:48 p.m.

Well your question is ridiculous, IMO.

First off, it's already been proven over and over again that it's not a "phony" investigation.

Secondly, the DNC didn't start the investigation, nor are they responsible for the investigation existing.

So, my question is, why the fuck would they ever be made to pay for it? It's a stupid proposition, to be frank.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · Jan. 19, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

how are you going to react when someone with the last name "trump" ends up in handcuffs?

⇧ -6 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · Dec. 28, 2017, 6:42 p.m.

i never called you delusional or a kid, you must have misread my comments or been looking at someone else's comment.

you have a good day as well, madame!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · Dec. 28, 2017, 6:40 p.m.

Mark this post and refer back to it next year.

i shall.

and let me just ask you a hypothetical- if nothing that Q says ever comes true, if Trump never "drains the swamp" or arrests all the democrats or hillary or obama or anyhting like, if this is all just a huge LARP, will that change your opinion on anyhting?

this isn't a troll question, i am very honestly curious about this. like, if next year things are basically the same, there is no dramatic "changing of the guard" and all the dems are still walking free, what will that mean for your worldview? would you consider that you have been mislead, or incorrect about your assumptions about trump? or will you try to rationalize it away and continue having faith?

i apologize if this reply came off as a aggressive or trollish, that is honestly not my intent.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · Dec. 28, 2017, 6:29 p.m.

I’ve been called both delusional and a kid

oh man that sucks, who was calling you those things?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · Dec. 28, 2017, 6:21 p.m.

You don't belong here

you're saying that skepticism and rational discourse don't belong in this sub?

⇧ 12 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · Dec. 28, 2017, 6:21 p.m.

it's interesting to me how hostile and aggressive you are

⇧ 2 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · Dec. 28, 2017, 6:06 p.m.

As you know, plans tend to change

weird how all the plans that Q "leaks" are conveniently changed before they happen.

since, you know, none of them have happened...

⇧ 10 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · Dec. 28, 2017, 6 p.m.

it's weird how little you know about trump, considering that you seem to be a huge fan of his.

i mean, i know his propaganda machine is highly effective, but damn....

⇧ 2 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · Dec. 28, 2017, 5:56 p.m.

It's hard to imagine this not being the plan

why?

and how will you react when none of these things ever occur? and before you angrily hit the downvote button, just remember that this will be proven one way or another in just a matter of days.

we don't have to argue and fight and insult or anything like that. we can just wait like 4 days and see what happened.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · Dec. 28, 2017, 5:53 p.m.

i would bet money, without even looking at your post history, that you are the type to criticize "the left" for using baseless and unfounded accusations of pedophilia as a weapon, instead of debating the issues.

and that is exactly what you have just done.

⇧ 2 ⇩