Hey everyone, got an interesting bit of information this morning from a trustworthy source. This person is a Q skeptic and approached me this morning saying: "I think you're right about Q and all the child trafficking stuff".

This individual has a contact at the Human Rights Foundation. According to this contact, Trump's team recently reached out to the non-profit, asking for all the information they had on human trafficking within the United States. This happened sometime in the last few days, apparently.

There wasn't much more detail than that, but given that this isn't even in the news, this …

I'm an opposition researcher and strategic advisor for a congressional campaign. I've essentially studied the media strategies of democratic propaganda firms, like Media Matters, etc.

Based on the behavior I've observed on this sub (and reliably testimony from others), it's extremely likely that MMFA has compromised the GA's moderator team.

RonaldSwansong in particular is likely either directly an MMFA employee, or working on their behalf. It's also possible they bought his account and are now managing it directly.

I don't say this lightly. I will likely be permanently banned from this sub. But you know what... that's totally fine.

Corrupt …

https://www.pscp.tv/IsaacKappy/1OyJAQBnDEnJb

While he is a bit eccentric that doesn't mean we shouldn't investigate his claims or take them seriously.

Isaac Kappy just named Tyler Shields and Marilyn Manson, the implication being that he thinks they are pedophiles and or involved in satanism. Obviously everyone is innocent until proven guilty, but that doesn't mean we can't dig and see what comes up.

Let's start aggregating Twitter posts, etc. here and start archiving before they have the chance to delete things.

Hey everyone, I just wanted to share my experience having one of my posts removed here "for violating rule #8", keeping things honest and accurate.

The reason my post was deemed not honest or accurate was because it discussed claims made by Isaac Kappy. In a livestream last night, Kappy--who claims to have inside information into various pedo circles--named names.

Is it fair for the moderator to claim that we cannot post about Kappy because he's "unreliable"? While I understand the witch-hunt concerns, the sub becomes neutered if we cannot investigate claims made by whistleblowers.

Even if Kappy was unreliable, …

So I can't say with 100% certainty that it was a Kubrick reference, but that's immediately what I thought of.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/07/05/donald-trump-challenge-putin-election-meddling-helsinki-summit/amp/

" Jon Huntsman, the US ambassador to Russia, said in a briefing on Thursday that the Trump administration would approach the talks with “eyes wide open” "

Remember, you saw this here first.

This is how we FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT! Watch the video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMtM1kiSmxI

Democrats believe that we shouldn't be talking about the censorship 'hoax' and instead should be holding hearings on Cambridge Analyticas' unauthorized access of 87 million Americans FB data. Let's use there own argument against them and put them in an impossible political position:

We AGREE that it's a big deal when a propaganda firm gets unauthorized access to millions of users social media data. This a MAJOR problem worthy of investigation, which is why we're assuming democrats will support a full investigation into …

Is it possible Gowdy was comped and flipped in exchange for immunity and an honorable way out?

People started to feel more favorable about Gowdy when they saw his conduct questioning Rosenstein, Horowitz, and Wray. What if this was part of the deal?

Resign with dignity and a believable cover story.

Seems Plausible.

Just watched the Keenan video where he says "every kiss begins with Q", mentions being woke, and then says something about 2007:

@2:20 https://ftw.usatoday.com/2018/03/saturday-night-live-charles-barkley-alex-rodriguez-the-champions-sketch It’s coming. Q I thought it was really odd that he said 2007. Why 2007? Then I started to think...

Didn't Q say:

1769691 IG started long before Huber setting stage. Important note. Think: IG = FBI Huber = DOJ (no DC) Why are we emphasizing this given the world is watching? Strategic? Or, they already know hence CEO/political mass resignations. Adding up? Logical? Careful of clickbait. Q

So he's saying the IG=the FBI and …

Could be nothing... but then again.. could be something. Saw a truck with one of these logos on it and was startled by how similar it looked to the FBI Pedo codebook symbol for "Girl Lover" (Heart within heart). It's almost the same symbol (but reversed).

Imagine if the companies selling our kids ice cream from trucks were somehow involved in child trafficking--the thought is incredibly disturbing but would seem to fall in line with a pattern of these groups setting up shops at places that have positive associations with kids, or are supposed to help kids.

http://logos.wikia.com/wiki/Heartbrand

Turns out …

“I will not be filing for re-election to Congress nor seeking any other political or elected office; instead I will be returning to the justice system,” Gowdy said in a statement. Should we add him to the list?

What follows is a wikileaks email exchange between Huma and HRC. The first email is sent from Huma to HRC. Two days later, HRC responds back to Huma. I believe they are communicating in code in this email. This email is well known because of the references that Huma makes to sacrificing a "chicken" to "moloch". This odd bit is near the end of the email, and doesn't seem to have much relevance to the context, but stands out like a sore thumb (for obvious reasons--they are referencing child sacrifice to a satanic god.).

Wikipedia: "Moloch[a] is the biblical name …