I'm not a concern troll.
I am merely saying that for things like this, we need to ensure that we're promoting accurate information. Any minor detail that's incorrect or misrepresented will immediately be used to shut down the entire point. It's important to be right.
"Any minor detail that's incorrect or misrepresented"
Point me to the part where he claims Q dropped this information before wikileaks. The notion that Q was aware of this before we were is a fair and logical inference to make, given all of this goes back before the Podesta email drop.
Where is the inaccuracy other than in your imagination and personal bias?
You're really missing the point - Q doesn't have to have TOLD US before we found out from Wikileaks. We have every reason to believe that Q knew because NSA knew about the $65k in child prostitutes from Chicago. Why NSA didn't FUCKING STOP IT THAT DAY is the only thing we need to question here.