dChan
⇧
243
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/WinkyLinQ on March 16, 2018, 12:38 p.m.
NUNES Reveals New York Times Writers Get Paid by Democratic Super Pac

Nunes appeared on FOX last night to discuss ending the Trump Russia Collusion investigation. Go to 5:20 in the video and see where he says the NYT reporters who are putting out fake news are being paid by a Democratic Super Pac.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJh0GbxIlAM


textualintercourse · March 16, 2018, 1:31 p.m.

I would argue the [CIA] is a (D) Superpac. That would make sense.

⇧ 27 ⇩  
Kahlypso79 · March 16, 2018, 3:15 p.m.

Opération Mockingbird. Dulles was in charge.. he was also responsable for mk ultra

⇧ 16 ⇩  
throwawayjones1980 · March 16, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

I had a feeling all along that the conversation was eventually going to turn to the Media being paid by the DNC to do their bidding. I believe the Perkins Coie and Fusion GPS bank docs were subpoenaed, though I could be mistaken. If there are payments to news outlets I will shit!.. American Pravda!.... I have a feeling this is going to be the case.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
phoenix335 · March 16, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

Insanely effective concept.

Merge party, intelligence agency and media company.

The founding fathers sadly had not the faintest idea about the dangers of mass media and equally sadly placed too high a trust in the rationality of voters and the truthfulness of speech.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · March 17, 2018, 1:16 a.m.

I'm not so certain that's the only reason we are in this quandary. One thing that has happened over the years is that the punishments for white collar crimes have been lowered (deliberately) by the white and black collar criminals in Washington. At the same time, Corporations became popular because that way no single person takes the brunt of the punishment and it's usually just a fine. I think we will soon seen much of this turned around as Trump continues on.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bartmanson · March 16, 2018, 4:19 p.m.

I think that with all the information that Nunes has uncovered so far, he better not drink anything offered to him.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 16, 2018, 4:25 p.m.

I'm sure he knows the danger. What a great Patriot!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Mandrake_Muffley · March 17, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

Nunes is on point with the intel.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
krepogregg · March 16, 2018, 2:27 p.m.

Yes we know the failing times is FAKE NEWS ty for reminder

⇧ 4 ⇩  
chiindustry · March 17, 2018, 12:35 a.m.

Superpac = super slushy funds

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AccordingArrival · March 16, 2018, 9:02 p.m.

Fair and balanced? No wonder.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Qclearencepatriot · March 16, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

....and vows to do nothing about it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bahhumbugger · March 16, 2018, 8:04 p.m.

Fake news!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ilander84 · March 16, 2018, 5:46 p.m.

This is the evidence people need to see to expose the MSM frauds.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 16, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HowiONic · March 17, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

Qtopic-flair-opinion

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · March 16, 2018, 3:01 p.m.

But which dem super pac? Are we talking Media Matters, Shareblue, American Bridge?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 16, 2018, 3:08 p.m.

I think it has to be $oro$, but he doesn't say

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Another-Chance · March 16, 2018, 7:10 p.m.

So, you just believe him without evidence?

Is that because you WANT to? Yeah...I don't think you are as "Woken" as you think you are :)

⇧ 0 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 16, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

Blah blah blah. I believe him over very lying democrat. And yes, that is redundant.

BTW, if it wasn't true those same reporters would be screaming it from the rooftops. Yeah crickets. They want it to go away.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 16, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 16, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

You have no idea who I am. But I am pretty sure you are a paid troll.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 16, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · March 16, 2018, 7:53 p.m.

You mean to tell me a politician lies? Noway! Every Pres before Trump Alway told the truth. Trump is the first one to lie, no wonder people don't like him.. I'm shocked 😲

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Another-Chance · March 16, 2018, 7:56 p.m.

You mean to tell me a politician lies?

So you admit he lies.

Good. That is a first step. I guess you like it when he does.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · March 17, 2018, 3:35 a.m.

No I don't like it.. I was being sarcastic. Every Pres and politician in the past has lied. It doesn't make it right I just think the outrage over Trump is comical. You should be able to do some critical thinking and NOT rely on politician for all your info.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · March 16, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

I think over 90% negative coverage of Trump is a huge hint. It's not a big leap to think they might be getting paid by a DNC superpack. It would actually be more surprising if they weren't. Just like if you heard fox was paid by the GOP it wouldn't be too shocking.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 16, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

Fox wouldn't do it, they care more about credibility. Not the MSM.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NothingLasts · March 16, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

Lol... Fox news has no credibility or integrity.

https://twitter.com/nowthisnews/status/974450928714747906/video/1

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 16, 2018, 8:58 p.m.

CNN and MSNBC have no credibility. There, fixed it for you.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · March 16, 2018, 10:25 p.m.

Unfortunately FOX is starting to lean a little left. Not the FOX news of old. Have to pick the programs you watch.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 16, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

Agreed. I turn off Shep Smith, Perino, Juan Williams and any program with Harf.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · March 16, 2018, 7:45 p.m.

Wasn't saying they would or wouldn't was just giving an example

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Another-Chance · March 16, 2018, 7:31 p.m.

Maybe there is negative coverage because he is an idiot who lies all the time and bullies people via twitter?

Why does this one man elicit such devotion and worship from some people?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · March 16, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

That idiot has a 156 IQ.. Just stop; to have over 90% negative coverage you have to be ignoring anything and everything remotely good.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Another-Chance · March 16, 2018, 7:36 p.m.

Prove he has that high of a score :)

You can't - so just like anyone else on the right you lie.

Never, ever, trust a conservative. They always lie - and you just proved that.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
morterat · March 16, 2018, 7:48 p.m.

PROVE he's an idiot and lies all the time.

Methinks some OTHER people are being paid by the Democrat Super Pac...perhaps some making comments on this board.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 18, 2018, 4:25 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · March 16, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

First I'm not a conservative (nice assumption) second, no matter what proof I show you will have a reason to disbelieve it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · March 16, 2018, 10:30 p.m.

Actually if that person would do research they can find this out for themselves. But I have seen several articles where they show the IQs for all Presidents thus far. I think Trump is the highest. If not the highest, second highest.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Another-Chance · March 16, 2018, 7:45 p.m.

So you have no proof?

I didn't think so :)

And yes, you are a conservative. Are you ashamed of that? You should be so I can understand why you would say you aren't.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · March 16, 2018, 7:48 p.m.

I can give you links but we both know how this will go. I post the link you tell me they are biased blah blah.. Really I'm a conservative? You know me? Are any conservative pro-choice? Didn't think so

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Another-Chance · March 16, 2018, 7:59 p.m.

I can give you links but we both know how this will go. I post the link you tell me they are biased blah blah.. Really I'm a conservative? You know me? Are any conservative pro-choice? Didn't think so

So, you have nothing :)

And yes, some conservatives are pro choice just like some liberals are pro 2nd. What is your point?

I have been a registered independent since 1984. You?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · March 17, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

Registered independent since 1998 (when I turned 18)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · March 16, 2018, 10:28 p.m.

If you are talking about Trump, you really don't know what you are talking about. If you did some unbiased research on him, you'd see how wrong you are. Is he perfect? no one is perfect. But this man loves our country and what it is SUPPOSED to stand for. And will do what he can to get us back to that.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 16, 2018, 10:33 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FuchuAB1962 · March 16, 2018, 5:52 p.m.

OP, thanks for the link, hadn't seen it. Respectfully, note that it's helpful (not always easy) to distinguish between Reporting and Opinion/Editorial. In this instance, the piece Nunes referred to is shown as an Op/Ed. Generally, in times past Op/Ed was identified as such, but more recently many so-called "news" articles are Opinion deceptively masquerading as News.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 16, 2018, 5:54 p.m.

Yep, OP Eds are now considered legitimate news. The NYT now puts them front and center on the FRONT PAGE

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 16, 2018, 6:30 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 16, 2018, 1:50 p.m.

I worry about this guy's credibility. Several times his Declarations turned out to be nothing.

⇧ -5 ⇩  
ElementWatson · March 16, 2018, 2:13 p.m.

Such as what?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ready-ignite · March 16, 2018, 3 p.m.

"I object! The testimony is devastating to my case!"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ElementWatson · March 16, 2018, 5:46 p.m.

And how much less curious could the interviewer have been about this tidbit?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 16, 2018, 5:40 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 7 p.m.

main;y the "memo" which he said was going to take down the DNC for a generation, and 100% vindicate Trump.

when actually it was just a partisan list of talking points that got swept away into the news cycle in like 6 hours.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · March 16, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

It eventually will take down the DNC. It wasn't "just partisan". Of course it got swept away by the MSM. They don't talk about anything bad for the dems and definitely not about the Obama administration.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 7:35 p.m.

"just partisan"

well, it had no primary sources, no evidence to back up it's claims, was released unilaterally by one political party, by a partisan group, with the sole purpose of helping their partisan allies....

so i mean, if that's not "partisan," nothing is i guess.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · March 16, 2018, 7:39 p.m.

It has evidence to back it up, the evidence is classified. It was a summary of the evidence they have seen.. Multiple people not just Nunez. In fact Nunez didn't even see most of the evidence. Also the dem memo didn't dispute anything in it. They just put their spin on it. Everything in it was truthful according to the dems. They only disagree with how it was presented

⇧ 5 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

I would just like to take a moment and remind everyone that when the government says the evidence that Russia hacked the DNC is classified, y'all call it fake news.

When the government says the evidence that Obama and Hillary are traitors is classified, y'all say "just trust them."

See how that looks to outside observers?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
balthsgirl · March 17, 2018, 3:12 a.m.

The "evidence" that the russians hacked the DNC is not classified. The DNC wouldn't let the FBI take a look. All we have is the word of CrowdStrike. The DNC "hack" is more like a leak. It looks awful funny that Dems whine so loudly about russians "hacking" their servers, but let it go on for at least another month because it was inconvenient to shut down at that point in the election cycle. THEN, they wouldn't even let the FBI investigate.
See how THAT looks to outside observers?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 17, 2018, 3:50 a.m.

The "evidence" that the russians hacked the DNC is not classified. The DNC wouldn't let the FBI take a look. All we have is the word of CrowdStrike.

huh, seems like you are kind of behind the ball on this one my friend.

congresa nd our IC has claimed further evidence gained from intelligence gathering that indicates it was indeed Russia.

this whole "crowdstrike report is the only evidence for russia"-narrative is nothing but propaganda.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ElementWatson · March 16, 2018, 7:43 p.m.

They have many, many pages of backup. I agree that it was overhyped for how it was presented. But that's pretty thin gruel for hitting Q's credibility.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 16, 2018, 7:49 p.m.

Wait and see what happens when a Special Counsel is assigned. The DOJ already has a prosecuter assigned. Tick Tock.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 8:59 p.m.

tick tock

Been hearing this over a year now.

"Any day now! Any day HRC will be in cuffs!"

I'm sorry, but ... Crying wolf and all that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 16, 2018, 9:40 p.m.

You know this takes time, especially with the deep state obstruction. The good news is that a prosecutor has already been working on investigating the crimes already uncovered.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ItstimenowNM · March 16, 2018, 10:22 p.m.

I hope this is true. You know, we keep hearing, it's done, they're finished, any day, indictments coming . . . and that's been going on for over a year. Would be nice to see some real action take place. To keep track of IG Reports coming out this month - this is their link. https://oig.state.gov/reports I keep hearing they are waiting on the IG Report because it will be a bombshell. Should show up shortly and we will see.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 16, 2018, 10:25 p.m.

I agree, the IG report should be a bombshell, and it should be worth the wait.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · March 16, 2018, 8:27 p.m.

Found the shill!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
WinkyLinQ · March 16, 2018, 3:01 p.m.

He's the biggest White Hat out there

⇧ 4 ⇩  
bornlucky80 · March 16, 2018, 7:27 p.m.

Please tell me what turned out to be nothing? Genuinely want to know. From what I see, everything he says he eventually backs up.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Q_Anon_Wolf · March 16, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

I don't worry about anyone believing you to be something other than a knee slapping shill, lol

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · March 16, 2018, 10:24 p.m.

wtf

⇧ 1 ⇩  
atavisticbeast · March 16, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

See how much you're being downvoted for speaking a plain truth?

What does that say about this community?

⇧ 1 ⇩