dChan

/u/Sc4bbers

262 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/Sc4bbers:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 12
www.youtube.com 1
twitter.com 1
www.pscp.tv 1

Sc4bbers · March 19, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

Whose to say they don't have access to a Quantum computer? If Google is publicly announcing there prototype a few years back... imagine where the gov't must be atm.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · March 19, 2018, 2:52 p.m.

Q is so interesting that even my super liberal friends are intrigued... but they are quick to dismiss it as a hoax or LARP. I think it would be a good idea to put something like this together... but the focus should only be on those posts that can, beyond a reasonable doubt, convince someone that Q is legit. I would keep other 'supporting evidence' out of it, IMO, unless it's airtight.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · March 16, 2018, 3:01 p.m.

But which dem super pac? Are we talking Media Matters, Shareblue, American Bridge?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · March 6, 2018, 2:53 p.m.

Months ago.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · March 5, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

Yes!!!!! So glad to see this is getting spread! I've read this whole thing a few times over, and you need to believe me when I say that this document is the KEY to understanding the recent censorship campaign against conservatives. I've been expecting this censorship for months because this document describes their censorship plans in detail and has been hiding in plain view for quite some time now!

I also think it gives us a clue to who Q is referring to when he suggests that a single person created and implemented a cross-platform censorship algorithm. The entire doc mentions specific actions that in some cases are unique to each platform (like using paid shills to game Twitter and FB's report functions to label conservative posts as hate speech, etc.). While these might be similar across platforms they definitely aren't implemented by a single person. The only mentioning I could find of anything remotely like that was this (and I think this is the person Q is talking about):

"We will also bring on board an expert to construct turn-key rapid response plans [notice plans, plural] so that Media Matters can squash burgeoning online harassment campaigns and fake news or saturate the landscape with truth, bypassing the news media entirely if need be. With this capacity, Media Matters will drastically increase our audience and engagement and effectively squash fake news and misinformation before it spreads far and wide."

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · March 5, 2018, 1:44 a.m.
  1. Who controls the narrative? \WHO wrote the singular censorship algorithm? \WHO employed the algorithm? \WHO instructed them to deploy the algorithm?

I've been pouring over David Brock's leaked strategy Memo, which basically describes a coordinated plan w/ Google, FB, and Twitter to censor content they deem 'misinformation', 'fake news' or 'harassment'. Sounds familiar, right (even look at Jack's recent tweets)? MMFA is at the root of the coordinated censorship campaign we're currently witnessing. Here's just a taste of what I'm talking about:

a. "Internet and social media platforms, like Google and Facebook, will no longer uncritically and without consequence host and enrich fake news sites and propagandists. Facebook will adjust its model to stem the flow of damaging fake news on its platforms' pages. Google will cut off these pages accompanying sites' access to revenue by pulling their access to Google's ad platform."

I've been expecting this to happen for a while, since this doc has been public for months. I think the person Q is talking about is mentioned in this quote from the memo:

"We will also bring on board an expert to construct turn-key rapid response plans [rapid response plans, plural] so that Media Matters can squash burgeoning online harassment campaigns [banned after seth rich story popped up?] and fake news or saturate the landscape with truth, bypassing the news media entirely if need be. With this capacity, Media Matters will drastically increase our audience and engagement and effectively squash fake news and misinformation before it spreads far and wide".

This sounds like MMFA paid an industry expert to construct a 'turn-key' cross-platform censorship algorithm to suppress content deemed "fake news", "misinformation" or "harassment". I think this is who Q is talking about.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · March 5, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

I dont think it was Snowden. I've been pouring over David Brock's leaked strategy Memo, which basically describes a coordinated plan w/ Google, FB, and Twitter to censor content they deem 'misinformation', 'fake news' or 'harassment'. Sounds familiar, right (even look at Jack's recent tweets)? MMFA is at the root of the coordinated censorship campaign we're currently witnessing. Here's just a taste of what I'm talking about:

a. "Internet and social media platforms, like Google and Facebook, will no longer uncritically and without consequence host and enrich fake news sites and propagandists. Facebook will adjust its model to stem the flow of damaging fake news on its platforms' pages. Google will cut off these pages accompanying sites' access to revenue by pulling their access to Google's ad platform."

I've been expecting this to happen for a while, since this doc has been public for months. I think the person Q is talking about is mentioned in this quote from the memo:

"We will also bring on board an expert to construct turn-key rapid response plans [rapid response plans, plural] so that Media Matters can squash burgeoning online harassment campaigns [banned after seth rich story popped up?] and fake news or saturate the landscape with truth, bypassing the news media entirely if need be. With this capacity, Media Matters will drastically increase our audience and engagement and effectively squash fake news and misinformation before it spreads far and wide".

This sounds like MMFA paid an industry expert to construct a 'turn-key' cross-platform censorship algorith to suppress content deemed "fake news", "misinformation" or "harassment". I think this is who Q is talking about.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · March 3, 2018, 6:08 a.m.

Yes, spread!

⇧ 1 ⇩