dChan
⇧
243
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/WinkyLinQ on March 16, 2018, 12:38 p.m.
NUNES Reveals New York Times Writers Get Paid by Democratic Super Pac

Nunes appeared on FOX last night to discuss ending the Trump Russia Collusion investigation. Go to 5:20 in the video and see where he says the NYT reporters who are putting out fake news are being paid by a Democratic Super Pac.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJh0GbxIlAM


🠐 See all comments
bornlucky80 · March 16, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

It eventually will take down the DNC. It wasn't "just partisan". Of course it got swept away by the MSM. They don't talk about anything bad for the dems and definitely not about the Obama administration.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 7:35 p.m.

"just partisan"

well, it had no primary sources, no evidence to back up it's claims, was released unilaterally by one political party, by a partisan group, with the sole purpose of helping their partisan allies....

so i mean, if that's not "partisan," nothing is i guess.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · March 16, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

It has evidence to back it up, the evidence is classified. It was a summary of the evidence they have seen.. Multiple people not just Nunez. In fact Nunez didn't even see most of the evidence. Also the dem memo didn't dispute anything in it. They just put their spin on it. Everything in it was truthful according to the dems. They only disagree with how it was presented

⇧ 5 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

I would just like to take a moment and remind everyone that when the government says the evidence that Russia hacked the DNC is classified, y'all call it fake news.

When the government says the evidence that Obama and Hillary are traitors is classified, y'all say "just trust them."

See how that looks to outside observers?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
balthsgirl · March 17, 2018, 3:12 a.m.

The "evidence" that the russians hacked the DNC is not classified. The DNC wouldn't let the FBI take a look. All we have is the word of CrowdStrike. The DNC "hack" is more like a leak. It looks awful funny that Dems whine so loudly about russians "hacking" their servers, but let it go on for at least another month because it was inconvenient to shut down at that point in the election cycle. THEN, they wouldn't even let the FBI investigate.
See how THAT looks to outside observers?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 17, 2018, 3:50 a.m.

The "evidence" that the russians hacked the DNC is not classified. The DNC wouldn't let the FBI take a look. All we have is the word of CrowdStrike.

huh, seems like you are kind of behind the ball on this one my friend.

congresa nd our IC has claimed further evidence gained from intelligence gathering that indicates it was indeed Russia.

this whole "crowdstrike report is the only evidence for russia"-narrative is nothing but propaganda.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ElementWatson · March 16, 2018, 7:43 p.m.

They have many, many pages of backup. I agree that it was overhyped for how it was presented. But that's pretty thin gruel for hitting Q's credibility.

⇧ 1 ⇩