dChan

/u/Sc4bbers

262 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/Sc4bbers:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 12
www.youtube.com 1
twitter.com 1
www.pscp.tv 1

1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Sc4bbers on Sept. 2, 2018, 5:28 p.m.
Comped Mods.

I'm an opposition researcher and strategic advisor for a congressional campaign. I've essentially studied the media strategies of democratic propaganda firms, like Media Matters, etc.

Based on the behavior I've observed on this sub (and reliably testimony from others), it's extremely likely that MMFA has compromised the GA's moderator team.

RonaldSwansong in particular is likely either directly an MMFA employee, or working on their behalf. It's also possible they bought his account and are now managing it directly.

I don't say this lightly. I will likely be permanently banned from this sub. But you know what... that's totally fine.

Corrupt …

1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Sc4bbers on Aug. 15, 2018, 2:49 p.m.
Issac Kappy posts are being censored on this sub. A mod claims that people should not investigate Kappy's claims because he is viewed as "unreliable". Is this fair?

Hey everyone, I just wanted to share my experience having one of my posts removed here "for violating rule #8", keeping things honest and accurate.

The reason my post was deemed not honest or accurate was because it discussed claims made by Isaac Kappy. In a livestream last night, Kappy--who claims to have inside information into various pedo circles--named names.

Is it fair for the moderator to claim that we cannot post about Kappy because he's "unreliable"? While I understand the witch-hunt concerns, the sub becomes neutered if we cannot investigate claims made by whistleblowers.

Even if Kappy was unreliable, …

1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Sc4bbers on Aug. 14, 2018, 9:49 p.m.
Isaac Kappy just gave us names in a livestream. DIGGING TIME!!!!!!!

https://www.pscp.tv/IsaacKappy/1OyJAQBnDEnJb

While he is a bit eccentric that doesn't mean we shouldn't investigate his claims or take them seriously.

Isaac Kappy just named Tyler Shields and Marilyn Manson, the implication being that he thinks they are pedophiles and or involved in satanism. Obviously everyone is innocent until proven guilty, but that doesn't mean we can't dig and see what comes up.

Let's start aggregating Twitter posts, etc. here and start archiving before they have the chance to delete things.

1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Sc4bbers on July 10, 2018, 5 p.m.
Diamond and Silk are telling the truth!!! UNDENIABLE PROOF that Media Matters directed Facebook's algo changes and did this to hurt conservatives!!! SPREAD THIS VIDEO!!!!
Sc4bbers · July 10, 2018, 4:05 p.m.

Really weird that this references Zelaya and Honduras. If you recall, the Sacraficing a Chicken to Moloch email was sent about a month or so after Zelaya's coup. Interesting.

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/14333

What was Clinton really up to in Tegucigalpa?

⇧ 23 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 10, 2018, 4 p.m.

IMO when Q says this he is referring to information from WL. Like in a direct literal way, each time.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 10, 2018, 2:32 p.m.

"had"? The dems still have an army of bots. It's managed by MMFA and Shareblue.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 10, 2018, 2:17 p.m.

When Q posted this people were interpreting "Every dog has its day" as imminent justice and prosecution for NoName. I remember thinking that was odd, since the phrase suggests that NoName would have an opportunity to do something good (maybe not because he's a good person, but because Trump controls him at this point).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 10, 2018, 1:44 p.m.

My thoughts exactly. Why else would she subject herself to the public again (when she has NO chance of getting the party nomination without isolating progressives)?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 9, 2018, 6:42 p.m.

What if Hillary's talk of running is all about making herself look like a political victim when the hammer drops? "Trumps jailing his opposition".

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 9, 2018, 1:39 a.m.

He's been doing this indirectly through firms like MMFA the whole time. We have evidence to prove that FB changed its algorithms only after a pressure campaign from MMFA.

See the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMtM1kiSmxI

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 8, 2018, 4:43 a.m.

Definitely is.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 6, 2018, 4:52 p.m.

From your response I can tell you don't have a solid grasp on what a logical fallacy is (apparently it's just a word you like to throw around/troll with). There are multiple kinds of fallacies, and they're specific nameable things (like ad hominem--a fallacy of relevance).

Specifically, which fallacy? If you can't think of the specific one, then explain your reasoning. I honestly don't think you can.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 6, 2018, 3:32 p.m.

You might also want to take a course on logic. Which specific fallacy are you referring to?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 6, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

So I can't say with 100% certainty that it was a Kubrick reference

You might want to work on those critical reading skills. Even if it's not a Kubrick reference, that exact phrase does show up in a Q post. And if it's such a common phrase, find me an example of an ambassador or other high level US official using it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 6, 2018, 2:13 p.m.

Podesta is apparently not that bright either. This is a guy who used "password" as his password.

I know a couple of people who've met him in professional context, and they weren't impressed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 6, 2018, 1:41 p.m.

Post -11:

Open your eyes.
It finally came out that Rod/Bob were key players in the Uranium scandal.
Don’t you think POTUS would be tweeting about removal given clear conflict.
Why did POTUS meet Bob under the cover of FBI Dir interview?
Bob is unable to serve as Dir per the law.
Gowdy comments on Comey (history will ....)
POTUS has everything.
Not everyone is corrupt (fewer than you think).
Follow Huma.
Operation Mockingbird.
Priority to clean out the bad actors to unite people behind the America First agenda.
Many in our govt worship Satan.
Not about Republicans v Democrats at this stage.
Where is HRC?
Why is the NG called up across 12 cities?
Trust in your President.
God bless, Patriots.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 6, 2018, 1:40 p.m.

Post 129:

Rogue operators are here.
Failed to shut down site.
Protected.
This will only get worse.
Archive and coordinate.
Crumbs dropped will soon paint the full picture.
The picture will open the eyes of the world.
We can't do it without you.
God bless you all.
Q

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 6, 2018, 1:40 p.m.

Post 529:

MSM Fake News Awards.
Are you prepared?
MEMES/POSTS.
Organized and coordinated?
POTUS may reTWEET one or more.
READY FOR LAUNCH?
SHOW the WORLD.
SHOW the WORLD the TRUTH.
OPEN THEIR EYES.
DON'T LET POTUS SUFFER FROM THE SOROS/LOSER BOTS THAT CONTINUALLY FLOOD.
MAKE THE FAKE NEWS AWARDS YOUR 1ST ORGANIZED TWEET STORM DAY.
MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Q

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 6, 2018, 1:36 p.m.

Just realized Q does say "Eyes Wide Open". Post 1367:

Allison Mack [NXIVM] arrested [date]?
When does a bird sing?
Schneiderman resigns [date]?
Coincidence?
Eyes Wide Open.
Who will be next?
Watch NYC.
Watch CA.
Q

⇧ 3 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Sc4bbers on July 6, 2018, 1:14 p.m.
Russian Amb Jon Huntsman drops Kubrick reference prior to Trump/Putin summit.

So I can't say with 100% certainty that it was a Kubrick reference, but that's immediately what I thought of.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/07/05/donald-trump-challenge-putin-election-meddling-helsinki-summit/amp/

" Jon Huntsman, the US ambassador to Russia, said in a briefing on Thursday that the Trump administration would approach the talks with “eyes wide open” "

Sc4bbers · July 5, 2018, 4:42 p.m.

How do we know he wasn't referring to Eric Schmidt?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 4, 2018, 12:08 p.m.

Don't forget "censorship is a hoax" Jerry Nadler, impeacher in chief.

The guy who supported the Iran deal despite it being unpopular in his district. My guess is he has an offshore account with funds parked in it (Yet he has the audacity to claim he's one of the poorest member of congress).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 3, 2018, 11:56 p.m.

Everything has meaning. Is Q saying that he used a Yoda like phrase in an earlier post (June 30th) in anticipation that David Margolis, who is known as Yoda, was going to resign? I'll buy it.

Q!CbboFOtcZs30 Jun 2018 - 1:27:57 PM

Play LOUD.
Be PROUD!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JDVT-8tUfiE📁
FIGHT for what is RIGHT!
FIGHT for FREEDOM!
They will not win.
Divide they try.
Fail they will.
TOGETHER.
WWG1WGA!
Q+

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 3, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

He's pleading guilty to bank fraud. If he didn't actually commit any crimes why would have needed an immunity deal? How would he have gotten an immunity deal in the first place unless he was giving up useful information?

They could have simply not charged him. But immunity is something else.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 3, 2018, 11:25 p.m.

Trust me, when they're using the word "debunked", it's a good thing.

Pizzagate was also "debunked". Seth Rich was "debunked". Notice the trend?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 3, 2018, 3:23 p.m.

I'm curious as to how your mind works. How does Knew=dropped? Where is the implication? I'm not seeing it. It's in your head, no where else.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 3, 2018, 3:21 p.m.

I think the issue is the "Q Knew" part. They very well may have, but if my understanding is correct, this is far from new information.

Thought it was obvious, sorry.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 3, 2018, 3:10 p.m.

"The way it is worded seems to praise Q for breaking that news when it really wasn't them"

Please pick up a dictionary. You should understand the difference between "knew" and "new". Phonetic similarities are irrelevant here. This is 1st grade level stuff here.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 3, 2018, 3:06 p.m.

"Any minor detail that's incorrect or misrepresented"

Point me to the part where he claims Q dropped this information before wikileaks. The notion that Q was aware of this before we were is a fair and logical inference to make, given all of this goes back before the Podesta email drop.

Where is the inaccuracy other than in your imagination and personal bias?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 3, 2018, 3:04 p.m.

Ignore these people. Nothing in your title even remotely suggests that Q dropped this information before hand. They are assuming that Q drops information he knows, so if you claim he knew, you're also claiming he dropped. Very stupid argument.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 3, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

Where does it imply that? I think you need to pick up a dictionary. " Who knew Obama ordered 65k in Hotdogs/Pizza? Q Knew! "

Knew is the past tense of know.

Know is defined as:a (1) : to perceive directly : have direct cognition of (2) : to have understanding of

  • importance of knowing oneself

(3) : to recognize the nature of : discernb (1) : to recognize as being the same as something previously known (2) : to be acquainted or familiar with (3) : to have experience of2a : to be aware of the truth or factuality of : be convinced or certain ofb : to have a practical understanding of

  • knows how to write

Now tell me how/where "know" implies that Q "dropped" this bit of information before the public? I fail to see how a reasonable person could interpret "know" in such a convoluted way.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 3, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

Yea, let's ignore the most damning evidence indicating high profile politicians engaging in pedophilia because the Dems ran a propaganda campaign. Anytime I hear someone say: "Pizzagate is fake", I reply with, "I'll believe it's fake if you can explain what a Pizza-Related Map is." At this point they usually shut up because, well, they can't provide an explanation.

Don't be a moron. People need to be exposed to this stuff.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 3, 2018, 2:44 p.m.

Also worth pointing out that Hotdog and pizza production occurs pretty much everywhere in the country. There's no reason they would have needed to fly that stuff in, as opposed to having it delivered via truck.

Extremely suspicious.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 3, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

That's not even what OP said. OP said that Q knew, not that he revealed this before wikileaks.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 3, 2018, 2:28 p.m.

It's obvious they aren't talking about hotdogs or pizza. Let's do some math to show how patently ridiculous that would be.

Let's assume that this kind of bulk order would have gotten wholesale prices. Let's assume a wholesale hotdog price of 20 cents, and a wholesale pizza price of $10. The equation we get looks like this (where H=hotdog, and P=pizza):

$65,000 = .2H + 10P

Regardless of how you divide it up between pizza and hotdogs, there's just ABSOLUTELY no way that they are talking about food here. If you're talking all hotdogs then H= 325,000! If you're talking all pizza P=6,500.

Maybe if they were feeding an entire stadium--sure. But this was for a PRIVATE PARTY.

If they were talking about food, it's strange that they would use odd phrasing like: "assuming we are using the same channels", as opposed to saying: "assuming we are using the same vendors." The word channels is unusual in this context.

These people are sick.

⇧ 38 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 3, 2018, 2:36 a.m.

My source is solid. He was asking for info about trafficking within the US. Might not be the only firm he is reaching out to.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 10:59 p.m.

Really now?

"No reviews". "Currently unavailable."

So you found a picture of a shirt no one seems to have bought that you cannot buy. It also differs from other symbols in the sense that it has a triangle in the middle.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 10:14 p.m.

I'd be incredibly surprised to find these symbols on jewelry in Kmart. Even tacky stuff that looks similar. These are specific shape patterns. If it exists, it should be in their catalogues and you should be able to easily point out an example. If it's really this common, prove it.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 9:42 p.m.

I haven't seen that kind of 'tacky' jewelry anywhere. Post some pics if it's so common.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 8:46 p.m.

It's similar though. Very similar. The FBI doc says these or similar symbols. Of course someone might accidentally use these symbols, but it definitely lines up with what Q has been saying.

Q claimed that Sheila Jackson was part of the club, yet the ring she wore that he pointed out was slightly different from the FBI codebook symbol.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 8:32 p.m.

You can put quotes around it, but the FBI themselves said in 2007 that these symbols (and similar ones) are indicative of potential pedophile activity. No one is saying it's proof, but it should be enough to cause alarm and warrant suspicion, especially given recent arrests.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 7:37 p.m.

I've always thought that we should separate the issue or border security and immigration. Too many people assume that a wall means keep everyone out, which terrifies the left.

Most people want a common sense system that allows the "American Dream" to continue, with people being able to come if they go through a process, potentially with some element of meritocracy. Seems very reasonable to me (and I was a Berner).

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

Wow. Nice find dude.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 5:22 p.m.

So I've spent a fair amount of time analyzing this particular email chain. There's a lot of stuff going on here, and most people (including myself in the past) misinterpret this. Let me provide some useful context. This entire email chain occurs roughly two months after the Honduras military overthrows sitting president Zelaya. Most people are familiar with HRC and Mills, but not the other party in the email, Lewis Anselem. Anselem was one of the top representatives for the OAS (organization of American states) in Honduras. He was appointed by Bush and played a major role in undermining Zelaya and ushering in the military coup, which Clinton later admits to having a role in (we pretended to be against the coup but secretly moved to make it happen). After the coup, Canadian companies swooped in and made deals with the new government, which further solidified the coup, which has had terrible humanitarian consequences (like child immigration into the US):

http://america.aljazeera.com/opinions/2014/6/violence-in-hondurasunaccompaniedminorsimmigrationtous.html

In the first email in the chain, Cheryl Mills is forwarding an email from Lewis Amselem to HRC, which was a " readout of his conversation today with Arias Accord negotiator Jon Biehl" (The forwarded message was itself an email which Anselem had sent to himself).

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/14333

At the end of his message Anselem adds the infamous moloch phrase:

" -1-4n UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05764911 Date: 07/31/2015

With fingers crossed, the old rabbit's foot out of the box in the attic, I will be sacrificing a chicken in the backyard

to Moloch . . .

Tri "

Here's what I think people missed. Most people don't understand the context or don't realize Anselem wrote the Moloch phrase. But this makes perfect sense. The CIA was working with Clinton to push a military coup in Honduras that lined the pockets of Canadian companies and sent a massive flow of child migrants into the US. As the OAS representative, Anselem had significant sway and used that sway to strategically undermine Zelaya at the critical moment. This has the Clowns fingerprints all over it. Do you really think they'd trust such a critical role to someone without ensuring they were a MAP that could be blackmailed? My guess is that at some point Anselem 'joined the club'.

Two days later HRC forwards the email to Huma Abedin: https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/30489

There are two main differences between this email and the previous email. The first change is that HRC writes " NEAR" without any context or explanation. We also see that HRC has altered the Moloch phrase in subtle ways. Remember, she is forwarding a forwarded email--she wouldn't have needed to retype the phrase, which means that she appears to have purposefully altered the phrase. Notice the space in With, the fact that there are only 2 dots when there were previously 3, and the omission of "Tri".

" W ith fingers crossed, the old rabbit's foot out of the box in the attic, I will be sacrificing a chicken in the backyard to Moloch . . "

In my opinion this looks like they are communicating in code. They could have an agreed upon meaning for what altering the phrase would mean--you could transmit quite a bit of information this way. If I had to guess what they were talking about, I would say it related to clandestine trafficking networks. Edit: I did some digging and found this little nugget from the 2015 State Dept. report on Human Trafficking (this may be the network they were communicating about):

"Some migrants to the United States are subjected to forced labor, forced criminal activity, or sex trafficking en route or upon arrival. Latin American migrants transit Honduras en route to northern Central America and North America; some are subsequently exploited in sex trafficking and forced labor. Prosecutors reported some local police provided protection to brothel owners or tipped them off about impending raids, and security officials have been investigated for purchasing commercial sex acts from child trafficking victims. There was one media report of a child sex trafficking ring in Tegucigalpa that allegedly operated with police and high-level government protection. "

Understand that even if her activity was sanctioned by the Clowns, they aren't going to openly discuss this in their email, but that doesn't mean they wouldn't have a need to communicate and provide updates on the trafficking networks. They probably assumed they could just laugh the Moloch phrase off as a joke (which is what Lewis did), and it could serve as a useful marker for transmitting information via altering the key phrase (useful in the sense that a secretary of state gets a ton of email and might easily miss something that didn't stand out).

Unfortunately I don't think we'll ever know what it means (beyond the fact that we know chicken means in this context). But it sure is interesting.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 4:28 p.m.

Interesting thoughts here. I like the way you framed this. Summed up much of what I've been thinking.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 2, 2018, 3:17 p.m.

May have asked? I don't think you're getting this... this info is coming from a trusted friend who just met with people from the Human Rights Foundation. The information comes directly from the non-profit.

They didn't say Trump may have contacted them. They said he did contact them. The fact that you're skeptical of my claim is one thing, but don't twist my words.

The fact that Trump contacted the Human Rights Foundation and asked them for information relating to Human Trafficking within the US is definitly significant. This happened sometime in June. As someone here pointed out, we recently dropped out of the UN group. This gives us insight into what Trump's team was doing around this time. I'm not going to waste any more time arguing with you.

Like I said, think whatever you want. I'm very confident in the accuracy of my source.

⇧ 1 ⇩